This is the same reasoning Lolcust used for why we should trust him with 7.7 mil premined. I can't trust Lolcust with that, and I can't trust these million sc holders. Sure, they don't want the coin to fail, but why can't they use their power to make more coins slowly? It won't kill the coin, but it will build their wealth. So now tell me why I should trust them.
Except I don't have 7 million coins, and I've already stated that it isn't "my coins" , it's every SC supporters. Just because I have the wallet doesn't mean much at all in my eyes. You can not believe that, it's your right.
So what happens after many years of this and all the trusted million dollar accounts are now less than a million dollar because they've transfered enough of their wealth to you and your CPF? Will you then become the sole trusted user and get to control everything? Nice! I'm looking forward to that.
CPF can obviously fund the account holders back to positive territory if needed. It's also one way to stop an attacker getting grip of one of the trusted wallets, if they do they can't spend it any other way than protecting the network.
By the time we have real millionaires we will have some very tight guidelines and recommendations for them to increase their security. Running on multiple nodes, block proxying, etc. The attacks I'm looking to defend against are government (the biggest) related ones. If we can defeat them everyone else will have no hope.
Now that SC2.0 is secure from this perspective I'll be able to argue with businesses that they can adopt SolidCoin as it's secure from all viable threats unlike all the other alternatives. I wasn't able to do this with BTC or SC1.