Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 121. (Read 750606 times)

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
September 02, 2015, 04:49:44 AM
I know many people keep talking about the mythical 850 GHS but I seem to remember about 20-30 pages back when KHS became MHS that the "mining power" became about 6000 GHS. Kenny keeps talking about absence of proof and not wanting to look through the 400 pages in order to find it, quotes of the people not receiving their withdrawls and auto-invest being re-enabled and the MHS change could probably be added to the scam accusation thread.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
September 02, 2015, 02:37:53 AM
I not lose my money but my time  Angry

and dont waste your time at here
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
September 02, 2015, 02:11:28 AM
This Kenny2421 guy is some next level shill. It's astounding. Reading that text is like interpreting the output of a random text generator. I'm half expecting to see "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua......" in the near future.

I'm surprised that CloudFlare haven't suspended use of their service to this website. They've had quite a few complaints about it, seems disingenuous to just refer people to the hosts of the site.

That PSA is very much needed on every page. It's almost worth adding to your signature.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 02, 2015, 01:45:37 AM
Page 443 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

your psa is annoying it need not be everywhere. It is in the wrong thread. This is for scrypt.cc support/announcement. It was opened by Scrypt.cc's admin. If you have a complaint file it with them. Repeatedly. Might take a while. Tickets get deleted by the administration, likely for false reporting of claims/offensiveness. YOU have been warned...

The PSA should be everywhere and this is the perfect thread. Kudos to Suchmoon for staying on target and only being minimally derailed by your absurd, incomprehensible rantings. You're now back to defending the support ticket process at ScamCC and defending MarceloScamtosThorSwallow because he started this thread and should control what's posted here? And you're issuing warnings?

By your logic someone looking for information on ScamCC should come to this thread for the offical Marshmellow version and then find another thread for comments that disagree? Clearly your travels through RuneScape and Pokemon have taught you a little bit about how Internet forums work, or one would think.

You've become a joke. An actual joke. Because no one knows what the hell you're saying and you change positions more than a flock of geese. You're not a tech savvy coder. You're not a smart investor. You don't understand the legal system in the US or any other country, and that the evidence already gathered is sufficient and reports are already being made. You also don't understand how to take a position on an issue based on facts, and how to hold your ground, and that selectively picking things others have said and trying to apply a bastardized form of logic's transitive properties, is nothing but the work of an ill-informed child.

Unfortunately all I've been able to conclude from our conversations today, is that it's not worth trying to understand you. At least we know what to expect from Thor.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
September 02, 2015, 01:32:47 AM


this is why i never apologize simply because i never mean it. You reference medication...if you only knew what they keep me on... I don't think you understand that to report abuse you actuall have to have a claim to file. If there were enough people with valid claims able to do so, wouldn't they be posting their evidence here so people who don't need their skittles could do it for them? If there were as many legitimate problems as are quoted to be as are here in this thread alone, then there would be no Scrypt.cc. People don't need a forum Master to tell them to close a scammers door. They would already be doing so. Lets be fair. "absence of no mining = Evidence of no mining," or in this case "Continued Scrypt.cc = Evidence no body gives a shit..." So if there is no other possibility and there are so many potential problems to be had at scrypt, lets all either contact the web host, or move along...We don't need this continued anymore. If you got burned, sucks to be you. You should really not blame the investment medium. Remember "If you wanted fair, you should not have gotten into crypto."
If you have so much support with you quoted evidence, and Santos yet continues then are you not simply bitching at a wall. There are not enough people to take down the server because theres only you couple losers who wont post anything extra. Mabey you don't know but evidence keeps getting collected even throughout a trial. So that in the event that the can't prove it, they have more. I almost walked my friend. And santos just did because i just don't care about how you mighta/sorta/didn't lose money. If there were enough of you i wouldn't have a stance. I'd be right there with you. But if you can't convince one person beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have all that you need, even to a guy who got burned twice, then goold luck on the whole beina a blustering gust of FAIL...

Only the truly stupid and/or incredibly greedy would need convincing that this is an utter scam when presented with the facts. Thanks for confirming you're medicated to the point of non-comprehension.

