Flag supported. A person with genuine intent would have answered the questions calmly and professionally and not just having to delete them.
Looking at the profane language used by "humanrightsfoundation" both here and the retaliatory feedback. I have no doubts that the person behind the "donation" scheme has a malicious intent.
Topic: Scam accusation against user humanrightsfoundation - page 4. (Read 1694 times)
Innocent users, when falsely accused, tend to answer the questions they have been asked. They don't delete those questions and lock their thread. They don't leave retaliatory ratings and support fake flags on the people asking them questions. They don't throw insults at everyone. Your actions are not the actions of an innocent user. I would have expected someone so interested in human rights to at least be able to discuss things in a civil manner.
Can you explain why you decided to use the name of a widely known human rights organization?
Can you provide evidence of any of your claims?
Can you show how previous bitcoin donations to that address were spent?
The feedback option is used for abusive SPAM
A single post asking you some question is not abusive spam by any stretch.All 3 person immediately started orchestrating scam
You can still see my post archived here: https://archive.is/4qEKm#80%. At no point did I use the word "scam". I asked some questions which would be easy to answer for a legitimate organization. You responded by deleting those questions.It is inappropriate and it is just not true.
Then please answer the questions I posed to you earlier:Can you explain why you decided to use the name of a widely known human rights organization?
Can you provide evidence of any of your claims?
Can you show how previous bitcoin donations to that address were spent?
Flag supported.
This was my deleted post
This is no proof of anything. Anyone can request your address to be tagged in blockchain.com explorer. And it is tagged only there. In any other block explorer you willhaveno tag.
It doesn't matter if your organization is based on Switzerland or whatever. You have to prove that the donations are not for you, but for the human rights foundation. And you failed to do so, and deleted the posts that proved you wrong. Scammer
This was my deleted post
Blockchain. Tagged addresses.
This is no proof of anything. Anyone can request your address to be tagged in blockchain.com explorer. And it is tagged only there. In any other block explorer you willhaveno tag.
Flag 666? 
The feedback option is used for abusive SPAM because we have deleted some comments from our self moderated topic. All 3 person immediately started orchestrating scam, scam but in reality we are a legitimate Swiss human rights organization. We are not open for retarded people's opinions. Do some research.
The feedback option is used for abusive SPAM because we have deleted some comments from our self moderated topic. All 3 person immediately started orchestrating scam, scam but in reality we are a legitimate Swiss human rights organization. We are not open for retarded people's opinions. Do some research.
It doesn't matter if your organization is based on Switzerland or whatever. You have to prove that the donations are not for you, but for the human rights foundation. And you failed to do so, and deleted the posts that proved you wrong. Scammer
What is interesting is that given Bitcoin address is active
so BTC movement can be tracked to see where it goes.
https://btc-explorer.com/address/18fyEQXaZQgCbNoE5Qjs6W7Pnqc9Yp4PQD
So far
received 5.37276269 BTC
sent 5.37241998 BTC
balance 0.00034271 BTC
so BTC movement can be tracked to see where it goes.
https://btc-explorer.com/address/18fyEQXaZQgCbNoE5Qjs6W7Pnqc9Yp4PQD
So far
received 5.37276269 BTC
sent 5.37241998 BTC
balance 0.00034271 BTC
Hope you don't mind creating a type 1 flag to make the accusations more visible.
I was waiting to give the user a chance to respond to this thread, or answer the questions I outlined above, if he so wished. Instead he deleted all the other comments questioning him from his own thread and left frivolous retaliatory red trust to myself, bitmover and Vod.Flag has been created here for anyone who wishes to support it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=666
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 4265
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
Definitely a scammer and also a previous user of the forum, the person behind the account knows for the scheme to be successful he/she needs to make his thread self moderated to delete any post questioning their credibility. Seen some negative feedback from DT members on the account, that's great. Hope you don't mind creating a type 1 flag to make the accusations more visible. This is definitely an imposter, with scam intentions. It's just too obvious.
Edit: supported flag. Will only withdraw my support if user can proof their credibility without any doubt.
Edit: supported flag. Will only withdraw my support if user can proof their credibility without any doubt.
User humanrightsfoundation recently start this self-moderated thread in Project Development: Donate Bitcoin to Human Rights Foundation
I made the following post at the bottom of the thread, which was promptly deleted by him:
He also deleted another post by bitmover asking for proof that the donation address wasn't just his own address.
Archived thread with aforementioned posts visible: https://archive.is/4qEKm
The combination of stealing the name of a well known organization, making grandiose claims with no evidence, refusing to answer simple questions, and deleting any post which questions him, makes it almost certain that this is a scam attempt.
I made the following post at the bottom of the thread, which was promptly deleted by him:
Quote from: o_e_l_e_o
I'm sorry, but this all looks highly suspicious.
The website of the real Human Rights Foundation (the one you will have heard of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Foundation) is here https://hrf.org/.
They also accept bitcoin donations here: https://hrf.org/donate-bitcoin/
An extensive search can find nothing to support your claim that you provide secure tools or communication channels - your website simply recommends that users should use Tails and Tor, both of which are provided open source and for free. I can find nothing to suggest that your company has done anything at all outside of setting up this very generic website. Similarly, an extensive search can find nothing that your founder has contributed outside of links back to your questionable website.
Can you explain why you decided to use the name of a widely known human rights organization? Can you provide evidence of any of your claims? Can you show how previous bitcoin donations to that address were spent?
The website of the real Human Rights Foundation (the one you will have heard of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Foundation) is here https://hrf.org/.
They also accept bitcoin donations here: https://hrf.org/donate-bitcoin/
An extensive search can find nothing to support your claim that you provide secure tools or communication channels - your website simply recommends that users should use Tails and Tor, both of which are provided open source and for free. I can find nothing to suggest that your company has done anything at all outside of setting up this very generic website. Similarly, an extensive search can find nothing that your founder has contributed outside of links back to your questionable website.
Can you explain why you decided to use the name of a widely known human rights organization? Can you provide evidence of any of your claims? Can you show how previous bitcoin donations to that address were spent?
He also deleted another post by bitmover asking for proof that the donation address wasn't just his own address.
Archived thread with aforementioned posts visible: https://archive.is/4qEKm
The combination of stealing the name of a well known organization, making grandiose claims with no evidence, refusing to answer simple questions, and deleting any post which questions him, makes it almost certain that this is a scam attempt.
Jump to: