Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 123. (Read 84471 times)

Why would people be minding themselves about KYC if you cant bare up with the risk then you could always leave out Roobet and find another place which you could play on.There's still lots of options or places
on which you could play which it doesnt ask out for some KYc and if you are not that confident with the current requirements on this platform we could always have the option to take.
Doesnt really need to make yourself stick unless if you are really  that a loyal user or player of this platform but honestly im not that confident on inputting some small personal details
just for me to gamble.

it's true if we can't trust 100% about our personal data that we store on an online platform, it's very risky. but for me life is full of risks that we have to take and on the other hand do we have to be against not KYC if we get a big win and want to withdraw our funds from a certain platform? and with a sense of compulsion we have to do KYC to be able to withdraw the big wins that have been obtained.

and all of that returns to the individual gamblers themselves. if they trust any of the gambling platforms to do KYC, go for it. but if you don't believe or don't feel safe doing KYC, don't do it.

You can never be 100% certain about the 100% safely store it" thing. Because hackers keep trying and even the biggest places in the world end up getting hacked. Look at just Edward Snowden and you would know, worlds strongest and most powerful people got hacked and all of their secrets are public now, interestingly nothing happened to most of them and people who should have been either voted out or hated literally got defended, but the idea of any information could be hacked is there for proof.

Hence, if someone wants to hack into the KYC database anywhere they could do that and that is why people do not want to give their KYC anywhere like casino because it is not accepted in most parts of the world.

Recently I got an offer from Roobet via email by getting 100 FreeSpins and a value of 0.2/spin so a total of $20 if I make a deposit of $100, if I'm not mistaken I've gotten this offer twice, but have never used it because I haven't found the rules for how much roll over for the deposit value or also for the value obtained from FreeSpin, maybe someone has also received the same offer and has followed it can share your experience with this offer?

I've been at Roobet.com a long time and have never had a problem or complaint about the KYC that is supposed to be in place to keep gambling here.
I believe that Roobet can safely store KYC that has been given by other gamblers to comply with the rules set by Roobet.
I also feel that while gambling at Roobet I have never experienced any problems after KYC there and Roobet.com is very friendly.

and actually for me KYC is not a complicated thing to do even though some gamblers don't agree with the terms. but we also have to comply with the rules set by the platform. it doesn't mean that we are subject to the platform, but we only comply and respect what has been set.
you don't need to worry about KYC on Roobet.com as long as you don't abuse the features available on Roobet.

Exactly. So many people fail to understand that discussion related to this topic will never completely go away in the gambling board and it's something that everyone have got used to hearing about by now.

They should simply ignore KYC related discussions and discuss whatever they want to in my opinion.

I agree. This was tackled for a long time now and I think gamblers who chose to stay playing on Roobet despite of the mandatory level 1 kyc already accepted this requirement since the site is reputable and trusted by many gamblers here. Eversince the kyc is implemented on Roobet, I decided to comply because I want to keep playing in this site and that's it, no question. Up to now I don't have any issue playing on this site, all is smooth.

It's simple, if you're not comfortable playing in a platform with kyc, you can look for other casino who doesn't require it.

It is enough about KYC.

Do people discuss about KYC on Binance months after the application? They accepted it and submit documents to continue using Binnace exchange.
Please do the same with Roobet site. If you love it, trust the team, want to play their games, do KYC and continue with your bet, enjoy your fun and happiness with Roobet games.

Probably because of the OP inactive here, many starts to talk more about KYC instead of the promotions and bonuses with Roobet and I think its fine as long as we remain on that topic. If Roobet will start not to collect KYC better to delete all the data to be fair but I think its too impossible to happen since they are just following the regulation and Roobet is not forcing anyone here to gamble with their site.

That is a very very important part because they could always remove it anytime they want. Not like they want your mothers maiden name, they want very little things and the best thing could always become them not wanting something at all and could do that.

The idea of KYC being talked here a lot is the fact that people are still not fine with it and that means Roobet could come out one day and say "we decided not to take any more KYC and deleted all the data we have" and that would be 100% amazing. If you think that won't happen then it's fine and you should not talk about it, but there are too many people here who hopes for that and talks about it to make it happens.

Exactly. 1xbit is one of the biggest scam operators out there in the cryptocurrency world, but they are allowed to operate just like 1xbet who are also scammers despite major licensed authorities observing them regularly.

This is one of the primary reasons why I am a fan of BTC since it reduces your dependence on the government to some extent.

The KYC debate will most likely never die down to be honest and you can find gamblers discussing it regularly in multiple gambling threads. Makes sense considering how important and critical it is.

As much as I want to make a comment with regards to this one but I think this topic is on the wrong thread, we are talking not about Roobet here anymore.

If KYC is still the issue with Roobet here, then I guess its better to contact the support of Roobet and ask if there’s an alternative for this. Let’s use this thread to talk more about Roobet especially with the on-going promotions and bonuses.

The regulations are actually made by the government to keep track record of these platforms and have tax from them in the first hand not for users safety.They will ask them to track you as well but if you say about coinbase then do you think they cannot scam you just because of regulations then you are wrong man.You need to be responsible because many government don't accept crypto as legal so funds are your responsibility.

As unfortunate as the case is, I can't help but agree with you, regulations only help a very few persons make more money, and that is the people in the government, the regulators if I may put it that way.
Regulation don't protect the common man out there, the only time the effect of regulation seems to be noticed is when there's a major incident that affect several persons including them themselves-the regulators, like in the case of FTX collapse and the likes.

Regulators claim they regulate gambling casinos to protect gamblers, this to me is a big lie.
Have seen some online casinos with operating licenses shut down, and zooms off with money belonging to gamblers, and the perpetrators never caught.
If indeed they offer such services as they claim, incidents like this wouldn't happen.

Regulations don't always protect you. If that were the case, no FIAT related scams would have been successful. The world governments themselves are corrupt and steal from common people all the time.

BTC was created by Satoshi to transfer some power back to the masses which is why a fully regulated crypto market makes zero sense.

Well, there will always be disagreements about these things, some criteria can be taken into account that one does not know, I personally do not know or have any idea how these things can be evaluated, and when it comes to art it is likely that it will leave me more in limbo I think those who won are deserving, and the Roobet team may have experts in this type of field, because to choose the best among the great arts that existed is something that I at least would not know what criteria to take, if at all Sometimes in valuations that have to do with works of art I usually take a long time due to the research that is done, this is something that every detail counts.


I don't know whether to call what we are experiencing a bear market, because in the long term what seems to be in a period of re-accumulation, I am saying this from my personal analysis, in the short term I think that it could occur or be called as a period bearish, it really is something that can vary a lot.

With respect to those who have money in an exchange, be it coinbase or something similar, many no longer believe in having their money in exchanges, I think that Binance, due to its desire to have a lot of control over the market, is that they have not been able to do much and What they achieved was to scare off the holders, however for now if a bearish market is interpreted, it can be taken advantage of so that in Roobet you can bet and multiply it would be a very good option, taking into account the risk.

Or simply we do really have that security on what we are really that wishing since everything could really be traced up but in exchange it does really remove the real essence of crypto gambling which it should

really be in pure anonymity which is fully contrary.If people do see rampant issues or complaints about hacked funds or simply scamming then people would really be demanding or wouldnt really oppose
this kind of centralization but rather they would really much prefer because we know on what would be the exchange of it and it is really that advantage.
So far, the implementations arent really that too much strict though since KYC isnt something that mandatory or necessary before you could able to play.

That is absurd, too much and strict regulation will limit ecosystem development, after all, in specifically what part of the cryptocurrency platform ecosystem do they need to regulate? entities that have centralized aspects surely will be subject to the applicable regulation. But do in mind, due to the true nature of cryptocurrencies, they can't simply touch cryptocurrencies. In fact, too much regulation intervention will harm instead of save it.

I am not entirely sure if we are only looking at just a bear market, we are looking at a crashed market that is crumbled right now and even injured if you like to call it that. We didn't just sell and the price went down, we are talking about a market that got hit by a lot of stuff and that causes it to be this low. Regulations are there to prevent these things, like if you invest your money into an exchange and trade there, regulations are there to prevent it from stealing your money.

Places that are accepted by governments, such as coinbase, would not be able to steal your money and that is the important thing to see in this situation, regulations do matter, and they are there to protect you.

sorry but it makes no sense
the FTX case is the proof that regulation can "protect" users only to some extent
and in many cases will do exactly nothing
FTX was regulated
Sam is out of jail even after stealing 8 billion dollars from costumers
Ross is in jail for 2 lifetimes plus some years

the system is not fair