Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 119.

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: ThePhwner on September 02, 2015, 05:13:28 PM

Marcelo has no data center.

First off, this is opinionated data.

If you have such facts, i would most certainly be interested in the public records, detailing the search that has been done on "Marcelo Santos," and the probable cause used for the issuance of a search warrant...

If i must be so blunt:

You have no probable cause for a search warrant.
If you have no search warrant you have not acquired any real facts.
If you have not acquired any real facts, then you have no case against him.
If you have no real case to bring, then his site *WILL* remain.
And finally, while his site remains you still complain, giving him plenty of ammo against *YOU*.

In reverse:

You complain and drive Scrypt.cc's business away.
If Scrypt's business is driven away, Santos loses money.
When he loses money, he brings his probable cause to the proper authorities.
They file a legal procession, and you appear at trial.
He brings this mess that you made for yourself against you, and you *MIGHT* be lucky to escape a prison stay...

If this is not in plain English enough for you:

You are a loudmouth who really doesn't know how the law works surrounding most forms of business.
You also have only as much info against Scrypt.cc as you can fabricate.
And if there has been a search warrant issued, then you already lost your case.

All said, if you have any facts in reserve, then they are all also just made up.
If i left anything out, then it prolly wasn't necessary.

PSA: This Scam Is Little More Than a High School Student's Idea of a Bad Joke. Move along.

Edit: My sig, not yours, LOL...

maokoto

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

✪ NEXCHANGE | BTC, LTC, ETH & DOGE ✪

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 05:01:52 PM

the crypto world never was intended to be what you still desire it to be. Correct me if i'm wrong, bt one must be "greedy or stupid to deal with Scrypt.cc." sounds like someone thinks that any form of Cryptocurrency is designed to be profitable. There is a thing out there that is profitable. It's called a JOB. Mabey you heard of it. I don't need one, 'cuz, you know I'm me. But if you wanted to make money, shoulda found a job, not crypto...

It is Scryptcc who talks about profitability that they do not give afterwards. Agree with the "Job" thing, but they are promising profits, and they are not providing them, so they are lying to steal people's money.

ThePhwner

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

something something Bitcoin

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 04:54:58 PM

Quote from: ThePhwner on September 02, 2015, 04:44:29 PM

b. Right now the OpEx to run a facility full of 600 A2's would far outweigh any mining profits. Do that math kiddo. You know how I know this? I used to help run an actual mining data center. Yes, an actual data center that was hosting a large amount of CoinTerra, HashFaster, AntMiner S4, etc. units. When you're mining at that scale you've got to factor in the OpEx for an entire datacenter including staff. And with Scrypt profitability where it is now, running a facility full of 600 A2s likely means a loss for anyone involved.

Which leads me to believe you quit and got burned when it did out weigh any profits. As you stated, it is definitely expensive, but why work for a data center when you can sit at home, living off some one else's...

But please let me know why it is you came around talking like this when such realities hit home...

There is no profit to be had in mining hardware, and those of us who *DO* own miners do it for fun, not profit.

If you wanted to make money, shoulda kept the job...

Scrypt.cc prolly isn't turning a profit as you say, if they mine. This is at your own expense. When these revelations come to light it leads most to question why the hell you talk.

To you my friend, the sig explains your life story...

Actually, I quit because BitAffNet quit paying its miners and I didn't want to work for a crook. I actually didn't get burned. I was paid my full salary for all weeks worked and wasn't owed anything when I left. That, as you put it, was a real job. And here's the thing kiddo... just because you're an amateur crackpot who's still sitting around trying to run S3s, doesn't mean we all are. If you're not a total moron you can make a decent living off crypto. First hint, you should have sold that S3 months ago. I've actually been talking on this thread for quite a while - you still remain the new kid on the block who refuses to understand all the history involved in this issue.

Why work for a datacenter when you can live off someone else's? Who's? Marcelo has no data center. And the mining operation I have now is small enough to fit in a customized room off the back of my house, which helps keep OpEx in check. Combine that with a standard cycling in and out of new equipment and a commercial power rate, and you have a profitable mining operation, that's really mining, with real hardware.

