Topic: Scammer: Inaba (Read 8353 times)

lol... for how much?

Par for the course around here as of later unfortunately.

He has contributed rather substantial BTC amounts for advertising purposes, huh ?

I can't imagine why Theymos is giving him safe-haven. Ill-gotten gains co-mingled with forums advertising funds and all...

Because he blows the site operator.

HOW IS IT THAT INABA DOES NOT HAVE A SCAMMER TAG?!?


He Was Paid by BFL to systematically LIE to the consumers ON THIS FORUM. He was a MAJOR player in this Scam. If it werent for Inaba's constant LIE's
and FUD;  Millions of dollars would of NOT been spent on BFL's garbage hardware.
 

These are Facts:
Before Inaba became BFL_JOSH he was a VERY well respected member of this community. He ran a pool and he had been around about as long as I have (2011) . People trusted him, flat out. and he SOLD THAT TRUST TO BFL.

HE KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY USED HIS INFLUENCE ON THIS FORUM IN ORDER TO BOLSTER BFL'S CREDIBILITY, He sold his right not to have a scammer tag to BFL.

 
Lets look at the definition of the word scammer shall we?


According to Princeton university Inaba aka BFL_Josh aka Josh Zerlan is the DEFINITION of a scammer.

Bitcointalk Admins? how can you argue with this?

And your position today?  Is Inaba a scammer?

BFL Fanbois: *Consider yourself in Contempt!*

Camp Lugan: *Josh Zerlan, did BFL submit their product line to the FCC?*

BFL Fanfois: BFL's miner don't need to be FCC certified! Don't answer the question, Josh. It's a trap!

Josh Zerlan: I'll answer the question!

[to Phinnaeus Gage]

Josh Zerlan: You want answers?

Phinnaeus Gage: I think us monumental assholes are entitled to.

Josh Zerlan: *You want answers?*

Phinnaeus Gage: *We want the truth!*

Josh Zerlan: *You can't handle the truth!*
[pauses, to wipe the jeez from his chin]

Josh Zerlan: Sonny lived in a room that had walls, and one of those walls had bars guarded by men with guns. Who else has been there? You? You, PL? You, K9? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for those who've ordered or yet to order, then you curse BF Labs Inc. You have that luxury here on BitcoinTalk. You have the luxury of not blowing who I blow. Those that ordered, while tragic, probably would have wasted their disposable income on some useless product or service. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, directs that money to Butterfly Labs. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about in your panties, you want me to con moneys from them fools, you need me to con moneys from them fools. We use words like "in two weeks", "making hardware is hard", "we never lie". We use these words as the backbone of BF Labs Inc. You use them as a punchline. We have neither the time nor the inclination to explain ourselves to monumental assholes who rises and sleeps under the blanket of BFL trying to protect the Bitcoin network, and then questions the manner in which we try to do such. We would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a phone and call the FCC, the FTC, the FBI, the IRS, the CIA... Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.

Phinnaeus Gage: Josh Zerlan, did BFL submit their product line to the FCC?*

Josh Zerlan: I said what I was paid for to say, I...

Phinnaeus Gage: *Josh Zerlan, did BFL submit the screen to the FCC?*

Josh Zerlan: *You're Goddamn right they did!* *Provides link.* https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=132722&fcc_id='MSQME370T'

...

Josh Zerlan: [contemptuously] You monumental assholes... you have no idea how to build ASIC-based Bitcoin miners. All you did was weaken a company today, Phinn. That's all you did. You put our profits in danger. Sweet dreams, sonny.

Phinnaeus Gage: Don't call me Sonny. I'm a hero member of BitcoinTalk with the highest post count, and you're a son of a bitch with jeez on your chin. You've been served!

Did not pass, duh!

Where is the Japapeno test report Josh?

Josh probably penned the above in the comforts of his home while his rainbow-color poodle paced back-and-forth wondering when his master is going to take her for a walkie.

Well, guess what happened exactly 63 minutes and 48 seconds later?


Josh provides proof to stick it up my, Bruno Kucinskas', ass by linking to the obsolete forerunner of the Nexus 7, claiming this is what we've been asking for all along.

Well, I got news for you Joshy Boy. Today, I have sent out 5 emails to the FCC, and tomorrow I will be speaking to a live person. Make no mistake, I probably will be stretching the truth a tad to get my point across. You best hope that I'm in a good mood tomorrow, otherwise I may stretch it a helluva lot.

I have to lie, Josh, otherwise if I don't you would be called out as a liar.

GAME ON!

Please forgive me! https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/i-deserve-the-scammer-tag-if-all-those-who-reply-to-thread-are-not-paid-back-278780

Hey Josh,

Where can I verify that you certified your mining equipment with the FCC as required by law?

You seem to be confusing the term "community" with "member of the community."  Once again, I am waiting for you to provide some proof.

He made the claim that he would have the FCC certification in 2 weeks. He has the burden of proof. No one else. Him so if he doesn't produce it he is a liar.

I'm going to troll him until he answers.  If I get banned for it then you'll know Theymos is Joshs bitch.

And silence from Josh...

Big surprise. 

You will never get any answers to that question or any others. If he tells you the truth it proved he lied about the FCC. If he lies it proves he lied about the FCC because there is absolutely no evidence of the FCC ever receiving the unit for testing. If there were FCC approval as he stated there would be there would be a public record of the test. There is none he lied end of debate. So he knows it is best to just keep to attacking the man and or making the straw man his go to argument. He might want to check out IronChariots. http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Category:Logical_fallacies or https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/pdf/Logical_Fallacies_on_A4.pdf ... a few of these you might recognize in Inaba's posts. He really doesn't seem to realize there are countless people here who see very nearly every statement he makes as logical fallacies and he may in fact think he is some sort of great debater but he lacks the basic skills to keep his lies facts straight and his company from being swamped in lawsuits.

His favourites tend to be Ad hominem and Ad hominem abusive and he is particularly adept and trying to make veiled threats to lie about your moral character to your employer to get you "fired", which I think is a grounds for a defamation suit or minimally banning his ass from bitcointalk, so feel free to retain counsel if he does the same to you at some point.

Some of the others he trends with are as follows:

Appeal to popularity
Cherry picking
Straw man
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Argumentum ad verecundiam

And the list goes on and funny enough the "sockpuppet army" that is used in this effort does use a lot of the same and there are countless examples of these "BFL supporters" using the exact same logical fallacies time and time again with the exact same lexical density down the ellipsis and periods used incorrectly. One only wonders if Bitcointalk were a 1 account per person forum a lot of this sort of abuse would immediately end particularly with the trust ratings but hey who cares right BFL is a wonderful company it really adds to the bitcoin economy doesn't it?

There are perfectly good reasons why he never answers but the main one is the goal to obfuscate the real situation as much as possible. Sadly most people can't recognize what that means. What it generally means is people who tend to negotiate or communicate in this way are sociopaths.

Arm yourselves, be aware and point out his logical fallacies and for the multiple accounts under his control that he uses rather frequently given the analysis I have made.

http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/11/18/tricks-of-the-psychopath%E2%80%99s-sociopath%E2%80%99s-and-politician%E2%80%99s-trade/

Inaba is more likely a sociopath than merely a shady morally bankrupt Gordon Gecko wannabe and I would suggest that whatever medication he is being prescribed is monitored more rigidly by his health care professional I truly worry he might be a danger to himself or others given the propensity to focus on individuals, fixating all his attention and then he attempts to lashout actually threatening their livelihoods and professional careers. Gives me the chills just thinking about what he might do if he snaps. It happens all too often in America especially with easy access to weapons.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/inaba-8198

We can start here, if you like?


That was quick! I would pull up more insults towards members of the community, but it seems that your obsession with PG has reached unsafe limits recently in the form that 90% of the posts you make are about him. You may want to get yourself checked out.

By the way, I'm still waiting for the proof that PG embezzled funds from Bitcoin100.

Josh which testing lab do you guys use to certify your products?

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/TestFirmSearch.cfm


You probably use this one, the only one in Kansas, right?


Rogers Labs, Inc.   
Louisburg   
06/27/2016   
Scot Rogers   

4405 West 259th Terrace   
Louisburg   Kansas   66053   
United States   
[email protected]   
913-837-3214   
913-837-3214


See I looked through the 302 tests he's done and I can't seem to find any for "Butterfly Labs".  Did you certify the hardware under a different name??