I am both stupid and greedy, and on medication for a very peculiar condition. It is called Possession and i am the devil. For i have been the luckiest bitch of santos
Hahahaha LMFAO!😂 Funniest quote ever on this thread referring to that last sentence and it sure made my day better 😄😄😄
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
September 02, 2015, 12:49:54 AM
Kenny, you are an idiot who believes himself to be smart.

Your statements prove you know nothing of law, save that you have 'learned' through watching TV shows. It matters not what you believe is needed to prove scrypt.cc is a criminal fraud, it has already been proven as such by way of the fact they explicitly marketed their operation as being a Scrypt mining service and are provably lying. Click on the link in my sig and try disputing those facts.

The fact they have misled their 'investors', irrespective of claims towards smallprint buried in their ToS, means they have broken US securities law if they so much as have one US resident as an 'investor'. It does not matter where they operate from, virtual or physical.

Individuals and companies all over the world have found themselves discovering that fact after contravening US law from another jurisdiction while serving US customers online.

So, no, nobody needs to be 'getting together' and trying to prove they have been defrauded by scrypt.cc when all it takes is to report scrypt.cc to various three-letter agencies for being a ponzi-based scheme which has sold 500+GH/s of Scrypt mining power it does not posses.

This reporting is already being done. So unless you actually have something useful to contribute to this thread, spare us the poorly-spelled word-salad posts you so love and kindly fuck off.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
September 02, 2015, 12:49:11 AM
I not lose my money but my time  Angry
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
September 01, 2015, 07:51:15 PM
Page 443 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

your psa is annoying it need not be everywhere.

That's a contradiction. If it's annoying to scrypt.cc shills like yourself then it needs to be here. You're welcome.

Edit: Congrats on your red badge. I have a feeling we're going to have a new actor playing this role soon.

Good work suchmoon with the pressure!
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
September 01, 2015, 07:21:31 PM
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
September 01, 2015, 07:11:16 PM
Page 443 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

your psa is annoying it need not be everywhere.

That's a contradiction. If it's annoying to scrypt.cc shills like yourself then it needs to be here. You're welcome.

Edit: Congrats on your red badge. I have a feeling we're going to have a new actor playing this role soon.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
September 01, 2015, 07:03:06 PM
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 01, 2015, 06:56:06 PM
Page 443 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

your psa is annoying it need not be everywhere. It is in the wrong thread. This is for scrypt.cc support/announcement. It was opened by Scrypt.cc's admin. If you have a complaint file it with them. Repeatedly. Might take a while. Tickets get deleted by the administration, likely for false reporting of claims/offensiveness. YOU have been warned...
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
September 01, 2015, 06:51:41 PM
Page 443 PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 01, 2015, 06:28:09 PM


this is why i never apologize simply because i never mean it. You reference medication...if you only knew what they keep me on... I don't think you understand that to report abuse you actuall have to have a claim to file. If there were enough people with valid claims able to do so, wouldn't they be posting their evidence here so people who don't need their skittles could do it for them? If there were as many legitimate problems as are quoted to be as are here in this thread alone, then there would be no Scrypt.cc. People don't need a forum Master to tell them to close a scammers door. They would already be doing so. Lets be fair. "absence of no mining = Evidence of no mining," or in this case "Continued Scrypt.cc = Evidence no body gives a shit..." So if there is no other possibility and there are so many potential problems to be had at scrypt, lets all either contact the web host, or move along...We don't need this continued anymore. If you got burned, sucks to be you. You should really not blame the investment medium. Remember "If you wanted fair, you should not have gotten into crypto."
If you have so much support with you quoted evidence, and Santos yet continues then are you not simply bitching at a wall. There are not enough people to take down the server because theres only you couple losers who wont post anything extra. Mabey you don't know but evidence keeps getting collected even throughout a trial. So that in the event that the can't prove it, they have more. I almost walked my friend. And santos just did because i just don't care about how you mighta/sorta/didn't lose money. If there were enough of you i wouldn't have a stance. I'd be right there with you. But if you can't convince one person beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have all that you need, even to a guy who got burned twice, then goold luck on the whole beina a blustering gust of FAIL...

Only the truly stupid and/or incredibly greedy would need convincing that this is an utter scam when presented with the facts. Thanks for confirming you're medicated to the point of non-comprehension.

I am both stupid and greedy, and on medication for a very peculiar condition. It is called Possession and i am the devil. For i have been the luckiest bitch of santos. And to that end if you can't count, Even 1000 of isn't enough... I am convinced there are problems but if you could kindly point me to the original thread designated for your complaints that contained all of your "evidence" compacted into the first several posts, i would gladly reeducate myself. Unless there have been any new additions to your evidence list, 850 GH and a data center that moves in 48 hours seems like a bunch of crap from santos. i never disputed that. But i do say that it has not been gone over more intricately than in that thread. If i can point out where his 850 K/M/G hash might be hiding i will do so in my best attempt. But if that thread has been closed then it is no small wonder. Your mindless belief in something to the point that any other suggestion is a sin is irritating to no end. This thread is so off topic and it became as such when the few of you who hold your belief took to it in protest that derailed it and hijacked it like a boss. If I am not permitted to debunk anything attempting to one side or another then so be it. But *WHO* read 440+ pages and still has their head on their shoulders. It was you or the other goon of yours that began the thread to compile your list of evidence. If it no longer exists then neither does your evidence, as not enough people cared.

Edit it was listed in someone's sig if i recall...

also it has just been us arguing since this morning no one has reported new problems. Must mean at least something changed. Scamtos, or the proprietor of the holy Hashbox, I'm not saying he's good, but neither am i saying you're right the more problems there are the more your support the less problems the fewer people backing the Ponzi claim. That is a fact and it spells "fishie,"

I will never trust buying a miner online used again after i got my last one, but i am not going to buy anything as a serious investment in crypto ever. I only mine my coins. Everything else is a game. I just don't see either side finding a serious divider. If there is only support for you during problems then something is wrong, but not necessarily illegal.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 01, 2015, 06:17:03 PM


this is why i never apologize simply because i never mean it. You reference medication...if you only knew what they keep me on... I don't think you understand that to report abuse you actuall have to have a claim to file. If there were enough people with valid claims able to do so, wouldn't they be posting their evidence here so people who don't need their skittles could do it for them? If there were as many legitimate problems as are quoted to be as are here in this thread alone, then there would be no Scrypt.cc. People don't need a forum Master to tell them to close a scammers door. They would already be doing so. Lets be fair. "absence of no mining = Evidence of no mining," or in this case "Continued Scrypt.cc = Evidence no body gives a shit..." So if there is no other possibility and there are so many potential problems to be had at scrypt, lets all either contact the web host, or move along...We don't need this continued anymore. If you got burned, sucks to be you. You should really not blame the investment medium. Remember "If you wanted fair, you should not have gotten into crypto."
If you have so much support with you quoted evidence, and Santos yet continues then are you not simply bitching at a wall. There are not enough people to take down the server because theres only you couple losers who wont post anything extra. Mabey you don't know but evidence keeps getting collected even throughout a trial. So that in the event that the can't prove it, they have more. I almost walked my friend. And santos just did because i just don't care about how you mighta/sorta/didn't lose money. If there were enough of you i wouldn't have a stance. I'd be right there with you. But if you can't convince one person beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have all that you need, even to a guy who got burned twice, then goold luck on the whole beina a blustering gust of FAIL...

Only the truly stupid and/or incredibly greedy would need convincing that this is an utter scam when presented with the facts. Thanks for confirming you're medicated to the point of non-comprehension.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 01, 2015, 06:10:43 PM
@Kenny2421: Are you a lawyer of something like that.. seems hard to deal with you
Can i hire you  i pay you good mate.

