Why do you play in a casino if you don’t want to take a risk?
This is why I said that rollbit might not aware on this kind of strategy to safely clear their protion with minimal risk involve and later on ban him when they detected.
I have a counter question. Placing bets on 1.01 odds does not guarantee that this is 100% safe. Why not take minimum risks when I can take it? The reward for the minimum risk is tiny as well. Why would I take risk when there are other options. If you don't give me other options, I have to take risk. I guess rollbit aware of it because there was another case in this forum. If it's a common pattern, then it's known by the casino already.
We are not talking here the 100% guarantee but the way you place bet just to claim the promotion reward. As a business owner. Are you happy that someone placing that kind of bet which he will not normally do without any promotion involved? This is why I said above if you read it that promotion is not intended that way. It’s an extra reward for your normal bets.
I understand your point. It's true that no casinos want their players take advantage of bonuses. It's not profitable for their business at all. But, what I am saying is, they have option to limit these things. They are aware of such behavior as they are the owner and they are the first one to notice the abuse. I believe you have played in some casinos where your wager does not count as qualified wager if you place bets in low odds. For example, In some casinos, you cannot use your free bet ticket on below 1.50 odds. Your wager won't count from table games. Your wager won't count from 99% win chance dice bets. Actually you can limit these things if you want as casino owner. But, why did you kept it open for users?
The main point I want to emphasize is that when I withdraw money from the casino, it becomes mine. On the other hand, when I make a deposit, it's still my money.
I use my funds to place bets at odds like 1.01 and 1.1, both to rank higher and gradually build up my balance. The casino offers features such as rakeback, weekly and monthly bonuses, similar to what Stake does. However, these bonuses are calculated based on your performance since the last time.
The issue might revolve around rakeback, especially considering they have a calendar bonus that activates every 8 hours, boosting your rakeback for an hour. This could imply that making low odds bets during that hour is seen as abusive. It seems like you can only bet on low odds for 21 out of 24 hours.
For instance, if I bet $100 on 1.01 odds, I win $1, but it's essential to note that just because it's 1.01 odds doesn't guarantee a win. Statistically, I'm supposed to lose at least 1/100 times based on the odds. However, during that hour, I might also receive an extra $1 in rakeback due to the increased rate, effectively doubling my winnings.
However, I must stress that I'm speculating because I lack clarity on the exact reasons behind these actions being considered abusive. My suspicions arise from a similar situation I found in another post where someone had their balance taken. If the casino's rules are indeed as I speculate, it would be helpful if they were clearly stated for all players to understand, so we all had the chance to think “omg thats too complicated for me, see ya”.