Topic: [SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed - page 12. (Read 100174 times)

tempted to " be quit"

What questions are you referring to?

If its anything spoetnik has posted, you will have to decipher it for me, his posts hurt my brain so i skip them.

leewilsons tend to be long winded and irrelevant (see my last post.)

you don't have to read it. Answer the questions or be quit.

whats hilarious, is leewilsons strange obsession, and the fact this thread is still around. lol

If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.

If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.

This is hilarious. I knew XC was junk right from the start.

Several of the most vocal accounts FUDDing Blocknet and XC with topics and posts have been found to be all sock puppet accounts of the same person: Unicornfarts, Danisdone, rdnkjdi.

I also suspect several other accounts to be by the same person but unlike the above I have no proof so I won't post yet.

It's amazing how much damage just a couple of people can do with determination and fake accounts.

there is nothing on google for "BK: 44055 notice of federal tax lien" what are those alleged valid documents where did you get them?

Source please.

TL;DR

The US Federal Government among others appear to own any and all development and coins held and which have been held by Dan Metcalf since January 28, 2014 according to public records.
----------------------

Does a US Federal and State Tax Liens Threaten the Ownership of Blocknet and all its holdings?
I believe so and I am sure the Feds believe so as well. They tend to sieze all first and ask questions later. Just ask SR 1 & 2.
If all coins were seized, which I would believe bank accts have already been seized.

The lien clearly states:

As provided by section 6321, 6322, and 6323 if the Internal Revenue Service Code, we are giving a notice that taxes (including interest and penalties) have been assessed against the following-named taxpayer. We have made a demand for payment of this liability, but it remains unpaid. Therefore, there is a lien in favor of the United States on all property and rights to property belonging to this taxpayer for the amount of taxes, and additional penalties, interest, and costs that may accrue.

https://i.imgur.com/zId7r7K.png
*I redacted out his spouse's name and address of the rental home it was sent to.

One might argue that the lien amount is not as much as the total value of the coins held currently.
True, but as history has shown they tend to seize everything until it is heard in court.
If that happens then by the time the court case was heard the coins value would have dropped to nil imo.
This also does not include the liens held by the state regarding state income taxes and property taxes along with other creditors.
And I am sure they are going to love the $20,000+ paid to coders on elance.com

This type of activity seems to be a constant issue in this individuals history for around 10 years at least.
Consistently not paying federal, state and property taxes.
The state seems to have seized his home before the feds could get to it.
If he does not believe in paying taxes (16th amendment, sovereign man) more power to him, but
when you know you have a federal tax lien and other liens issued against you knowing that they claim anything and everything until it is paid and you choose to take innocent peoples money and risk it all is revolting.

No paid services were used to glean this information. It took less than 10-15 minutes to find this info. And this was after seeing a 2nd dui arrest (which he was found not guilty for) through a simple google search. I have no idea about the first dui arrest or any other criminal arrests. The fact that he has gone public with his identity around 5 months ago, at which time all of this info was readily available.

And no one, out of all the pages within the threads of both xc and block, all the different coin communities involved with block, all the coin reviews and exchanges, saw this?
Regarding CoinsSource POD (proof of dung?), I saw where they were questioned about researching Dan after they made a comment regarding Dan being an reputable business owner. They said they stood by their comment. Reputable and having a reputation are two different things. The first business I see of his was shut down due to court order according to records. The latest business seems to have multiple family members as signatories. I'm not here to speculate why.

I guess I should start contracting out my services. To paraphrase Dan, "I need to feed my family".

I see no releases of the liens generated by the IRS and state on record. I can provide a much more detailed report with all pertinent documents, but I am not being paid to do so. I have no reason to lie. I was not invested in any of the coins in the network.  I ran across the original prom chatlog and took an interest.  Simple as that.  This complete post is my opinion from reviewing the instruments found of record.

Will the exchanges lock accounts now? Are they required to by law? Or will their legal teams advise them to do so as a precaution?

Not from what I am finding. I will edit this post with the info I have. Give me a bit.

EDIT:

coingateway bct thread started by user coingateway activity: 6
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-coingatewaynet-next-gen-instant-altcoin-exchange-spend-ltcdogecloak-724707

User coincle, activity 45, begins acting as the possible owner/support at post #2 & #6

Coincle https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/coincle-175893
[email protected]

Looking at his post history you will find that he starts a thread and is making btc payments to users on the behalf of coingateway.net:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coingatewaynet-is-giving-00001-btc-unlimited-times-just-list-a-business-745558

Searching his email will lead you to the company I posted.

coingateway.net came out of no where and is still shrouded in mystery. coincle seems to be the main contributor to their presence along with answering questions for them and making btc payments on their behalf. coingateway.net is a private domain, their facebook claims to be based out of london and http://www.dogecoin.link/item/coingateway/ shows them located in newark, new jersey.

My opinion is that they are one and the same. What have you found?

isn't coingateway different then coincle-limited?

https://www.opencompany.co.uk/company/09224948/coingateway-limited

~What is coincle-limited and why are you associating it with coingatway?

If anyone has any questions I will be happy to answer them!

If anyone has any questions I will be happy to answer them!

Has anyone looked into the neutral third party auditor, coingateway.net, that will be one of the proposed main gatekeepers of blocknet funds?

From what I can find, the company seems to be owned by one individual age 19 (as of last month)
Bangladeshi national living in Glascow, Scotland, UK
using an address that is virtual office
by the name of Nasim Akther.
https://www.opencompany.co.uk/company/SC463480/coincle-limited

Blocknets market cap going up has nothing to do with those who made some profit on the 10% discount, considering supernets market cap is 8x higher, there is plenty of room for blocknet to grow or outgrow supernet

Do you have any evidence that the many concerns that were raised were nought but a 'smear campaign' and, more importantly, were from a competitor?

Because simply dismissing the valid concerns of people who were being critical of this ITO and those behind it, isn't helpful and paints you as somebody who will simply declare everything that doesn't agree with you to be FUD.