According to your ToS or rules, whatever you say, you are confiscating money because you want to prevent funds from being stolen and you are trying to get the fund back to the rightful owner as you said above. Now, since you have refunded 10% (no confirmation yet though), how will you send the full money back to the original if this fund is stolen?
Read carefully, at the moment the user has received the full amount.
We are not engaged in investigating theft or finding the rightful owner, this is what the crypto exchange is doing. If they approve the transaction and credit the account, we complete the order. If not, we request additional information through them.
We do not make a scam. We just exchange currencies, but sometimes users with high-risk money come along and make problems like this. For some reason, you all took his side. I absolutely don't understand why. Who can explain to me?
Funds were frozen because their risk was Stolen 100%
The user has already received all his money
why are there even cases where you kept 10% of such funds, although, in the end, it turned out that it had no negative impact on your accounts?
We will think about it.
Can you please tell us what third party exchanges are you using, and do you use one or more accounts with them?
We use WhiteBIT and Binance
It doesn't make any sense that sending any documents would unfreeze your account and coins, if names from documents don't match.
We only resend kyc identification to crypto exchange support, we don't make a decisions.
Since the user refused to provide any information, I talked to the support of the exchange and they agreed to receive at least a textual justification for the funds. The user provided this and the funds were unfrozen.
Check my username https://openchange.cash/bitcointalk.txt
After that you can decide if you want to accept his coins or not.
Very few exchanges provide multiple addresses for deposits. We will think about it. Thank you.
Victim? It's funny. High-risk funds are sent to me, but you call the sender a victim. I can not believe this.
I want to stop this discussion. Perhaps we will revise our rules regarding AML and additional fees.