Topic: [SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed - page 18. (Read 100177 times)

Excellent work Coolstoryteller !
Fascinating stuff for sure.. thanks for sharing.

As with anyone here with a brain we all take things with a grain of salt..
at least those of us that don't sweep things under the rug by crying FUD every two minutes.

Hey investors if anyone to do with any coin uses the term "FUD".. turn around and run !

If there was ever a time for what FUD actually means it is in our Altcoin scene around the world.
Anyone that cries FUD is covering lies and prob because they scared bag holders.
and me thinks poor Bobby got a little cocky thinking he's Rockstar and can handle it (pumping Blocknet etc)
Good luck with that guy  

PS:
I told everyone a few days ago you were pushing Blocknet didn't i Bobby
Thanks for coming out and confirming what i said LOL

So Prom retired and stepped out of the picture ? hmm he's been quiet (While Bobby has been active spouting off)
Hmm so we got two groups pumping the same coins with ties to the dev(s)
hmmmmm that seem odd don't know guys LOL
And they can run their mouth all they want.. i have one account and i am accountable.. they are not.

Starting see why i suggested maybe Prom = Bob ?

This Clown pyramid scheme is massive LOL'z
The other key players / pump groups etc that are watching and that play in our ALT sandbox too
have to be laughing hard at the amateurs bumbling around like fools LOL
These dishonest clowns had it coming sooner or later they were gonna get tripped up lol
fuck 'em.. drown like rats  

And bobby i have credibility and integrity buddy something you can't BUY big shot  
ohh nooooes i am not cool because i am poor ?
Class Bobby.. class

lol it's so obvious. Who would risk 87 BTC on blocknet without possibility to revert.

Only someone to whom there is no risk.



I'd also be interested in "total transparency" on how the funds are going to be spent. I bet in the first week there's gonna be a 87 BTC payment to "undisclosed contractor for various tasks".

https://i.imgur.com/kdtDsiB.jpg

I've edited my last post to show evidence that LXC's (Libbrexcoin) dev "KidCrypto" has been a member of Bobsurplus's Pump and Dump group for over two months. LXC is also a Blocknet participant. This is proof that the FUD thread dedicated to smearing Shadow is a coordinated campaign by "Altcoin Pros" using noob accounts to mask their true motives. The following quote is taken from the "Altcoin Pros" thread and don't bother deleting it. I've got a screenshot.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/winning-altcoin-picks-monthly-membership-start-earning-stop-losing-now-730494


"[7:26:40 PM] Kid Krypto: My coin is LXC"
KidCrypto = LXC Dev
Logs taken for the Blocknet Skype group: https://www.zerobin.net/?99c41ace76ffa3b9#TjWWhWizGfsmYsNr2AWtcRpUHeNQuyh18udJ1t+h01c=

Logs were confirmed by Argakiig the SSD lead developer.

Called that one.

Dan Metcalf is now making baseless accusations implying foul play from SDC's lead dev Rynomster and the encrypted messaging (EM) system he built for CINNI. Dan has really lost it.. another failed perspective management operation by XC to focus attention away from their stained business relationships.



Here's a quote from the CINNI dev regarding the matter:


Since he's on the topic of EM systems, let's revisit XC's "XChat" system.

So Dan says he has been coding for so many years. I'm sure he is well aware of the real XChat client (http://xchat.org/) which has been around since 1999 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Chat) It's one of the oldest chat clients around. It's puzzling that a dev with "30 years" of experience under his belt would name a chat client XChat. Apparently he has no issues ripping off names from other products like he did with Darkcoin and it's original name XCoin (XCO).

Dan claims his XC's EM system is coded from scratch. However, the "XChat" code is closed source so we can't compare the two but we can look at the timeline here.

On June 12, 2014, 11:43:20 PM Rynomster completed the EM system for CINNI.



On August 14th XC released their "XChat" EM system which is still closed sourced.

Dan advises against throwing stones in glass houses.. yet he shit where he sleeps. The amount of bullshit misinformation coming from the XC cultists is alarming. How can anyone continue to believe the lies coming out of the XC camp? These attempts to smear SDC by the XC community and staff seem really desperate:

Spoetnik was hired by SDC = False
I hired Aleppo to write the article = False
SDC devs planned a smear operation against XC = False
Rynomstr was the lead CINNI dev = False

Protip: Instead of focusing of diversion, focus on the evidence presented. Your story changes from day to day if you were telling the truth it would be the same story from day 1.


Moving forward. In case anyone here missed the XC -Bitswift- Bobsurplus connection:

Bitswift (https://twitter.com/bit_swift)  a.k.a Coinada (he deleted his twitter since this thread went up - https://twitter.com/Coinada) a.k.a bitcad4u (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcad4u-134027) is a long term XC holder and Bobsurplus's right hand man. He is also the lead "developer" for blocknet participant Bitswfit. His screen shot is in the OP



Back in August we exposed another Bobsurplus/Coinada scam where he admitted to alone owning 20%+ of LXC the coin supply while his group held "way more" than him. LXC is another Blocknet participant.. The people within the LXC community looked at the leak as "FUD" instead of a scam warning. As a result there are numerous LXC bagholders still in denial like Tranglee, Emiliomann and the rest of the goof troop that follow Bob around from coin to coin supporting his dumps.


https://twitter.com/CryptoBoh/status/502836784704012289

Ironically Bob was one of the first to post in this thread to let everyone know he doesn't invest in scams.


Interesting... Robert Duskes Jr a.k.a BobSurplus a.k.a Coinflipper a.k.a EMC2Whale a.k.a AltcoinPros a.k.a Coingekko a.k.a CoinStarX:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom/1324-lexington-avenue-286-new-york-10128/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom-robert-bradley-bob-duskes-robert-bradley-duskes-used-to-646481


More on the LXC dev

The LXC dev is so shady he even started a thread dedicated to spew out Bobsurplus propaganda to FUD the SDC community. What kind of dev promotes the use of noob accounts to FUD other projects? One that is on Bob's Payroll.

PoopieLaxitive31 = KidCrypto (the developer of LXC)

Logs taken for the Blocknet Skype group: https://www.zerobin.net/?99c41ace76ffa3b9#TjWWhWizGfsmYsNr2AWtcRpUHeNQuyh18udJ1t+h01c=

These logs were confirmed by Argakiig the lead SSD developer in the public #bittrex IRC channel.

It exposed the LXC dev for being a shady bitch. Shortly after making the FUD thread against SDC he came into IRC and asked me if he could PM me if he had any issues coming from anyone in the SDC community. I told him we don't allow FUD in our thread and I would remove anything that was baseless. Mind you the enitre time this conversation was going on he was FUDpacking SDC on his thread under the alias Poopielaxative31. The below message came from him via PM on btctalk:


Above here is stone cold evidence that the LXC dev is nothing but a scam artist and another one of Bobsurplus's bitches.. what a shame..

Here is the thread KidCrypto ak.a. Pooplaxitive31 a.k.a. LXCdev created: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-full-truth-behind-shadowcashcoin-trolls-and-their-attacks-on-other-coins-818939

My full rebuttal to the LXC devs claims: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9416289

The intermingling of BobSurplus projects into Blocknet, the integrity of the developers involved (aside from the SSD dev argakiig), the relationship between Coinada-XC and XC's attempts to smear SDC should draw up some serious red flags for anyone thinking about participating in this money grab. People can believe whatever the hell they want to believe but the connections ARE there. XC and blocknet participants should focus less on attacking SDC and more on their own shady business relationships.

It is like explaining it to Jim Jones' Jamestown residents at the kool-aid handout.

Lol delusion level epic.

This gone b fun

To be frank, that statement makes you an idiot.

A "smart" investor would have at least used bittrex with a confirmed buy back period if they were in it for the long haul.

Has the escrow news been released?

very few are going to dump. The 87 btc buy order confirms smart investors can see through this fud 

Jesus H. Facepalm.......

 

I hope there is enough sell back to constitute the shut down. But the 87btc buy at bter today makes that much harder.
I am in complete agreement with you regarding them actually letting it die. They won't and can't.

It would really be a huge/impossible task to try to offer a buy back of all the coins because of the way they set it all up to begin with.

For instance, how would they prevent those who bought from poloni under market value selling back into them at full price and the same with the bter dump* of 8002 coins (*that was still never addressed by them that I saw) or block that were bought at a discount via coingateway

I am anxiously awaiting their escrow news being released. I have a feeling it is about to get even more messy.

watch - so many poeple will dump there will be less than the required amount to do the project.  But then XC will say "we are going to move forward with the project anyway" just to keep the remaining btc

Yes. They made the announcement 4 days ago or so:
https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203325664-BlockNet-ITO-What-happened-and-next-steps-

so now bittrex is putting a buywall for block i hear. apparently we werent the only ones that saw what a mess it is.

Here is their post regarding this:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9445639

These guys never stop moving the goal posts daily

They removed the sell wall from Poloniex early.

I'm guessing this is so they can have someone pump it or something so that people see a higher price and won't refund their BLOCK on Bittrex.

Lets see if that's what happens...

Yep! I strongly suggest to stop Dansing; we're not at a party here!!1

My thoughts exactly. I could hardly get past the title containing "smear campaign against blocknet".
If that is not the most biased load then I do not know what is. And it does not even touch on the heart of the issues.
They just keep brushing past the meat and addressing a few points and calling it all cleaned up.

Just like the other rag, coinssource, who had the audacity to say that Dan Metcalf was a "reputable small business owner".
When I questioned them regarding any investigation that they performed or if they believed "reputable" meant someone who owes large amounts of cash to multiple people, they said they stood by their statement. I searched the irc chat they had with Dan Metcalf and I saw nothing mentioned regarding small business ownership so how did they know he owned a business and if he was reputable? For them to make that statement means they did not do any research whatsoever. And to think they also provide POD services...WHAT?!? You can't make this bs up.