I also cannot believe that someone in their perfect mental faculties would be able to deposit money in an online casino, play a little and leave the casino leaving money in the casino and that person spend days, weeks, months, and years without entering the casino, that person would not be well mentally if they did that, because everyone or at least most people are always worried about money because they need money to pay bills, buy things, so why would someone who would be mentally well leave money in the casino knowing that it will disappear for long time? does not make sense
I could even understand if someone makes a deposit at the casino, plays a little and then that person has an accident in real life and cannot enter the casino due to the fact that he is in the hospital or in a bed without any strength to enter the online casino or else in cases where the person is very sick and there is no way to enter the casino, these are exceptional cases and they make sense, but if a person is in good health and leaves money in the casino and disappears, then that person is not well mental health
I assume that this was mainly for people who are super rich. Which means if you had 150 million dollars in your bank account and there is 650 dollars left in some casino, maybe you wouldn't care about it all that much? The logic is not too far fetched, a person who has 150 million may leave 650 because I have like 1500 in the bank instead and if I had like 6.5 cents in a casino then I would also probably ignore it as well, and to them 650 is like that.
This is why I believe that there is a possibility of this happening for sure. It's not going to be that much of a good deal for them to run around and try to find what is peanuts to them, might be a lot to us but it's nothing to them.
i dont believe anyone would put millions of dollars into some online casino and then start playing and forget 650$, the mindset of a gambler is to always play until your account balance is zero, then make another deposit again and keep playing, if he wins a lot of money he will withdraw some of the money and then continue playing until his account balance is zero, casino players don't forget money in the casino.
something I learned in these months playing is that when you put money in the casino, you already know that you only have two options: play and win and withdraw profits and continue playing or else play and lose and put more money, but this thing of saying that a player will put money in the casino and after playing for some time he forgets his money in the casino, I honestly don't see how a player could do that, unless as I said there are cases where the person gets sick and or forgets to your password would be acceptable
when it comes to contests this is the hardest thing
sometimes we will disagree with the results but there are things bigger than us playing out on the decisions
many times it's just a matter of taste of who's judging it
I think in Roobet art contest, the judges are professional and they're making sure they've pick best of the best artist who deserve to win the contest. If there's a person who think the winner is unfair, actually they can just post their opinion on that's thread. In the past there's few people who complain about the winner, but the recent contest, it seems no one is complaining so everyone are agree with Hhampuz and Roobet's team decision.
not saying anything about the judges
I joined roobet contests before and really enjoyed the experience
my point is that with all art there are subjective matters on decisions
of course there's quality and we can identify it, but I'm talking about something else.
Sometimes i will say that those judges do make some mistake during the time of picking the best art, because their is some art you think that will be among the winners but when they pick you will not see those art's, and secondly i think they know exactly what they are directly looking for the art contest selection that is causing that, because the art we consider here that is good is not being considered as good art, i think they have robot they use to picture out the good arts.
there's that
sometimes quality is easy to spot (I'm reading a book that talks a lot about it, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance")
but there are parts of it that are subjective, when judging art I believe what the judge like or dislike will always plays a role on the final result
and that's ok
we're human after all
it is very difficult to understand how these judges who judge arts manage to reach the conclusion that the art of person X is better than the art of person Y, maybe since I am not an artist and I do not frequent museums and places where paintings of art are exposed, so I I don't understand art, but I always wonder what criteria they use to judge arts