Pages:
Author

Topic: [SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed - page 11. (Read 100174 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.

Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months.

Do you deny you are IconicExpert?

Firstly, didn't you posted just above that Dan had denied being the same person in the documents? I am confused...

Secondly, I don't know if it has been posted or not, if it has, it has. That is indeed the infamous Dan Metcalf and, according to the documents, he's the same individual.

Thirdly: I believe IconicExpert is quite busy with his own coin project about to launch, tomorrow I think. At this point only people affected by profound retardation -or very unethical agendas-, choose to believe that lie that has been denied and demonstrated for months... and in frustration or not, the only, evident, repeated, obvious answer is NO, I am not. But you are more than welcome to believe anything you want... although I personally identify myself much more with Batman...

You sound very confused I must say, where did I post that he denied owing the taxman $70k? I just said I didn't know if you cared to read my post. And if you think he has denied it, where is the proof that this guy:
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

is the same Dan Metcalf as the one mentioned in the tax lien here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9476089

There is no address on the tax lien. So there is no proof. I know which address I can connect to the dev, but is it the same as on the tax lien?
Tax liens exists on Dan's Metcalf companies:
http://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/liens/lienssearch.aspx
Search for Metcalf Daniel
Two corporate tax liens are under his name: 044090004813 and 044090005922
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
i was told about the tax info shit

Quote
Sent to: Spoetnik on: October 31, 2014, 03:05:15 PM

and i told you all and you fucking called me a FUD'er / Liar and said i made it up so he better not admit it NOW or i will be choked !
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.

Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months.

Do you deny you are IconicExpert?

ya he did and called me a liar for saying that way before this guy posted that Tax info on THIS topic.

all of you seem to forget i posted that tax info on my topics on Blocknet way before this one
and yes i was told all my info was a lie, phoshop'd FUD'ing etc
and now you guys pretend none of that happened BEFORE and go on to play more games here when another guy posts photo PROOF......again

and i ask yet again....................why
was my topic deleted ?

i posted the fucking TRUTH for fuck sakes !
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.

Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months.

Do you deny you are IconicExpert?

Firstly, didn't you posted just above that Dan had denied being the same person in the documents? I am confused...

Secondly, I don't know if it has been posted or not, if it has, it has. That is indeed the infamous Dan Metcalf and, according to the documents, he's the same individual.

Thirdly: I believe IconicExpert is quite busy with his own coin project about to launch, tomorrow I think. At this point only people affected by profound retardation -or very unethical agendas-, choose to believe that lie that has been denied and demonstrated for months... and in frustration or not, the only, evident, repeated, obvious answer is NO, I am not. But you are more than welcome to believe anything you want... although I personally identify myself much more with Batman...

You sound very confused I must say, where did I post that he denied owing the taxman $70k? I just said I didn't know if you cared to read my post. And if you think he has denied it, where is the proof that this guy:
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

is the same Dan Metcalf as the one mentioned in the tax lien here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9476089

There is no address on the tax lien. So there is no proof. I know which address I can connect to the dev, but is it the same as on the tax lien?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 280

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.



Dan's address is public already. I'm not going to post it or anything, but that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone considering he's made his business public. And it looks like he redacted the address and Dan's wife name out of respect for Dan's family who might not even know what XC is.

And I highly doubt there are 6 Dan R Metcalf's in Marshfield. Close to zero probability of that I think. Are you sure you're not just finding the same Dan 6 times?
legendary
Activity: 1051
Merit: 1000
https://r.honeygain.me/XEDDM2B07C
Wow. You are an idiot. You really should just lock this topic before you humiliate yourself even more.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.

Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months.

Do you deny you are IconicExpert?

Firstly, didn't you posted just above that Dan had denied being the same person in the documents? I am confused...

Secondly, I don't know if it has been posted or not, if it has, it has. That is indeed the infamous Dan Metcalf and, according to the documents, he's the same individual.

Thirdly: I believe IconicExpert is quite busy with his own coin project about to launch, tomorrow I think. At this point only people affected by profound retardation -or very unethical agendas-, choose to believe that lie that has been denied and demonstrated for months... and in frustration or not, the only, evident, repeated, obvious answer is NO, I am not. But you are more than welcome to believe anything you want... although I personally identify myself much more with Batman...
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.

Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone.

Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months.

Do you deny you are IconicExpert?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 280

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

Has Dan already been asked and denied it explicitly(And I mean explicitly as he likes to play games with his answers)?

If it is true, and he does owe a substantial amount in back taxes that is scary for anyone who lets him hold money. It doesn't automatically make him guilty of theft though. I doubt his plan is to run off with the money to be honest. I think if the tax issue is real then it sheds some light on what his motivations were for getting involved with someone like Prometheus and his group. I think he's in this for profit, pure and simple. It was possible that he was naive at the time, getting involved with Promethus, but his staunch defense of him after reading the chat screenshots, going as far to call him 'ethical' pretty much eliminates that one. Even with the most 'charitable' reading of Dan's words.

I wouldn't completely discount the potential of some sort of 'hack' or whatever where coins go missing though. I also would never be investing in a project lead by someone with these sorts legal issues if it's true. Too much pressure, government doesn't mess around. US Gov has seized BTC before. Not the IRS though as far as I know.

The odds of there being another Dan R Metcalf in Marshfield seem pretty slim considering it's not a big city really. Could be a cousin or something though if we really want to stretch it. My money would be on it being him though.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.

Has Dan actually denied being this guy?

Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1

I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
Well Blocknet made its goal, so it is going to happen, sorry but the competitors smear campaign failed,

Do you have any evidence that the many concerns that were raised were nought but a 'smear campaign' and, more importantly, were from a competitor?

Because simply dismissing the valid concerns of people who were being critical of this ITO and those behind it, isn't helpful and paints you as somebody who will simply declare everything that doesn't agree with you to be FUD.



Several of the most vocal accounts FUDDing Blocknet and XC with topics and posts have been found to be all sock puppet accounts of the same person: Unicornfarts, Danisdone, rdnkjdi.

I also suspect several other accounts to be by the same person but unlike the above I have no proof so I won't post yet.

It's amazing how much damage just a couple of people can do with determination and fake accounts.

I just looked up your post history and have to laugh at your proof. mr_random post history
I hate to burst your bubble but your way off and have no clue what your talking about and your a bad judge of character.

This kid here has a big mouth full of garbage.. i see what he has for proof and it's simply laughable.

this picture i think is big mouth's proof LOL



and by the way the damage was done by Dan and his crew..
don't blame the cops when you got caught for your crime !

and i liked the guys comment on Cloak earlier.
here is your Blocknet team when they were still pushing Cloak.. http://pastebin.com/QLYy2uLj
Notice how the coin is dead today and abandoned ?
Notice the Cloak clothing line plans ?
How about the Cloak Documentry ?
Or how about the CIARA ?
Yes they actually have the nerve to try and start a Cloak retirement savings plan ROFL
and that is just ONE coin in their wake of damage on the scene.. just one small part of the scam puzzle from a group of corrupt pricks and their scammer pals !

i can not comprehend how any smart person could hear the stuff guys are posting here (with out me) and still want to invest in Blocknet etc
This is crazy !
And guys all your doing is building a better scam here for Danny.. he is watching like a hawk and using each criticism as a way to patch up all holes in his scam ship.
It's amazing how fast he has put a response out to things i have said LOL
Get it ? Don't TEACH HIM how to make a better scam Wink

And guys let's have a Q&A from the Dan he can clear up the mystery of him and that synechrist guy.. same person ? if not then what do they both do ?
Also it's funny how there is such militant supporters of Blocknet ..almost like they have a vested interest in it for some odd reason LOL
Meaning i think we need a Q&A with each coin dev of every coin that signed on to participate in Blocknet.
They were all made by a different guy no Huh
Then lastly we need a Q&A from exchange staff as to why they added it at all even after hearing this crap early on..
And the best for last..
Bitcointalk needs to explain why they have carefully censored me from Talking about Blocknet.. quietly sweeping my topics about it under the rug.
According to the guy i just quoted mr_random.. it may be because "I am a cunt" but i don't see how that has any bearing on the matter..
is being a cunt a rule here ?

I'll be holding my breath waiting for answers  Roll Eyes

and yeah i know who some of the accounts are and NO i will not tell you either mr_random LOL

Cool story bro. You write and behave like someone with a mental disorder. Reading your delusional rants and trolling reminds me what a good life I have. Lol.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report.

Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise:

1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"

2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC."

3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for."

The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.


You cannot be serious?! If people doubt you the burden of proof is on YOU to prove that the whole thing is a scam, not for you to beg for money to connect dots that aren't even there. It's clear now that you're doing this for money you self-righteous prick. Either that or you're just batshit crazy and need to put down the hash pipe as the paranoia is clearly getting to you.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
there is nothing on google for "BK: 44055 notice of federal tax lien" what are those alleged valid documents where did you get them?

Source please.
http://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSummary.aspx?FEIN=001068271&SEARCH_TYPE=4
This is Dan's ATC SOLUTIONS LLC. As you can see from the registry info his middle name is indeed R. Moreover, the address is the same as the address in the lien: MARSHFIELD, MA 02050 USA
This is another Dan's company that was registered in 2004:
http://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSummary.aspx?FEIN=000866108&SEARCH_TYPE=4
Again, the same address.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:

1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.

2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?

if all else fails

3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.

I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.

A simple thank you was all that was necessary.

I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.
Thanks for your research! It would be great if you could post the full research file you have on Dan.
However, I don't think that asking for BTC to do a research will make it more credible, quite the opposite you are losing credibility with that approach.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
oh and that story link where synechrist spouts off mentions on the last line..

https://twitter.com/brelly1978/status/529294088567132161

Quote
Is Bitcointalk a large part of the problem? Why aren’t scammers, poop ‘n scoop tacticians (fudsters), and the like appropriately banned? Perhaps the following conversation on Twitter is a fitting close: https://twitter.com/brelly1978/status/529294088567132161

So uhhhhhhh i am suppose to be impressed with the credibility of Cryptoknight's Tweet comment ?

Are you guys aware that is one of shit loads of dummy accounts by infamous wacko Troll cryptopaths ? LOLOLOLL

Ya.. Blocknet is legit ..cryptopaths said so ROFL  Roll Eyes

PS:
It obvious "they" are the ones that "photshop'd" crap too NOT any of us "smear campaign'ers".  Roll Eyes
their whole planned FUD attack stuff is just hilarious and 100% made up !
People were outraged from all sources at this scammy deceptive bullshit.. even some of us that had not gotten along before now do against Blocknet !
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
This is hilarious. I knew XC was junk right from the start.

whats hilarious, is leewilsons strange obsession, and the fact this thread is still around. lol

you don't have to read it. Answer the questions or be quit.

tempted to " be quit"

What questions are you referring to?

If its anything spoetnik has posted, you will have to decipher it for me, his posts hurt my brain so i skip them.

leewilsons tend to be long winded and irrelevant (see my last post.)

What brain? If you would have any you wouldn't be posting the biased bull crap you continue posting 24/7 defending the indefensible. Dan Metcalf is a LIAR. Dan Metcalf doesn't even know the meaning of ethical. Dan Metcalf is a paid co-conspirator to steal the money of people in many coins. Dan Metcalf belongs in jail... and that's exactly where he will end up sooner rather than later... along with quite a few others, including the dictator that runs XC's thread. Time is running out and they can try to run but there's no place to hide. The Feds are on the hunt and it is just a matter of time the clean up machine arrives and puts the trash in jail.

It will be quite a few months too late already...

/ ramblings of a madman.

Like I said, what questions?

why is Dan a lair? why is everyone going to end up in jail?

I'm not part of the XC/Blocknet team, but I have read pretty much every post from both sides.

What makes you think these things?

Seriously... ask me some questions. I highly doubt I could answer any that haven't already been answered, but ill try.





The time for questions (except in front of a jury) is long past. Everything is very clear to anyone with the most basic common sense.

But since you pose a very stupid question that has been answered a few times by Dan himself -and proves you haven't read anything, including Metcalf's own admissions of guilt-, I will answer you: Why is Dan a "lair"? you ask, and here's the answer: Because he has answered, at least three different times -all of them available for checking on the net-, with different and opposed answers, to the question "where you involved with Prometheus when asked to do a review of HAL's code?". First he answered "yes"; then he answered "No". And when faced with the contradiction he admitted the lie but "explained it away" with the pathetic "I was frustrated". See, in Dan's world, "being frustrated" means carte blanche to lie as much as he finds it convenient. Additionally he also denied any knowledge of Bobsurplus, only to admit a few seconds later that he had indeed talked to him on the skype. I'd say those alone -there are many, many more, would qualify anyone in Dan's position as a LIAR, don't you think? Humm, strike that, I am obviously barking at the wrong tree here...

Also in Dan's very personal world, a simple twitter that may or may not imply that he is on the payroll of Prometheus, means that it is a public admission of such and, peculiarly, exculpates him from any ethical or even legal responsibilities. Therefore if he has posted anywhere that he was doing a code review of a coin, or that he had done it, for Prometheus, that means -again in Dan's world, and ONLY in Dan's world- that it is a rightful thing to do... as many times as he is paid for it and fully knowing his involvement is being timed and used to deceive and rob unsuspecting investors.

What makes me think these things? Have you read the papers of late? If so you would know that the FBI just arrested "Defcon" a couple of days ago and has thrown him in jail, wouldn't you? Well if you would bother to read what the authorities have said after the arrest you would know that the broom is already in motion and that a stark clean up of the Alt world is already quite in progress... ahhh, it will apply to people from outside of the US since European -and other- agencies are fully cooperating, so not only Metcalf as an American resident will be object of the incoming clean up, but also some of his associates from overseas too.

So contrary to your delusions, I don't have questions, I have answers. Not that I have any hopes they will be of any satisfaction to you, of course, but there are solid answers nonetheless.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
This is hilarious. I knew XC was junk right from the start.

whats hilarious, is leewilsons strange obsession, and the fact this thread is still around. lol

you don't have to read it. Answer the questions or be quit.

tempted to " be quit"

What questions are you referring to?

If its anything spoetnik has posted, you will have to decipher it for me, his posts hurt my brain so i skip them.

leewilsons tend to be long winded and irrelevant (see my last post.)

What brain? If you would have any you wouldn't be posting the biased bull crap you continue posting 24/7 defending the indefensible. Dan Metcalf is a LIAR. Dan Metcalf doesn't even know the meaning of ethical. Dan Metcalf is a paid co-conspirator to steal the money of people in many coins. Dan Metcalf belongs in jail... and that's exactly where he will end up sooner rather than later... along with quite a few others, including the dictator that runs XC's thread. Time is running out and they can try to run but there's no place to hide. The Feds are on the hunt and it is just a matter of time the clean up machine arrives and puts the trash in jail.

It will be quite a few months too late already...

/ ramblings of a madman.

Like I said, what questions?

why is Dan a lair? why is everyone going to end up in jail?

I'm not part of the XC/Blocknet team, but I have read pretty much every post from both sides.

What makes you think these things?

Seriously... ask me some questions. I highly doubt I could answer any that haven't already been answered, but ill try.





and you wonder why there i so many topics and posts on this Blocknet-gate Scandal ?
because you decided to ignore the previous 30 pages and say... why why why why
and then it gets explained.. yet again  Roll Eyes
oh and by the way there is other topics too if this one does not suit your tastes..
maybe go read them ?

i'd say read the link in my sig but i took it out after my topic was killed and buried.
since i got asked by PM i might as well post it here too.

Quote
i created a few topics before other guys did eh.
i made my own central topic for the Blocknet crap before the one everyone uses now and kept it updated.
had it in my Sig for ages and mods deleted it after a week..

before that they deleted the topic i created called Dan is suing me where the guy did it again on the topic lol

the staff hid the truth and swept away evidence.
there was no reason for them to kill those specific two topics on me eh
i had others on the subject and they ignored those ones..

the last one mods deleted..
[NEWS] Blocknet-Gate Scandal - The Summary (moderated)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--842782

google cache..
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JN1ahIZI3jkJ:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php%3Ftopic%3D842782.0+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

PS:
Thanks for doing the right thing Mr Private Investigator Wink
I have not talked to you via PM in a while LOL
I do appreciate you tipping me off on some stuff before
but as you can see they simply watch me like a hawk and then delete the topic when the crowd is not looking.

edit:
By the way Dan is a massive liar.. he makes up crap outright blatantly.
check this out..

He said this..

Quote
I was warned by a few parties that a FUD campaign was being planned by some SDC holders (the SDC devs were not implicated). Having recently dropped out of participating in the Blocknet, there had apparently been some conflict of opinion between their dev team and some of their major investors.
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

WRONG there was nothing planned at all.. all of us are just random guys that had enough period.

"smear campaign" he says ? uhh NO he was caught trying to scam everyone for (up to) a million dollars and
is trying to lie his way out of it and actually has the nerve to keep pushing the damn scam LOL
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
This is hilarious. I knew XC was junk right from the start.

whats hilarious, is leewilsons strange obsession, and the fact this thread is still around. lol

you don't have to read it. Answer the questions or be quit.

tempted to " be quit"

What questions are you referring to?

If its anything spoetnik has posted, you will have to decipher it for me, his posts hurt my brain so i skip them.

leewilsons tend to be long winded and irrelevant (see my last post.)

What brain? If you would have any you wouldn't be posting the biased bull crap you continue posting 24/7 defending the indefensible. Dan Metcalf is a LIAR. Dan Metcalf doesn't even know the meaning of ethical. Dan Metcalf is a paid co-conspirator to steal the money of people in many coins. Dan Metcalf belongs in jail... and that's exactly where he will end up sooner rather than later... along with quite a few others, including the dictator that runs XC's thread. Time is running out and they can try to run but there's no place to hide. The Feds are on the hunt and it is just a matter of time the clean up machine arrives and puts the trash in jail.

It will be quite a few months too late already...

/ ramblings of a madman.

Like I said, what questions?

why is Dan a lair? why is everyone going to end up in jail?

I'm not part of the XC/Blocknet team, but I have read pretty much every post from both sides.

What makes you think these things?

Seriously... ask me some questions. I highly doubt I could answer any that haven't already been answered, but ill try.



Pages:
Jump to: