...
Not sure why you would quote my entire post then claim I had something that which I had not. You're loss, not mine.
I'm not sure what you mean.
Regardless of which if I note any member being held to standards these dirt bags dont hold their pals to, then I will be pointing out their double standards. If I see scammers and willing scam facilitators punishing others for lesser evils then I will be pointing that out. If you want to call it " attacking " then that is your opinion.
I don't care in the least if those i am ensuring get fair treatment want to claim I don't support them and only using them to attack others.
Pushing for fair and equal treatment of all members does not rely of approval of anyone. If those being unfairly punished or having double standards forced upon them dont want my help or try to claim I have ulterior motives. I simply don't care.
The forum continuing on as it had for years free of tyrannical groups intending on creating echo chambers that serve their own needs best is far more important than individual approval or disapproval.
So the next time I see red tags applied to your account that I deem unfair I will be " attacking " those leaving them there all over again.
I deem some of your red tags left as very unreasonable. However since you appear to hold each member to your consistently strange standards then there is no requirement to attempt to punish you for double standards. Those keeping consistently to their own standards may not be entirely suitable for DT where only valid scammer warnings should be placed , but they are not corrupt or colluding they simply have standards I don't agree fit well with providing valuable and credible scammer warnings here.
You seem afraid as everyone else here to put valid warnings on proven scammers accounts. However being afraid is not the same as colluding and clearly benefitting from that collusion. So I would say you are more suitable than 90% of members to be on DT but fall short of my own sensible and more fitting standards that would be based upon objective independently verifiable standards that ensure warnings are only placed on credible financial threats.
Nothing further needs be said.
I will do as I wish. I will ensure you receive fair treatment. You are free to believe what you want regarding my motives.
You are not a scammer that is the most important thing.
To marlboroza - shut the fuck up you scammer supporting piece of sneaky shit.
I don't care about your blathering on what you can or can't delete you pathetic assmuncher.
I will be increasingly putting pressure on chipmixer to drop all scammers and scammer supporters.
Scammers and their supporters should not be being paid at the highest rates to push double standards on others here.
The facts remain
You support scammers
You push double standards
You delete on topic relevant posts from your threads because you can't deal with the truth.
You are currently being paid the highest rates here to do these things.
That is not fair or sensible. That should be addressed. I will address it frequently.
Who would hire moronbozo. A fucking corrupt scammer supporting trust abusing non achieving moron LoL ...
Each time I address you now malboroza the scammer supporting trust abuser sponsored by chipmixer is how I will continue.
Yap away doggie.
It was a sensible first step to remove some of your bogus double standards trust abuse.
Now stop supporting scammers and you will be making some real headway and chipmixer won't be sponsoring scammer supporting trust abusing scum. That would be very sensible.
That reminds me....
