Author

Topic: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game - page 227. (Read 495994 times)

hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 531
First bits: 12good
i made a bet about an hour ago right before all these "below minimum" bets started being placed. can anybody tell me if this is win or lose?
df3335e1966d6f9aec4b2ac1937df29318c0a8eca3798f7b1606273a611da719


You have WON Smiley

info:
http://src.satoshidice.com/longpoll.php?tx=df3335e1966d6f9aec4b2ac1937df29318c0a8eca3798f7b1606273a611da719
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
I played this game yesterday morning and lost 130 coins, you will make a site I need to urgently restore a lost Smiley

jesus
donator
Activity: 3228
Merit: 1226
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I have seen this attack as well.
I was looking at results, and seeing 0.00000001 over and over again.

Bets under 0.0005 should return nothing, to prevent attacks.
Bets under 0.0005 should just be accepted as donation gifts.
Any bet above 0.0005 should have transaction subtracted from them.
So if someone sends 0.0006 they get back 0.0001.

This would make much more sense.

Satoshidice should implement this.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Satoshidice is being sabotaged by someone who lost 130 coins, OR a competitor.
legendary
Activity: 1357
Merit: 1004
I played this game yesterday morning and lost 130 coins, you will make a site I need to urgently restore a lost Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
i made a bet about an hour ago right before all these "below minimum" bets started being placed. can anybody tell me if this is win or lose?
df3335e1966d6f9aec4b2ac1937df29318c0a8eca3798f7b1606273a611da719

No.  They didn't process the bet yet, probably because they're busy rejecting thousands of 1 satoshi bets.
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
I would support SatoshiDice just keeping the "Below Min" bets as donations.  I don't have a problem at all with it.  It would make this kind of attack expensive and obsolete.
sr. member
Activity: 454
Merit: 250
Technology and Women. Amazing.
i made a bet about an hour ago right before all these "below minimum" bets started being placed. can anybody tell me if this is win or lose?
df3335e1966d6f9aec4b2ac1937df29318c0a8eca3798f7b1606273a611da719
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
Seems the site is fubar or being bombed with 1 Satoshi bets

Oh yes!  I hadn't noticed.

Looks like someone is sending many 1 satoshi bets.  For example: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/35996634

SatoshiDice pays a separate fee for each bet.  The attacker only pays a single fee to attack all the SatoshiDice addresses in a single transaction.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
Seems the site is fubar or being bombed with 1 Satoshi bets
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
The 0.01 as min bet is killing me so I had to quit, I used to play with small amounts in a gambling wallet looking for low lucky numbers. Now I have to stay above 12000 all the time, and there is no fun in that.

It will be great if you reconsider your decision, at least for number bellow 4000 for example

It would make sense to allow smaller min bets for the "long shot" bets.
hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 531
First bits: 12good
The 0.01 as min bet is killing me so I had to quit, I used to play with small amounts in a gambling wallet looking for low lucky numbers. Now I have to stay above 12000 all the time, and there is no fun in that.

It will be great if you reconsider your decision, at least for number bellow 4000 for example
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Are you serious? Reported for breaking reddit rules over asking for upvotes.

C'mon, who reads the rules?
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Are you serious? Reported for breaking reddit rules over asking for upvotes.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
S.DICE shareholders earned over 15% interest on an annualized basis from the month of November. Booyaa.

An idea has come to my mind. If I'm a shareholder and play SD then I can't lose, coz if I win I get winnings, if I lose I get dividends.  Grin

Betting as a form of hedging. MNW would roll in his bitcoin grave.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
S.DICE shareholders earned over 15% interest on an annualized basis from the month of November. Booyaa.

An idea has come to my mind. If I'm a shareholder and play SD then I can't lose, coz if I win I get winnings, if I lose I get dividends.  Grin

The next big thing after pirate.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
S.DICE shareholders earned over 15% interest on an annualized basis from the month of November. Booyaa.

An idea has come to my mind. If I'm a shareholder and play SD then I can't lose, coz if I win I get winnings, if I lose I get dividends.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
November Statement

The dividend for S.DICE on MPEX has now been paid for November. It was a great month! Enough profit was earned not only to cover the -2k loss from Oct, but even so, over $4k in net earnings on top of that was achieved.

Summary:
Earnings:   6146.78744309
Hosting/Tech Expenses:   60
Loss Carryover from Oct: -2071.07115151
   
Net Profit   4015.71629158
10% MPEX Dividend   401.57162915 

Volume over past 30 Days   180,827.90
Actual Profit over past 30 Days  6146.78744309
Expected Profit over past 30 Days   3435.73008515

Updated P&L: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aiec3-Eo_yO5dG5SQklHZG4wRm1GMW9DRWpMMW5UQkE#gid=7

S.DICE shareholders earned over 15% interest on an annualized basis from the month of November. Booyaa.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
So, some recent problems I've been working on:

1) Website/Frontend Database very slow (solved (I think))
I added some calls to a cache to avoid hitting the database.  This has improved things a great deal.

2) We were running out of available funds, which means we would pay with pending funds which can lead to a very poor user experience.  I've made a change such that once the available funds drops below a certain point Satoshidice will only process bets that meet our isLegit() check.  This check passes if the transaction is confirmed or if the transaction and all its UNCONFIRMED parents are known by Satoshidice and have a fee of at least 0.0005 BTC and if the depth of unconfirmed parents is less than 8.  This can lead to a delay, but I think it makes sense when available funds are running low to use them on the transactions most likely to confirm soon first.

3) We have had some things that have made me question the integrity of some of our databases.  As a recent example one of our internal reports of funds in accounts was off by several thousand BTC.  This is not good and led to the system thinking there was more funds than actually were there in our online wallet causing it to automatically send excess funds to an offline wallet.  This of course didn't help with problem #2 above.  I'll be working to track that down.  In the process of doing that there have been some outages in processing last night and this morning.  There will likely be more as I rebuild tables and do consistency checks over the next week or so.
Im assuming satoshidice ran out of money hence the delays in payout's then they raised the min's to screw all the small time martingaler's and bring the pot back up i could be *completely* wrong but it would appear that way

either way im stopping playing till the min's go back down ..

SD has not "ran out of money." November was actually one of the best months yet for house returns.

Min was not raised to "screw people". See above post.


you guys are contradicting each other ?

so i was right you are running out of funds... regardless i can't see the harm in running my php martingale script at min .001 if im paying the .0005 tx fee can some one explain to me how that is bad ? what effect it has on satoshi dice or the network itself ? i would think overall it would be a good thing for the network increasing traffic


No contradiction.  SD has plenty of money, but the database thought it had even more than that, resulting in some of the hot wallet funds being sent into cold storage. Thus the hot wallet had far less than it should, and this caused issues.
Jump to: