It's pretty obvious that Boolberrys biggest problem is, it has no team.
No its biggest (first-class) problem is it doesn't have a single feature that can't be adopted quickly by Monero and which makes it extremely compelling "must have" coin. A team won't change that.
So... not having a feature that can't be ripped off by XMR is a problem?
If it had features which were driving a market which is larger than XMR, which would not get adopted by XMR except on a lag, it could potentially accelerate past XMR in adoption. Yet apparently it is just trying to make marginal improvements to the same Cryptonote market XMR is.
Monero has a superior name, larger team, larger market cap, more investment, more funding.
It isn't beyond the realm of remote possibilities that the BBR developer could possibly surprise us and release some new feature that accomplished the above. But not likely.
It's pretty obvious that Boolberrys biggest problem is, it has no team.
No its biggest (first-class) problem is it doesn't have a single feature that can't be adopted quickly by Monero and which makes it extremely compelling "must have" coin. A team won't change that.
The second non-starter problem is the name isn't professional, i.e. it reflects on a lack of marketing.
Boolberry has had a working Official GUI Wallet for some time now. Boolberry has had the ability to prune the size of the blockchain since start. Monero has not quickly adopted either of these features.
If I look outside the Bitcointalk space, I see many products with different names that seemed bad at the time. The products did well. Google used a mispelled name. Yahoo is a derogatory term for a "rough" person.
Pruning the block chain doesn't drive a large user adoption at this stage, because no one knew it was important and it doesn't matter yet. And
I doubt your pruning works.
The GUI could have been big positive for adoption if your target market were dummies. What did you do to market this advantage to the less technical? Whereas most of the serious miners here are apparently willing to slog through a command line near-term if they believe (a GUI is coming soon and) that coin has greater serious support.
Things that drive user adoption are quite different and a marketing guru understands this intuitively.
Apologies for my frankness.