I am not a lawyer, but i do see the need to look deeper than the surface ofthe evidence i have been given. And i am aware that if i mention this i will be attacked. However if he is guilty as other say he is, then why is he still around. It seems to me someone did get burned and they aren't happy about it. Not all that glitters happens to be gold. Here in Virginia we have excellent pyrite. worth very little but acts as an excellent conductor if used properly. And all I'm asking is that if the thread that detailed the evidence we have is still around i believe we should add more. There is never a such thing as enough proof. The Wrights didn't provide much evidence for flying machines, but a sales pitch to germany got the feds attention. And that is what im saying we need. If we have the evidence that he has produced fraudulent transaction and we have profe that he is not paying proceeds as he says he is, then we need the killer pitch. The end all no-hitter to win our case. If we don't care for it, then we don't care that a scam is being run in our neighborhood. If a con artist did his business on your street at home would you not call him out? And similarly, to do so you would need that killer piece. If it exits then 1. we have it in storage and aren't using it, or 2. We don't have it and need it. But I'm just a stupid shill what do i know? And so the cycle repeats.

You need medication. In the same day you've sent me a enormously long PM apologizing and offering to collaborate, then begun to attack me. Seriously... what's  your angle on this man? The bolded text is the most honest and accurate thing you've said all day. This quest you're on for evidence is laughable. The evidence of fraud is so very basic - he's sold mining shares and he's not mining. And as deposits have dwindled so have rewards and subsequent withdrawals. Classic Ponzi.

And you've unfortunately taken the path of all your other PQ brethren - attacking me instead of facing facts. Thing is, I don't care if you attack me and I can be more persistent than you I guarantee. Regardless of what you say about me, and you've certainly made up quite a few things that you can't back up when I ask you to, it doesn't change the fact that this is a provable scam.

Let's see if your next posts continues to defend it, attacks me, attacks the scam, or a weird combination of all three with another poem and shitty geology lesson.

Once again, you jumped into this party quite late and are ignoring the facts in evidence so far. The fact that your addled brain doesn't like the facts, unfortunately doesn't make them any less true. And as I have said several times in this thread, if enough people contact the PhoenixNAP abuse dept., they can at least shut off the box he has there, regardless of whether they know who he is or not.



this is why i never apologize simply because i never mean it. You reference medication...if you only knew what they keep me on... I don't think you understand that to report abuse you actuall have to have a claim to file. If there were enough people with valid claims able to do so, wouldn't they be posting their evidence here so people who don't need their skittles could do it for them? If there were as many legitimate problems as are quoted to be as are here in this thread alone, then there would be no Scrypt.cc. People don't need a forum Master to tell them to close a scammers door. They would already be doing so. Lets be fair. "absence of no mining = Evidence of no mining," or in this case "Continued Scrypt.cc = Evidence no body gives a shit..." So if there is no other possibility and there are so many potential problems to be had at scrypt, lets all either contact the web host, or move along...We don't need this continued anymore. If you got burned, sucks to be you. You should really not blame the investment medium. Remember "If you wanted fair, you should not have gotten into crypto."
If you have so much support with you quoted evidence, and Santos yet continues then are you not simply bitching at a wall. There are not enough people to take down the server because theres only you couple losers who wont post anything extra. Mabey you don't know but evidence keeps getting collected even throughout a trial. So that in the event that the can't prove it, they have more. I almost walked my friend. And santos just did because i just don't care about how you mighta/sorta/didn't lose money. If there were enough of you i wouldn't have a stance. I'd be right there with you. But if you can't convince one person beyond the shadow of a doubt that you have all that you need, even to a guy who got burned twice, then goold luck on the whole beina a blustering gust of FAIL...
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
September 01, 2015, 06:02:09 PM
Admin needs to open chatbox
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 01, 2015, 05:54:30 PM
@Kenny2421: Are you a lawyer of something like that.. seems hard to deal with you
Can i hire you  i pay you good mate.

