You should add Dave Kleiman to your list.
Dave Kleiman was a digital forensic research specialist ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman
The current Wright vs Kleiman court case has documented evidence that a text note on one of his PC's contained the following ...
"Is this a Satoshi address ?" (or words to that effect) [citation needed]
Dave most likely saw the Bitcoin software release here:
Bitcoin v0.1 released
Satoshi Nakamoto satoshi at vistomail.com
Thu Jan 8 14:27:40 EST 2009
- https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/014994.html
[heise online UK] Secure deletion: a single overwrite will do it
Dave Kleiman dave at davekleiman.com
Tue Jan 20 19:18:39
- https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/014994.html
January 2009 Archives by thread
- https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/thread.html#14994
The above is a 'subscribed' mailing list, so Dave would of received the information by email.
To this day it remains unclear if Dave actually mined any Bitcoin.
I do recall this ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.40
At one point in time, a number of years ago now, I considered it possible that Dave may have played a part in Bitcoin development.
However, I'd say today that I'm 99.99% certain that Dave had nothing whatsoever to do with Bitcoin creation.
The above ambiguity is where CSW's 'affinity sham' claim stems from.
...
If you want to know some facts about the real Satoshi, then this blog post is historically factual ...
- https://whoissatoshi.wordpress.com/2016/02/20/satoshi-in-california/
Also see ...
Still "Finding Satoshi" then ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54950273
and
Whois Satoshi? Known Satoshi IP addresses? ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55065045
