i tried to be member.. i saw , there is adress info on witdrawal section.. this is not good for bitcointalk gamblers
You may not know this, but there are many casinos on the market today that don't yet require any personal information from their players. Or at least, they ask for identification only when withdrawing large sums of money. This means that you still have a lot of choices, but if you decide to play with Roobet, you will have to comply with KYC procedures. It is important to know, however, that Level 1 KYC is usually sufficient, which means only basic personal information is required.
stake and sportsbet io dont want kyc.. i witdrawal 25.000 dollar on stake and sportsbet without kyc 1 or kyc 2 ...
there bookies are not good than stake , sportsbet
If you don't want KYC you can always skip playing at Roobet. Each casino have terms and condition to implement, they are carefully made to protect both players and the casino and each casino have a different point of interest so you can see different policy in each casino. You can either reach out to them about your issue and get the best answer yourself.
What happens is that both Stake, Bitcasino, SB are casinos that have had a long history over the years, they have a very good reputation and that age makes them somewhat more flexible, as well as their licenses, therefore they are more flexible with their clients, but there is something that Roobet has that is very good, the good reputation and its good contests, in addition to all this they have their contracts when the registration is made, what they call the T&C that we all give them to accept and when accepting we have to be willing to meet their demands, it's something like that, we can't go against it, if later on their terms and conditions are something else.
Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.
It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?
First of all not every trader has to be a gambler or vice versa so they don't know what is actually happening in one sector while they never crossed from their sectors. For example who has cryptocurrencies a lot and used to gamble only not using any exchange then they maybe surprised by sudden implementation of KYC because there is no such thing in the previous days they were playing.
If it can be, what happens is that the community of players is something else, but I know that there are many casino players who do not speculate in the market, they only care about having money, in this case coins to be able to play and try. Winning is something like when you enter a physical casino and exchange real money for chips or local currencies from the same casino, in the event that many players have some knowledge, some prefer decentralized exchanges, but you have to see what type of player and trader is, or what type of player-player or can be the case of trader-investor.
I think that a casino like Rootet encompasses all that, maybe the KYC is annoying, but in some cases it is necessary.