And once again, I will ask you... what does your uninformed analysis of my crypto activities have to do with the fact that Marcelo is a liar, ScryptCC is a scam, and anyone who invests will lose. That's the bottom line.

The PSA that Scamzi is a scam explains my life story? I'd ask you to explain, but the explanation would invariably be more convoluted than the statement itself. Good luck with your S3 and your paltry investment in Scamzi.

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: cesmak on September 02, 2015, 04:55:21 PM

Kenny don't know nothing about mining, he is digging the grave by himself....... LOL.

I will not talk anymore with such an ignorant about mining tech infos.....

To run my little Antminer s3+ units costs more in electricity than coins i generate, but please inform me how i know so little...

the crypto world never was intended to be what you still desire it to be. Correct me if i'm wrong, bt one must be "greedy or stupid to deal with Scrypt.cc." sounds like someone thinks that any form of Cryptocurrency is designed to be profitable. There is a thing out there that is profitable. It's called a JOB. Mabey you heard of it. I don't need one, 'cuz, you know I'm me. But if you wanted to make money, shoulda found a job, not crypto...

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Kenny don't know nothing about mining, he is digging the grave by himself....... LOL.

I will not talk anymore with such an ignorant about mining tech infos.....

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: ThePhwner on September 02, 2015, 04:44:29 PM

b. Right now the OpEx to run a facility full of 600 A2's would far outweigh any mining profits. Do that math kiddo. You know how I know this? I used to help run an actual mining data center. Yes, an actual data center that was hosting a large amount of CoinTerra, HashFaster, AntMiner S4, etc. units. When you're mining at that scale you've got to factor in the OpEx for an entire datacenter including staff. And with Scrypt profitability where it is now, running a facility full of 600 A2s likely means a loss for anyone involved.

Which leads me to believe you quit and got burned when it did out weigh any profits. As you stated, it is definitely expensive, but why work for a data center when you can sit at home, living off some one else's...

But please let me know why it is you came around talking like this when such realities hit home...

There is no profit to be had in mining hardware, and those of us who *DO* own miners do it for fun, not profit.

If you wanted to make money, shoulda kept the job...

Scrypt.cc prolly isn't turning a profit as you say, if they mine. This is at your own expense. When these revelations come to light it leads most to question why the hell you talk.

To you my friend, the sig explains your life story...

ThePhwner

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

something something Bitcoin

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 04:20:21 PM

Your suggestion of 24 hours is somwhat hard to follow...
I saw in a quoted comment by some one a reference to 6 TH, and i don't know where that came from.
But it has been more than a month since the hacker, and in that time any sort of deployment like this is possible.

I have not and will not browse this thread for any data as it is to large and there is no index of evidence. but using my assessment there need only be 60 GH to hide. 6000/100=60 and therefore can be hidden quite well.

I'm not saying my answer is right. In fact i might be as far flung from the truth as any other user of scrypt.cc. But no one has attempted to "Prove" the hash rate, only to "Disprove." And so i have attempted. If there is only one point, then it falls flat. Everything has a counter, it simply must be found.

There have never been court cases held between 1 party to prove their points against their same points. It would be a funny spoof, perhaps, But for every offence there is a defense. But not all are quite as effective as the rest.

If 60 GH cannot factually be hidden between 3 coins then i'm at the point that i simply have no other alternatives, and will rest my case. However, the admin might not if he ever does decide to sue. That is why i'm trying, as nobody realized that criminals can win law suits too...

Edit: 60 GH can be generated by 600 A2 terminator units, and if the total hash rate available to users is 60 GH, the admin has 6 GH to himself, as that miner produces 110 MH.

Edit 2: After calculating the generation of 6 GH, it would produce in excess of $200 per day. In brazil (who knows...) that kind of cash is hard to come by.

You must have suffered a traumatic brain injury at some point.

1. Marcelo first claimed 850 Gh/s and the total # available post-MHS conversion, as Crestington pointed out, is now 6,000 GHS. 6 fucking terahashes of Scrypt mining power. This, simply does not exist today on the coin networks. Anywhere.

2. You're by far not the first person to give us their insight into what mining HW could produce X hashrate. I don't know where 60 Gh/s is coming from; the original claimed figure was 850 Gh/s. And it's now much higher given the amt of MHS available. That being said,

a. Your analogy of 60 Gh/s worth of A2s came right from your ass, and is nothing but a distraction

b. Right now the OpEx to run a facility full of 600 A2's would far outweigh any mining profits. Do that math kiddo. You know how I know this? I used to help run an actual mining data center. Yes, an actual data center that was hosting a large amount of CoinTerra, HashFaster, AntMiner S4, etc. units. When you're mining at that scale you've got to factor in the OpEx for an entire datacenter including staff, HVAC, generator upkeep, and so on. And with Scrypt profitability where it is now, running a facility full of 600 A2s likely means a loss for anyone involved.

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: cesmak on September 02, 2015, 04:09:37 PM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 04:03:58 PM

Quote from: cesmak on September 02, 2015, 03:59:25 PM

Kenny one small question, how many hash scrypt power claims now scrypt.cc to have on the network ? Look at the network total hash rate for scrypt mining (not sha256 aka BTC) and tell me where is this hashing power ....

To be honest, it is incalculable as the site hasn't posted the possession of hash rate almost ever. I don't know what the suggested total "Hash power" is or where the hell the number came from, But at any given time some of it is in constant possession. The admin has been run off by barbarians with torches and pitchforks, as would any sane person. To get that info we'd need it from the horses mouth, and he's not talking...

Ok you ask facts, but if someone ask you facts you deny to search them....

And tell me how is possible that in one day the power passed from Khs to Mhs so 10 time the previous power, don't you think that deploy such a huge quantity of hashing power need more than one day......

Your suggestion of 24 hours is somwhat hard to follow...
I saw in a quoted comment by some one a reference to 6 TH, and i don't know where that came from.
But it has been more than a month since the hacker, and in that time any sort of deployment like this is possible.

I have not and will not browse this thread for any data as it is to large and there is no index of evidence. but using my assessment there need only be 60 GH to hide. 6000/100=60 and therefore can be hidden quite well.

I'm not saying my answer is right. In fact i might be as far flung from the truth as any other user of scrypt.cc. But no one has attempted to "Prove" the hash rate, only to "Disprove." And so i have attempted. If there is only one point, then it falls flat. Everything has a counter, it simply must be found.

There have never been court cases held between 1 party to prove their points against their same points. It would be a funny spoof, perhaps, But for every offence there is a defense. But not all are quite as effective as the rest.

If 60 GH cannot factually be hidden between 3 coins then i'm at the point that i simply have no other alternatives, and will rest my case. However, the admin might not if he ever does decide to sue. That is why i'm trying, as nobody realized that criminals can win law suits too...

Edit: 60 GH can be generated by 600 A2 terminator units, and if the total hash rate available to users is 60 GH, the admin has 6 GH to himself, as that miner produces 110 MH.

Edit 2: After calculating the generation of 6 GH, it would produce in excess of $200 per day. In brazil (who knows...) that kind of cash is hard to come by.

Edit 3: as I think of things to check i do so, sorry. But 60 GH produces 769 ltc daily. Now he does say that he mines 3 coins so i'm only referencing 1, but ltc is harder to generate than most, so it is a good one to base any kind of findings on. Also, i'll admit i'm not knowledgeable on the 3 most profitable coins, sorry...

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 04:03:58 PM

Quote from: cesmak on September 02, 2015, 03:59:25 PM

Kenny one small question, how many hash scrypt power claims now scrypt.cc to have on the network ? Look at the network total hash rate for scrypt mining (not sha256 aka BTC) and tell me where is this hashing power ....

To be honest, it is incalculable as the site hasn't posted the possession of hash rate almost ever. I don't know what the suggested total "Hash power" is or where the hell the number came from, But at any given time some of it is in constant possession. The admin has been run off by barbarians with torches and pitchforks, as would any sane person. To get that info we'd need it from the horses mouth, and he's not talking...

Ok you ask facts, but if someone ask you facts you deny to search them....

And tell me how is possible that in one day the power passed from Khs to Mhs so 10 time the previous power, don't you think that deploy such a huge quantity of hashing power need more than one day......

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Brad Harrison on September 02, 2015, 04:03:21 PM

Look how sexy Kenny is

http://www.pof.com/member15571750.htm

Any luck on here bro?

LOL who the hell is that? That is not me, I'm not that "Pretty," I's a ugly motherf**ker...

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: cesmak on September 02, 2015, 03:59:25 PM

Kenny one small question, how many hash scrypt power claims now scrypt.cc to have on the network ? Look at the network total hash rate for scrypt mining (not sha256 aka BTC) and tell me where is this hashing power ....

To be honest, it is incalculable as the site hasn't posted the possession of hash rate almost ever. I don't know what the suggested total "Hash power" is or where the hell the number came from, But at any given time some of it is in constant possession. The admin has been run off by barbarians with torches and pitchforks, as would any sane person. To get that info we'd need it from the horses mouth, and he's not talking...

Brad Harrison

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Look how sexy Kenny is

http://www.pof.com/member15571750.htm

Any luck on here bro?

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Kenny one small question, how many hash scrypt power claims now scrypt.cc to have on the network ? Look at the network total hash rate for scrypt mining (not sha256 aka BTC) and tell me where is this hashing power ....

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: ThePhwner on September 02, 2015, 03:39:27 PM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 10:25:12 AM

to anyone here who still thinks scrypt.cc is a scam...

i have only found "Evidence" as perpetrated by a handful of individuals, some of which have had their entire post count generated here, on this thread dedicated to scrypt.cc's announcement/support, on an off-topic they injected and have ridden.

If scrypt.cc is a scam, then this is my last post, as i will be spamming the report button linking to this page. Moderators please review all the claims and make a judgement as to whether scrypt.cc is indeed dangerous. If it is, close this thread and place a warning telling users as such. If it is not close it anyway and inform the OP of this because it is way too far gone to be directed back.

Personally, i cannot verify the claims made, even as i am using the site. And as such, please use your moderative powers to do something about this nonsense. there are few forums so under regulated as this one...

Do us a favor and be honest and keep your word to the community. I really wish that had been your last post. But no, now you're defending Marcelo again.

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:36:01 PM

Where does it also say a MH is any thing at all. Not shilling. Trying to provide alternatives for the people here who quit their jobs over Scrypt.cc when they were making > $750 a day. If this wasn't you, prolly shouldn't join their side, emo train wrecks take you down with them.

If you can't accept it, and I'm unintelligent for finding the reward that exists, then i apologize for being stupid. But if you didn't notice, it's kinda a ghost town here. All your friends are at scrypt. Mabey you should pay Marcelo a visit and apologize. You guys are the reason he won't speak or bring the chat back.

Every investment in the USA took a hit the past week. If you invest in anything, then don't use it as your only income. And if Scrypt.cc is a scam, well that's just fine by me...

Post this in the next PSA you all do: Give Scrypt.cc your coins, the go to Kenny. I'm just saying, it works for me, and when it stops, I'll go elsewhere. But to inform you of why i say prove with numbers pulled by evidence not magic: You can't get Santos, but that only means you are a sitting duck. Scam or not, you are hurting his "business." He can and should sue for damages, defamation of name and lost business, but mabey i'm not that smart.

Look to your bold sentence. Until i see evidence that can keep you safe from Santos, then it is not a scam. If it was then why do they all go back? People aren't stupid. They leave when they have been cheated all on their own...

ThePhwner

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

something something Bitcoin

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 10:25:12 AM

to anyone here who still thinks scrypt.cc is a scam...

i have only found "Evidence" as perpetrated by a handful of individuals, some of which have had their entire post count generated here, on this thread dedicated to scrypt.cc's announcement/support, on an off-topic they injected and have ridden.

If scrypt.cc is a scam, then this is my last post, as i will be spamming the report button linking to this page. Moderators please review all the claims and make a judgement as to whether scrypt.cc is indeed dangerous. If it is, close this thread and place a warning telling users as such. If it is not close it anyway and inform the OP of this because it is way too far gone to be directed back.

Personally, i cannot verify the claims made, even as i am using the site. And as such, please use your moderative powers to do something about this nonsense. there are few forums so under regulated as this one...

Do us a favor and be honest and keep your word to the community. I really wish that had been your last post. But no, now you're defending Marcelo again.

And trying to defend people "who quit their jobs over ScryptCC." Not only is that a moronic group of people, I only know of two who did it: KitSteele and MrFunTime. And yeah both were in their heyday when Scamzi was selling for 1100-1200 per KHS and paying out really well. For those precious couple weeks.

You're not doing anything here but making a mess and putting more stupid ideas into the fabric of the cosmos.

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:36:01 PM

Where does it also say a MH is any thing at all. Not shilling. Trying to provide alternatives for the people here who quit their jobs over Scrypt.cc when they were making > $750 a day. If this wasn't you, prolly shouldn't join their side, emo train wrecks take you down with them.

If you can't accept it, and I'm unintelligent for finding the reward that exists, then i apologize for being stupid. But if you didn't notice, it's kinda a ghost town here. All your friends are at scrypt. Mabey you should pay Marcelo a visit and apologize. You guys are the reason he won't speak or bring the chat back.

Every investment in the USA took a hit the past week. If you invest in anything, then don't use it as your only income. And if Scrypt.cc is a scam, well that's just fine by me...

Post this in the next PSA you all do: Give Scrypt.cc your coins, the go to Kenny. I'm just saying, it works for me, and when it stops, I'll go elsewhere. But to inform you of why i say prove with numbers pulled by evidence not magic: You can't get Santos, but that only means you are a sitting duck. Scam or not, you are hurting his "business." He can and should sue for damages, defamation of name and lost business, but mabey i'm not that smart.

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: suchmoon on September 02, 2015, 03:23:52 PM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:11:42 PM

Since noone has any numbers for me to crunch, perhaps this will be simply refuted as well...

1 MH at script.cc = 1 share at script.cc
1 share at script.cc = 100 kh

Where does it say "share" on the scrypt.cc site? Where does it say that "MHS" is anything other than MHS?

It's as if you're not trying anymore Kenny. Must shill harder.

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:11:42 PM

I have a brain same as the next guy...

Highly unlikely.

Where does it also say a MH is any thing at all. Not shilling. Trying to provide alternatives for the people here who quit their jobs over Scrypt.cc when they were making > $750 a day. If this wasn't you, prolly shouldn't join their side, emo train wrecks take you down with them.

If you can't accept it, and I'm unintelligent for finding the reward that exists, then i apologize for being stupid. But if you didn't notice, it's kinda a ghost town here. All your friends are at scrypt. Mabey you should pay Marcelo a visit and apologize. You guys are the reason he won't speak or bring the chat back.

Every investment in the USA took a hit the past week. If you invest in anything, then don't use it as your only income. And if Scrypt.cc is a scam, well that's just fine by me...

Post this in the next PSA you all do: Give Scrypt.cc your coins, the go to Kenny. I'm just saying, it works for me, and when it stops, I'll go elsewhere. But to inform you of why i say prove with numbers pulled by evidence not magic: You can't get Santos, but that only means you are a sitting duck. Scam or not, you are hurting his "business." He can and should sue for damages, defamation of name and lost business, but mabey i'm not that smart.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:11:42 PM

Since noone has any numbers for me to crunch, perhaps this will be simply refuted as well...

1 MH at script.cc = 1 share at script.cc
1 share at script.cc = 100 kh

Where does it say "share" on the scrypt.cc site? Where does it say that "MHS" is anything other than MHS?

It's as if you're not trying anymore Kenny. Must shill harder.

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 03:11:42 PM

I have a brain same as the next guy...

Highly unlikely.

Kenny2421

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Since noone has any numbers for me to crunch, perhaps this will be simply refuted as well...

1 MH at script.cc = 1 share at script.cc
1 share at script.cc = 100 kh
100 kh of ltc alone, a.k.a. top profit scrypt coin, is 1552 satoshis per day...
100 kh split 3 ways over 3 coins ~ 1342 satoshis per day...

my referenc material: http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/litecoin-mining-calculator/?h=100&p=1500.00&pc=0.10&pf=0.00&d=39229.29577465&r=25.00000000&er=0.01211000&btcer=231.29000000&hc=0.00

Supposing scrypt.cc does not mine, then where are the numbers to prove it?

If i am not qualified to be in crypto because i have not been on this forum long, then naysayers need not speak when they have never mined...

If there is more solid evidence than this i have yet to see it.

<

Crestington

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1024

Quote from: ThePhwner on September 02, 2015, 11:44:22 AM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 02, 2015, 10:25:12 AM

to anyone here who still thinks scrypt.cc is a scam...

i have only found "Evidence" as perpetrated by a handful of individuals, some of which have had their entire post count generated here, on this thread dedicated to scrypt.cc's announcement/support, on an off-topic they injected and have ridden.

If scrypt.cc is a scam, then this is my last post, as i will be spamming the report button linking to this page. Moderators please review all the claims and make a judgement as to whether scrypt.cc is indeed dangerous. If it is, close this thread and place a warning telling users as such. If it is not close it anyway and inform the OP of this because it is way too far gone to be directed back.

Personally, i cannot verify the claims made, even as i am using the site. And as such, please use your moderative powers to do something about this nonsense. there are few forums so under regulated as this one...

Kenny, Kenny, Kenny... if you unzip that red hooded jacket a bit you might be able to see a little better.

First of all, mods aren't going to evaluate the legitimacy of Scamzi. They will delete off-topic posts, spam, etc. If you want proof, look at ckolivas' note on the BitAffNet thread. As a mod, he's made it clear that the mods' duty is not to censor based on their evaluation of a particular investment/project/etc. If you find anything off topic, like shitty poetry, report that and it will likely be removed.

That being said, since you missed this the first hundred times:

Here's a short summary of the facts:

1. Investor fraud began immediately when Marcelo advertised he was selling shares on a mining farm when no mining was taken place. This is investor fraud by US law and likely in other jurisdictions.

2. The 850 Gh/s claimed which is now closer to 600 Gh/s, cannot be accounted for on any Scrypt coin network and coin liquidity analysis on exchanges does not show volume sufficient to exchange enough Scrypt coins to support Bitcoin payouts on this site.

3. Rewards have steadily diminished now for months, despite significant improvements in Scrypt mining conditions. This resulted in a price drop and extended many people's ROI into neverland.

4. Many people had 37,000 KHS mysteriously removed from their accounts. This has not been explained or corrected.

5. Many people have had multiple support tickets deleted with no resolution.

6. Many people have had withdrawals cancelled and/or shown them as processed when they were never sent.

7. When KHS was converted to MHS, the overall availability went from 850 "GHS" to 600 "GHS" with no explanation as to the reduction
7a. During this conversion rounding was used and many people lost KHS
7b. Once the conversion took place, the commodity was immediately devalued below the 100 satoshi per KHS threshold once again devaluing portfolios.

8. At multiple points, many people have had auto-invest force turned on, resulting in additional loss of accrued BTC.

Funny that you're coming after people in regards to their account age and post counts, when this was something you didn't find relevant when I called you out for it.

No no, you have missed a zero. When there was the conversion the 850 GHS became 6000 GHS, not 600 GHS so scrypt.cc has 5 times the amount of all the litecoin network.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Since our buddy ThorSWO is not here to impress us with his mad blockchain skills I'm gonna have to do it.

Withdrawal address:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Bidh2XFr9JzfXppeZd2cPKpbnJGvqCY4h

Is showing no activity for > 36 hours so I guess the 24-hour withdrawal promise isn't quite working out.

There is some cash in the other address, presumably the deposit one:

https://blockchain.info/address/1HWqsgnSd12Gv8SpoUMi1Cj8hp79BTSpW7

But no recent activity either.

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 119. (Read 750579 times)