Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 122. (Read 750606 times)

I am not a lawyer, but i do see the need to look deeper than the surface ofthe evidence i have been given. And i am aware that if i mention this i will be attacked. However if he is guilty as other say he is, then why is he still around. It seems to me someone did get burned and they aren't happy about it. Not all that glitters happens to be gold. Here in Virginia we have excellent pyrite. worth very little but acts as an excellent conductor if used properly. And all I'm asking is that if the thread that detailed the evidence we have is still around i believe we should add more. There is never a such thing as enough proof. The Wrights didn't provide much evidence for flying machines, but a sales pitch to germany got the feds attention. And that is what im saying we need. If we have the evidence that he has produced fraudulent transaction and we have profe that he is not paying proceeds as he says he is, then we need the killer pitch. The end all no-hitter to win our case. If we don't care for it, then we don't care that a scam is being run in our neighborhood. If a con artist did his business on your street at home would you not call him out? And similarly, to do so you would need that killer piece. If it exits then 1. we have it in storage and aren't using it, or 2. We don't have it and need it. But I'm just a stupid shill what do i know? And so the cycle repeats.

@Kenny2421: Are you a lawyer of something like that.. seems hard to deal with you
Can i hire you  i pay you good mate.

I was trying to sound as socially acceptable as possible, though it is all simply because if i argue for your points, or if i defent a valid counter position i end up assaulted, so i choose to be what the hell ever is needed. If you mention bitmain again you really are a shill for bitmain, though that is not as accurate as an under payed advertiser. If santos cant have any hash power and he cant be proved to be scamming by anything more than what we have then there is little room for any one to really complain. his "scam" will continue until he either ditches, and not many people are going to complain for either side, or it will continue forever. There is no Ponzi with modified behavior in any other attempt, and im not sure but i did hear he's peen playing it for nearly a couple of years. i really only got burned when the hash reward went down, and it ticked me off. But if he is not guilty enough to condemn, but is enough so to complain can we find some way to organize what is and split them between to threads. If we cant, then i'm at a loss for all things. And as such there will never be room for more than the single suggestion here. We have lost touch with logic and reasoning puting them together as a loop instead of as a chain. "his site is a scam because he is a liar," seems unfair to me but if that is law in crypto then it is law.

I think he funds the Mexican cartel with profits

There you go, good boy. You should have started with this and saved everyone a multi-page waste of time.

There are a couple of factual error though, instead of "hacking assault" and "electricity bill" it should say "admin's fee for booze and hookers" or whatever you call it.

If it is not closed then return to the shadows of the Scrypt.cc is a ponzi thread. Even if it was not yours, someone quoted you as blaspheming lord santos. In a bid to win over our chumps, you were quoted as describing in detail how our Holy 850 GH in not real. Perhaps it is not you that i remember but you were very active. And so Lord Santos banishes you from our land...

edit to your edit:I also am fluent in monkey business: "Oh ah oh ah ah," not entirely sure what that means, the last chimp i spoke to clawed my face...

i have reported it, as i have had to question the validity of the statements made. I did so by reporting my own post actually. And since arguing for your cause got me no where then i will indeed become a shill.

"We at Scrypt.cc deny any and all reports of wrongdoing. If you invested in us, and your money is missing then it is not our fault. If you recall, we were victims of a hacking assault. They still have access to the wallets...So enjoy. We also have an enormous electricity bill to pay, so the rewards will remain low as usual. Thank you for your continued support for our piggie banks."

You should edit this to read FACTS THAT WE CAREFULLY CHOOSE TO FIT OUR CONVENIENT WORLD VIEW. They can shut down a website without knowing who the owner is. I thought this thread couldn't get any worse until OhMyGodTheyKilledKenny showed up. When do we get to the part where the rats eat you and just leave your coat?

Kenny, use the "Report to moderator" link to report posts that you deem off topic just like I'm starting to use it to report your posts. And thank you for making your opinion on scrypt.cc known to all of us, that's enough for now. When you have something new to say - feel free.

fuck scryptcc, and yourself, imo... the shit is a scam and every fucking bell should ring this 24/7

i never said anything was enough either you biased claims nor my screenshots. but if there is no case to prove then the thread is effectively off-topic and we should instead turn our attention to either supporting scrypt.cc on it support thread, or we should close it. Either way scrypt.cc = ponzi= off topic, and i'm done trying to prove one way or the other for it is niether. scrypt.cc = nothing. Can we see some moderation here...

Page 442 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

Yeah of course. 24 hours and some screenshots is all you need to prove to the "jury" whatever it is you're trying to prove. And if you refuse to read what's already been posted in this thread numerous times then anything you say is a fact. Is that how your legal system works?

Here is a screenshot with autoinvest turned on. I'm sure an experienced Internet detective like yourself can use that to put Marcello behind bars once and for all, right?


Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image

Don't bother trying to replicate a bug. The bug is probably the fact that auto invest is not enabling on your account. It's happened to me at least three times. The MHS change has worked to my benefit. I have such a small amount there it's not earning enough money for auto invest to actually kick in and do something.
Just because you've not experienced it doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

Mr. Kenneth Tipton, you waffle about evidence this and evidence that and all you have posted are screenshots of one user (yourself) and you haven't even read what's actually going on. Autoinvest turns on periodically, not all the time. Wait for the next wave of withdrawals or some other arbitrary admin action.

Reading is fun, try it. Less posting, more reading, can you do that?

If Phwnr had a brain and not a bwnr he'd see that...

http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-Before-8-31-15-4-34-pm_zpsenqqg6ml.jpg
http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-Before-9-1-12-33-pm_zpsfc8j7znk.jpg
http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-Before-9-1-8-46-am_zpsds9v2a4z.jpg

http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-settings-8-31-15-4-34-pm_zpslkkuazrp.jpg
http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-settings-9-1-15-8-46-am_zpssjqxj6wh.jpg
http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz11/Kenneth_Tipton/Scryptcc-settings-9-1-15-12-33-pm_zpssxz43oek.jpg

the one fact i do know is that there seems to be fearmongering going on, there is no auto invest fraud transactions at all...Not sure how anybody else got those...

But my deposits have all worked, i proved that already...

and its not like i can just all willy nilly go buy a Zeusminer X6 for 5 dollars. Those rewards are from 28kh, LOL, if ponzi = ponzi cuz you said so I vote the villages oldest crypto incrnation to be God of Crypto cuz he said it was so and that makes it a reality. I did not get lucky for this long start explaining how your facts cam make me magically suffer fraudulent transactions after this length of time of not having them.

If someone says they have a missing transaction but do not post that it has not gone through then 1. They recieved it and didn't report back, 2. They never had it in the first place, or 3. the like to sound cool picking sides with the bullies who have little mor "Facts" than the lies of the man that the claim to be from. If santos is a liar, then what makes your facts facts, when he has lied to your face many times.

I look at numbers and i see fact i look at words from a known liar and cheat and cry foul whenever he opens his mouth.

If santos lies then you have no evidence...

So, all I am seeing lately is shill this shill that.  Plain and simple fact is there are shills on both sides of the coin.  Now as for Shutting down the website and suing Marcelo.  Explain to me why than, there are so many HYIP that still function, no one get's taken to court for those, let alone anything else.  Or how about the scam artists with supposed hardware that have screwed people out of $2,000+.  Yea Nothing happens to those people either as far as I have seen.  The problem is CRYPTOCURRENCY, in general, Due to lack of Regulation, and this is according to CEX.IO, cannot be traced and recovered.  CEX.IO in that circumstance as far as I am concerned is just as crooked as the criminals out there doing the theft, but that's my opinion on them.

Either way, the HYIP function, or so people say, because they are over seas and aren't subject to US Laws concerning HYIP.

Now given the fact, Marcelo, unless he is in the US, is not subject to the same laws as the US, still subject to international laws, but those do differ, personally not sure by how much, but I know they do differ.  Now GAW was based in the US so they were subject to US Law.  Hence the reason they were so easily taken down, that and the power company issue.

Either way, unless HARD FACTS are presented, no judge is going to bother looking at SCC. Let alone any federal Agency.  You can toss around numbers that may or may not exist, but until Undeniable Facts are presented all the posts about this and that blah blah are more or less falling on deaf ears.  By Undeniable Evidence, I mean someone who knows for a FACT, because they met the man, that there is no mining going on and has photo's to prove it.  We know beyond a doubt that Marcelo (Or whatever the Real Name is) lives in the US or Brazil or wherever he/she/it might be.  Until we can get to something along those lines, all the bitching and whining in the world isn't going to help.

Don't get me wrong, not a fan of the whole Regulation thing with Cryptocurrency, but it would save people a Ton of headaches when dealing with Ponzi's/HYIP/SCAMS in general.

Denial or acceptance, can you or can't you?