Topic: [RUPL] Ranking-Up Pipe Line of Forum Members - page 6. (Read 3350 times)

I didn't miss it, but I didn't interpret it correctly either.

You're right (again!). But that makes the difference even more interesting. I only checked a few accounts, but I think it's safe to say:
Most accounts that received 9 Merit are high ranking already.
Most accounts that received 10 Merit are Members.

Many accounts "earned" just enough Merit to Rank up. That can't be a coincidence.

---

I have a list of 2053 accounts with 9 or 10 Merit earned, it's too long to post (if anyone wants to chase this, PM me for the full list).
The first 32 accounts with 9 Merit earned:
9106: xlcus (history)
12730: RedLine888 (history)
17870: Boing7898 (history)
37742: btcgolong (history)
73590: soy (history)
89349: erwinbit (history)
107855: Wed (history)
109296: magisterr (history)
116332: IGHOR (history)
116994: fragout (history)
128716: MarkAz (history)
148229: EfterlysT (history)
157669: newsilike (history)
174939: punkrock (history)
181858: ziya1453 (history)
182342: joelao95 (history)
229619: BTCHakan (history)
235218: coinplus (history)
238641: dogedice.me (history)
239997: rby (history)
249694: vindyne8 (history)
260575: MiningSensei (history)
268553: nikauforest (history)
302808: jvdp (history)
317290: Edraket31 (history)
329175: tee-rex (history)
331258: Trimegistus (history)
333831: designerusa (history)
334684: thandie (history)
336843: sidgrip (history)
356758: lili song (history)
361695: jiggytom (history)
(most accounts in the list above have a high rank)

The first 32 accounts with 10 Merit earned:
1680: georgewilliams (history)
2078: dorianm421 (history)
2318: AStephen2011 (history)
2439: zzxswqq (history)
2765: morrisby25 (history)
3079: chris200x9 (history)
5341: silkroad (history)
10896: pera (history)
12117: Tarion (history)
13446: Tiigon (history)
13475: mrhood (history)
20478: daly896 (history)
21408: James678 (history)
24674: aigeezer (history)
24826: Sergio_Demian_Lerner (history)
26494: timmeyh (history)
27470: cygan (history)
29456: viperzero (history)
30193: Freddy63 (history)
42420: FreeTrade (history)
44749: dukrat (history)
45089: pogi23 (history)
45998: HansMWurf (history)
47368: simplelove (history)
55503: squall1066 (history)
57175: jl2012 (history)
57313: Enkel (history)
62433: Capture (history)
66550: jayeeyee (history)
68177: jochemin (history)
73952: DarkNecromancer (history)
74263: BG4 (history)
(most accounts in the list above have a low rank)

This list(which I scraped from DdmrDdmr) is complete. I think you missed the Note - 2 in my post at the bottom

Yeah that's an interesting stat, I think we should analyse more before getting to any conclusion.( I am a believer of Merit trading users also to be tagged if staff can identify clear cut cases)

And also I think you missed  one part when you list down Merit transaction data. The initial Merit (airdoped Merits) also considered when I listing above members.

Isn't this list much easier to scrape those users?

The ones with 9 Merit got me thinking: I don't think this list is complete, right? I count 203 accounts with 9 Merit, and 1850 accounts with 10 Merit. That can't be a coincidence, does it mean 8 out of 9 Members have been trading Merit?

I couldn't resist, here's more data (based on last Friday's Merit data dump. Note: I didn't check for Activity):
1. merit received by 5959 users
2. merit received by 2542 users
3. merit received by 1239 users
4. merit received by 815 users
5. merit received by 1000 users
6. merit received by 581 users
7. merit received by 419 users
8. merit received by 302 users
9. merit received by 203 users
10. merit received by 1850 users (enough to rank up to Member)
11. merit received by 373 users
12. merit received by 293 users
13. merit received by 180 users
14. merit received by 146 users
15. merit received by 132 users
16. merit received by 110 users
17. merit received by 85 users
18. merit received by 96 users
19. merit received by 84 users
20. merit received by 144 users (round numbers are popular!)
21. merit received by 79 users
22. merit received by 69 users
23. merit received by 62 users
24. merit received by 50 users
.........
46. merit received by 13 users
47. merit received by 14 users
48. merit received by 13 users
49. merit received by 9 users
50. merit received by 63 users (giving 50 Merit at once used to be abused a lot)
51. merit received by 28 users
52. merit received by 19 users
53. merit received by 12 users
.........
84. merit received by 8 users
85. merit received by 3 users
86. merit received by 4 users
87. merit received by 7 users
88. merit received by 6 users
89. merit received by 2 users
90. merit received by 29 users (enough to rank up from Member to Full Member)
91. merit received by 7 users
92. merit received by 8 users
93. merit received by 7 users
94. merit received by 5 users
95. merit received by 3 users
96. merit received by 9 users
97. merit received by 2 users
98. merit received by 7 users
99. merit received by 2 users
100. merit received by 9 users (enough to rank up to Full Member from scratch)
101. merit received by 7 users
102. merit received by 5 users
103. merit received by 3 users
.........
238. merit received by 2 users
244. merit received by 1 users
248. merit received by 1 users
250. merit received by 4 users (Sr. Member level, without much data to go on)
251. merit received by 1 users
254. merit received by 1 users
255. merit received by 1 users
256. merit received by 1 users
257. merit received by 1 users
258. merit received by 1 users
261. merit received by 1 users

This was the project I never accomplished but wanted to do.
Thanks for this. I'll check those accounts, as soon as I can

I've just given bob123 6 merit - which is what he needs to rank up.

I'll have a look at some of the others in a minute

This is the motivation where I started to think about why we can't scraped the Merit data which iasenko searched, from available data in Bitcointalk Merit dashboard,prepared by DdmrDdmr (I called him as stat guru in bitcointalk forum ). So then he guided me how should I do this work. I manually scraped those stats from "Ranking-up pipe line tab" in the Merit dashboard. This list of members were tabulated according to the latest data available as at  30^th July 2018 and I will update this thread when Merit data dashboard updated by "DdmrDdmr".

Update 01 - Added Hero members could have ranked up to Legendary Members, Lacking Merits.
Update 02 - List of Members were updated from the latest data available 9^th August 2018