I am not a lawyer, but i do see the need to look deeper than the surface ofthe evidence i have been given. And i am aware that if i mention this i will be attacked. However if he is guilty as other say he is, then why is he still around. It seems to me someone did get burned and they aren't happy about it. Not all that glitters happens to be gold. Here in Virginia we have excellent pyrite. worth very little but acts as an excellent conductor if used properly. And all I'm asking is that if the thread that detailed the evidence we have is still around i believe we should add more. There is never a such thing as enough proof. The Wrights didn't provide much evidence for flying machines, but a sales pitch to germany got the feds attention. And that is what im saying we need. If we have the evidence that he has produced fraudulent transaction and we have profe that he is not paying proceeds as he says he is, then we need the killer pitch. The end all no-hitter to win our case. If we don't care for it, then we don't care that a scam is being run in our neighborhood. If a con artist did his business on your street at home would you not call him out? And similarly, to do so you would need that killer piece. If it exits then 1. we have it in storage and aren't using it, or 2. We don't have it and need it. But I'm just a stupid shill what do i know? And so the cycle repeats.

You need medication. In the same day you've sent me a enormously long PM apologizing and offering to collaborate, then begun to attack me. Seriously... what's  your angle on this man? The bolded text is the most honest and accurate thing you've said all day. This quest you're on for evidence is laughable. The evidence of fraud is so very basic - he's sold mining shares and he's not mining. And as deposits have dwindled so have rewards and subsequent withdrawals. Classic Ponzi.

And you've unfortunately taken the path of all your other PQ brethren - attacking me instead of facing facts. Thing is, I don't care if you attack me and I can be more persistent than you I guarantee. Regardless of what you say about me, and you've certainly made up quite a few things that you can't back up when I ask you to, it doesn't change the fact that this is a provable scam.

Let's see if your next posts continues to defend it, attacks me, attacks the scam, or a weird combination of all three with another poem and shitty geology lesson.

Once again, you jumped into this party quite late and are ignoring the facts in evidence so far. The fact that your addled brain doesn't like the facts, unfortunately doesn't make them any less true. And as I have said several times in this thread, if enough people contact the PhoenixNAP abuse dept., they can at least shut off the box he has there, regardless of whether they know who he is or not.

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 01, 2015, 05:49:32 PM
Kenny chill chilll.. relax mate im just fooling around and by the way i never agreed with most people here about ponzi scam or whatever they called
but als don't like the actions lately what happend to rewards decrease etc..

I agree that i prolly should chill. Dealing with everyone here when i agree or disagree is just pointlessly tiring. No mater which stance i take it is wrong. And so i have chosen to do whatever i feel. Since they seem to be reporting me for being off topic but not on topic themselves, i have chosen to simply be on both sides. I have not had any of the issues other users have described, but that doesn't mean the won't crop up. But the claims are simply to wild to nail down as even man made. And yes the reward decrease was the last straw for me. But i'm currently just playing around with my last $5 in bts because it cost me $40 to mine it, lol. if i choose to blow it on a scam that i have been informed of then it is my choice. but if i can't prove the scam to my own eyes using the same principals, then I'm either a fool or the devil, cuz no one has that luck.
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
September 01, 2015, 05:42:48 PM
@Kenny2421: Are you a lawyer of something like that.. seems hard to deal with you
Can i hire you  i pay you good mate.

I am not a lawyer, but i do see the need to look deeper than the surface ofthe evidence i have been given. And i am aware that if i mention this i will be attacked. However if he is guilty as other say he is, then why is he still around. It seems to me someone did get burned and they aren't happy about it. Not all that glitters happens to be gold. Here in Virginia we have excellent pyrite. worth very little but acts as an excellent conductor if used properly. And all I'm asking is that if the thread that detailed the evidence we have is still around i believe we should add more. There is never a such thing as enough proof. The Wrights didn't provide much evidence for flying machines, but a sales pitch to germany got the feds attention. And that is what im saying we need. If we have the evidence that he has produced fraudulent transaction and we have profe that he is not paying proceeds as he says he is, then we need the killer pitch. The end all no-hitter to win our case. If we don't care for it, then we don't care that a scam is being run in our neighborhood. If a con artist did his business on your street at home would you not call him out? And similarly, to do so you would need that killer piece. If it exits then 1. we have it in storage and aren't using it, or 2. We don't have it and need it. But I'm just a stupid shill what do i know? And so the cycle repeats.

Kenny chill chilll.. relax mate im just fooling around and by the way i never agreed with most people here about ponzi scam or whatever they called
but also don't like the actions lately what happend to rewards decrease etc..
Jump to: