The court said it clear - it is not required for it to decide is CSW Satoshi or not, so it doesn't decide, as it doesn't have to.
So let's stop lying about the judge ruling that CSW was 1/2 of Satoshi, shall we?
However, the evidence that was accepted as true drove Judge Reinhart to establish those facts:
(1) Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into
a 50/50 partnership to develop Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin; (2) any
Bitcoin-related intellectual property developed by Dr. Wright prior to David Kleiman’s
death was property of the partnership, (3) all bitcoin mined by Dr. Wright prior to David
Kleiman’s death (“the partnership’s bitcoin”) was property of the partnership when
mined; and (4) Plaintiffs presently retain an ownership interest in the partnership’s
bitcoin, and any assets traceable to them.
Again, this could mean anything between they mined a million bitcoin and they mined zero bitcoin.
Also, the Court did not strike ALL CSW defenses - striked 3 to 10
1,2,11,12,13 defenses were accepted by the Court. Now, go ahead and see what those defenses represent and also note that an appeal was made and most likely will pass as there are sufficient grounds.
That's great.
You call me a troll, when stating the obvious started to count as trolling?
The only thing that is obvious is that you are lying about what the judge ruled.
