Pages:
Author

Topic: [SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed - page 17. (Read 100095 times)

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
Oulalala!

A scandal has affected the Litecoin community and is going to explosed…in a face of those who are holding or are about to buy XC

Jasin Lee became recently the biggest scammer in Litecoin history by scamming more than 2,000,000$ with a fake/fail ASIC project ( Fibonacci)

https://litecointalk.org/index.php/topic,2702.0.html

This guys is also FULL MEMBER of the XC dev team:

http://www.xc-official.com/assets/pdfs/14-07-08%20The%20XC%20Team.pdf

You should re-considered the INTEGRITY of these people and really questioned wether or not this project is just an other pump and dump coin  Wink

Peace

You cheeky fudding bastard, Jasin Lee is no longer part of the XC team:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8720311

"Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee

Hello all

We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee.

Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time.

Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC.

As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way.

We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature.

Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC."
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Oulalala!

A scandal has affected the Litecoin community and is going to explosed…in a face of those who are holding or are about to buy XC

Jasin Lee became recently the biggest scammer in Litecoin history by scamming more than 2,000,000$ with a fake/fail ASIC project ( Fibonacci)

https://litecointalk.org/index.php/topic,2702.0.html

This guys is also FULL MEMBER of the XC dev team:

http://www.xc-official.com/assets/pdfs/14-07-08%20The%20XC%20Team.pdf

You should re-considered the INTEGRITY of these people and really questioned wether or not this project is just an other pump and dump coin  Wink

Peace
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I'm dying.
^

There's something called respect. Even on the internet.
You lack of respect.

You gotta return back to the reality. I haven't invested in this ICO nor I know what's going on. Most of stuff I saw here are too hard to follow, because of 15 groups talking bullshit with newbie accounts.
Not taking anyone's side, especially yours. You're a racist/fascist, a stubborn troll, someone who has no meaning in life and harasses people online.

You're a paranoid f*, lol.

Quote
your attempt to discredit people with your comment and the next one following it failed miserably.. try again.

How? By saying:

Quote
Can't believe how much time some people have dedicated to this topic.
I'm amazed.
? LMAO.

Here's my answer:
Quote
your attempt to discredit people with your comment and the next one following it failed miserably.. try again.

Hope you don't think that the entire world is spinning around you? Nor that everyone is against you.
But yeah, you're one of the most paranoid/attention whoring people I've seen in this forum. You're lying yourself and trying to prove something which -MIGHT- be true, but you're attacking everyone who comes with a valid argument. - That's a sheep, my friend.
Even your typing style gives me a headache.

And hell yeah, the only thing that matters is the damn buck. This is how some people work. For some people this is a profitable business.
You're mad for some reason, I don't care why. Just don't direct your bullshit to me like that. You don't even know me.

There will always be sheep and the ones who take their money. Turn around you, check the world outside. Wake up.

I hope I made a new enemy today. The ones I've got have rusted a bit.
Truth hurts.

Peace out.

PS: "Bitcoin"= Network. "bitcoin", the currency itself. Thought you'd knew that after so many years in Bitcoin forum.

EDIT: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moderation-of-possible-fud-and-insults-787267
You can read.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Can't believe how much time some people have dedicated to this topic.
I'm amazed.




some people care about being scammed or better yet SUPPORTING scams.
clearly.. you.. do not.

let me guess, the only thing that matters is what your left with after you subtract the scam coin purchase price from your dump price ?

admit it, most of you have told me word for word for years how you don't care what you invest in as long as you get a Bitcoin profit. FACT !

funny enough many of you older regulars actually had the nerve to try and argue and justify that cancerous behavior arguing with me about it for ages too..
i remember all of you doing it rather clearly  Roll Eyes
so uhh it's funny many of you open your mouths...... at all.

more info has continued to come out from more and more sources, this is not dedication it is diversification.
your attempt to discredit people with your comment and the next one following it failed miserably.. try again.

..i can't believe some of you are still working over time trying to sweep this shit under the rug.
member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Can't believe how much time some people have dedicated to this topic.
I'm amazed.

I second this. Just lol.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I'm dying.
Can't believe how much time some people have dedicated to this topic.
I'm amazed.


legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Bob.. admitting AFTER hearing the infamous problems you BOUGHT Blocknet and then,
called us "poor" FUD'ing Trolls i think means.. your joining Danny boy in the rep dept. LOL

sorry but *if that quote (posted earlier) of you admitting it is true then i have officially lost the last shred of respect i might have ever had for you.

and the.. they are just poor and jealous routine is simply pathetic.
i'd hang out with poor people with a decent attitude over a snobby rich jerk any day of the week Smiley

further more your Paid member group / Pump team type of antics sure as hell didn't put you in my good books previously.

feel free to keep laughing it up as your account / rep here is now effectively dead..
you drew a line in the sand between money grubbing corrupt tag along's
and the rest of us that choose integrity and honesty and supporting crypto first
..not money  Roll Eyes

The fact you led a group alone was not enough for me to have a negative view on your actions etc.
what was, is choosing to support Blocknet when enough info should have made it clear you should stay away.

so you made your bed and i can assure you.. you WILL sleep in it trust me.

Tweeting or buying a btc of blocknet does not put me in bed with those guys... Also.. A few of the coins I hold are now part of blocknet... of course Ima promote it a bit in order to bring more value to my underlying asset which was some coins in the blkocknet..

At this point though I believe blocknet is a fail and ima stay as far away from it as possible for now. I'll hope for the best but expect the worst.. Too bad though. It was a nice project idea.


i did not say you were in bed with them at any point.
what i said is you supported them and any coin that buys or uses a coin etc that is not reputable is "support" ..there is not way around it.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Living the dream
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
Bob.. admitting AFTER hearing the infamous problems you BOUGHT Blocknet and then,
called us "poor" FUD'ing Trolls i think means.. your joining Danny boy in the rep dept. LOL

sorry but *if that quote (posted earlier) of you admitting it is true then i have officially lost the last shred of respect i might have ever had for you.

and the.. they are just poor and jealous routine is simply pathetic.
i'd hang out with poor people with a decent attitude over a snobby rich jerk any day of the week Smiley

further more your Paid member group / Pump team type of antics sure as hell didn't put you in my good books previously.

feel free to keep laughing it up as your account / rep here is now effectively dead..
you drew a line in the sand between money grubbing corrupt tag along's
and the rest of us that choose integrity and honesty and supporting crypto first
..not money  Roll Eyes

The fact you led a group alone was not enough for me to have a negative view on your actions etc.
what was, is choosing to support Blocknet when enough info should have made it clear you should stay away.

so you made your bed and i can assure you.. you WILL sleep in it trust me.

Tweeting or buying a btc of blocknet does not put me in bed with those guys... Also.. A few of the coins I hold are now part of blocknet... of course Ima promote it a bit in order to bring more value to my underlying asset which was some coins in the blkocknet..

At this point though I believe blocknet is a fail and ima stay as far away from it as possible for now. I'll hope for the best but expect the worst.. Too bad though. It was a nice project idea.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Bob.. admitting AFTER hearing the infamous problems you BOUGHT Blocknet and then,
called us "poor" FUD'ing Trolls i think means.. your joining Danny boy in the rep dept. LOL

sorry but *if that quote (posted earlier) of you admitting it is true then i have officially lost the last shred of respect i might have ever had for you.

and the.. they are just poor and jealous routine is simply pathetic.
i'd hang out with poor people with a decent attitude over a snobby rich jerk any day of the week Smiley

further more your Paid member group / Pump team type of antics sure as hell didn't put you in my good books previously.
seems a cloud of negative reputation had followed you around for ages in the scene already..

feel free to keep laughing it up as your account / rep here is now effectively dead..
you drew a line in the sand between money grubbing corrupt tag along's
and the rest of us that choose integrity and honesty and supporting crypto first
..not money  Roll Eyes

The fact you led a group alone was not enough for me to have a negative view on your actions etc.
what was, is choosing to support Blocknet when enough info should have made it clear you should stay away.

so you made your bed and i can assure you.. you WILL sleep in it trust me.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale


Can you please replace the pic of me and my 2 buddies with the pic of me with some of my AltCoinPros members from our recent trip to Amsterdam.

Here is a link to the pic: https://twitter.com/EMC2Whale/status/523551719049801728

Thanks

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
i heard bittrex is putting a buywall up for block. is this happening for all the exchanges or are they the only one? and what if we bought with  another coin? any offical info on all this?

Only Bittrex https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203325664-BlockNet-ITO-What-happened-and-next-steps-

They are doing it to compensate open trading on Poloniex

yeah polo dropped the ball a little bit on this deal. oh well should mean less supply of coins and higher value hopefully.

Not the case at all.  I negotiated the terms of the crowdsale for Poloniex.  I made it abundantly clear to the Blocknet team multiple times that trade would be open on Poloniex in both the NHZ and BTC BLOCK markets.  Blocknet was well aware of the arrangement.  



MobyDick_Poloniex because there seems to be a breakdown as to what is being told to the community versus what is really happening would you please let us know some more things.

When you were approached to pull down the sell wall, what reasoning were you given?

Did it violate the agreement you originally had with blocknet?

How many total block's were sold on poloniex?

How much btc did it generate?

Were these funds sent to blocknet?

If so, what btc address and who was the blocknet representative that authorized this?

Thank you.

Poloniex was not asked to remove a sell wall.  The developers selling Blocknet were able to deposit and place the wall at the price they chose and with the quantity of BLOCK they deposited.  The removal of the sell wall was entirely up to the developers and did not violate any previously arranged terms.

The total amount of BTC and NHZ raised during the crowdsale has been tallied, and the addresses funds were withdrawn to have been noted.  I have requested authorization to release these details from Dan Metcalf in an email, and will await his decision before posting them.



UPDATE: 

Dan Metcalf has given approval that the following information be made public:

Regarding Blocknet sales on Poloniex:

37.5060983 BTC worth of BLOCK was sold for BTC
14.31655727 BTC worth of BLOCK was bought with BTC

23.185 BTC was the total raised on Poloniex prior to the removal of the sell wall.

BTC raised was sent to

1PvuqFFhQg69KqsKQ96rwR1RDWqgXeqat8 and 1CDaN8NbNDjdbKtFdKiVh2MM9Gky6efncE


32450774.72149716 NHZ worth of BLOCK was sold for NHZ.

NHZ raised was sent to NHZ-PC95-K8VS-MEX5-7Z5K7

I am guessing these are not the multisig escrow wallets that were mentioned in the last couple of days.
These funds were pulled off of poloniex a week ago.
One has had deposits sent to it on and off since July hence potentially comingling funds from somewhere else.
One appears newer.
Both have multiple smaller amounts of btc being sent out of them to multiple different addresses.

Did the board vote for those transactions? Did the auditor approve?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
you seem like the angry ones right now. thats all im saying.  Kiss

legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Hamed fired the wrong guy. Should have fired himself, with a 357 for ease sake.

To the XC pricks who keep coming here to remind everyone about a smear campaign, save yourself some time. No one gives a flying fuck other than you stupid brainwashed retards about who keeps bringing things to light. There was a reason no one was buying your scam coin for months. Staying in the moderated echo chamber based thread and mutual butt scratching has just trained you guys the wrong way. Everyone outside of the well you were living in already knew about Dan Madoff Metcalf being a slimy cuntrag.

Instead of asking him for credentials and publications and whitepapers you keep throwing gibberish here that no one cares for. Go back to butt scratching the 5 other retards and their sockpuppets that have Excee coins.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Unpleasant. I believed I am being very reserved knowing I am purposely being giving false answers to very legitimate questions.
You gave me a business name to back up the claims of successful/reputable business owner that does not exist in relation to Dan Metcalf. Period.
I gave you the business names that do and when I call you out that you are giving me false information you then decide to delete the posts.

Get over it Lee. You would be very entitled to think that you can legitimately ask about Dan's life.

He has already made his identity public. Any further details are strictly above and beyond the call of duty.

If you're not comfortable with that, just go away and don't buy BLOCK.

And all that trash about censorship and whatnot is profoundly disanalogous to what we have here. Your concerns about Dan's business are *not* legitimate because it is his *private* concern.



AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! + eleventy billion

You can't be serious. Do you really believe this? I never asked anything about Dan's personal life.

I had no earthly idea that Dan Metcalf had a business at all until it was claimed by yourself, community members, POD sources-CoinsSource, etc., etc.
And whenever Metcalf's current/past business was brought up it was always brought up in a positive light to evidence him as a success in someway. This was done to further promote the dev of the coin otherwise it would never be mentioned.

Secondly, this might be hard to imagine outside of a dictatorship, but the act of owning a business is a public matter and not private in the least. Within the blocknet documentation itself it is said that a business will be created with the one intention of it being to make the coin public.

You had no problem throwing the name of his business out there to me until I told you that business does not exist and which time you promptly deleted the posts.

Lets walk through a simple example.

I hear through the grapvine about a great bicycle to buy.
Upon further research I read that the bicycle maker has a successful similar business.
I also read a bicycle magazine review that states that the bicycle maker is a reputable small business owner.
I call the bicycle company and speak to their PR.
I ask PR what are these other businesses that the bicycle owner owns and PR says the name.
I research that company and find that it does not exist.
I call PR back to question this. PR hangs up.
I call back and ask again. I am told that the bicycle makers other business/businesses are his private concern.

Makes perfect sense and is extremely sound.

If I would have purchased a bicycle previous to my researching the non existing business then any court in the world would rule that as fraud.
If I would have purchased a bicycle previous to speaking to PR then many courts/juries would still find in my favor regarding deceptive business practices,
bait and switch type of scenario.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
For those of you who are fans of sweet sweet justice, the journalist behind the scandalous Blocknet "Scam" article has been fired.





Edward Snowden was fired too along with many people especially journalists that were doing excellent jobs because the powers that be wanted to line their pockets instead.


Really???



 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
For those of you who are fans of sweet sweet justice, the journalist behind the scandalous Blocknet "Scam" article has been fired.





Edward Snowden was fired too along with many people especially journalists that were doing excellent jobs because the powers that be wanted to line their pockets instead.

The rag called Coin Source who has done the POD for Dan Metcalf of Blocknet and claims that Dan Metcalf is a reputable small business owner, but they will neither back this information up nor have they done any research in that regard.

Sorry to hear a journalist was fired because they wrote something that would have called into question CoinsSource's POD trust system.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
For those of you who are fans of sweet sweet justice, the journalist behind the scandalous Blocknet "Scam" article has been fired.




sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
The stories are beginning to fall apart and if you point that out then they become the gestapo.
Instead of brown shirts maybe they are the block shirts with their pr guru parroting "smear campaign" every chance he gets.

i heard bittrex is putting a buywall up for block. is this happening for all the exchanges or are they the only one? and what if we bought with  another coin? any offical info on all this?

Only Bittrex https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203325664-BlockNet-ITO-What-happened-and-next-steps-

They are doing it to compensate open trading on Poloniex

yeah polo dropped the ball a little bit on this deal. oh well should mean less supply of coins and higher value hopefully.

And you care why exactly? 

I call BS that you own any, or you do own some and practiced really shady antics by being at the heart of the FUD storm against BlockNet, XC, Dan, and synechist, to prevent the ITO from selling out, which it probably would have.

nah not a fud storm dude, i bought this before the whole debacle with the the XC premine and my first thought was its going to reflect on block, if you dont see that i dont know what to tell you. If i didnt own any i would have stayed out of all of it. you cant blame investors when shit like this goes down. i didnt spend the premine he did so if you want to be mad at someone be mad at him. i thought this was a good concept up until all this crap but if you cant see how the things the head dude has done are going to affect this project i cant help you. getting mad at me or anyone else who is asking questions is like blaming the slot machine when you lose. i got into this because the guys from fibre were involved and that is what i paid with if it really matters to you that much.

I don't blame you for being naive and believing the FUD, I'm sure alot of investors are caught in the crosshairs not sure what to believe. But There are a few of us here that have been with XC since may, and we could quite easily discredit alot of the FUD. Since the start XC has been transparent and public with everything they do, Dan has even run his own successful businesses outside of crypto. If XC's intention was to scam people, it would have happened a long time ago (during the first mega pump or the rev 2 pump). The fact that they are still here, even with the price collapsing proves that they are here for the long run. People are just quick to assume that ITO= Scam automatically, and it would be quite easy to set off a FUD campaign with one of the bigger competitors in Anon because we have so many enemies. People that don't even know anything about XC are here trolling and Fudding, and if they would have follwed XC since May, they would realize how completely stupid and idiotic some of this FUD truly is. That's why you will see alot of us early investors of XC are still supportive of everything and can see through all the bullshit that is being tossed around on the mainboard. Dan has delivered several dozens of times for us in the past, and he will continue to do so in the future.

I keep seeing where Dan has run a business where some say it is/was successful (ProfX) and others say it is/was reputable (CoinsSource).

1. What business of his are you speaking of specifically? ATC Solutions? or Wireless Broadband Systems? or XC, Inc.?
I don't know if the last one even got off the ground or if it was scraped.

2. How do you know any of these businesses were successful or not? Did you look at the books?
I am certain you did not just go off of the word of the owner that would be the definition of naive.

ATC Corp.


Although my question is specific to ProfX's claim to a successful business, I guess you could attempt to answer that but you seemed to have missed the actual questions.

Regarding your answer as "ATC Corp.", are you referring to ATC Solutions?
If not, I do not see an ATC Corp. registered to a Dan Metcalf or even existing in the state that his other businesses were, so:

In what state is this ATC Corp. incorporated?
Is it a LLC or Inc.?
What year was it started?
How do you personally know whether it was successful or reputable?
I have a feeling that you have no earthly idea and are only regurgitating what you have been fed, but it is worth a shot.
If that is not the case, then feel free to shed some actual light on this subject.
Pages:
Jump to: