Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 368. (Read 750572 times)

newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
June 24, 2015, 03:46:50 AM
I think the admin to compensate for such losses.

31 GHS Daily Reward = 4 BTC
SCC Total 1100 GHS Daily Reward = 142 BTC

Admin full capacity(GHS) though he worked for 1 week,
just about 1000 BTC It will win.

so to meet the losses..

What do you think?

he told it yesterday night himself:

Yes, We are mining right now, of course. Current rewards are compensating the loss.

Have they stopped mining at least for some time during this incident? Because if so - there has to be a significant drop in scrypt hashrate and then rise up agan. If not - they have no real miners or uses an extended fractional reserve mining, that is selling way more hashpower than they own..

no, they just stopped some services on the websites. website was set in panic-mode. (disabled trade-engine, withdraw- and deposit-service).
miners are not affected by this incident and still mining.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
June 24, 2015, 03:34:15 AM
I think the admin to compensate for such losses.

31 GHS Daily Reward = 4 BTC
SCC Total 1100 GHS Daily Reward = 142 BTC

Admin full capacity(GHS) though he worked for 1 week,
just about 1000 BTC It will win.

so to meet the losses..

What do you think?

he told it yesterday night himself:

Yes, We are mining right now, of course. Current rewards are compensating the loss.

Have they stopped mining at least for some time during this incident? Because if so - there has to be a significant drop in scrypt hashrate and then rise up agan. If not - they have no real miners or uses an extended fractional reserve mining, that is selling way more hashpower than they own..
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
June 24, 2015, 03:27:26 AM
If they are really mining, and they are mining at that rate, then yes, they can recover. But in my experience, websites like this who say they got hacked are ponzis and will entirely disappear soon. But hope for the best.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
June 24, 2015, 03:22:01 AM
I think the admin to compensate for such losses.

31 GHS Daily Reward = 4 BTC
SCC Total 1100 GHS Daily Reward = 142 BTC

Admin full capacity(GHS) though he worked for 1 week,
just about 1000 BTC It will win.

so to meet the losses..

What do you think?

he told it yesterday night himself:

Yes, We are mining right now, of course. Current rewards are compensating the loss.
full member
Activity: 589
Merit: 100
June 24, 2015, 03:18:58 AM
I think the admin to compensate for such losses.

31 GHS Daily Reward = 4 BTC
SCC Total 1100 GHS Daily Reward = 142 BTC

Admin full capacity(GHS) though he worked for 1 week,
just about 1000 BTC It will win.

so to meet the losses..

What do you think?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
June 24, 2015, 02:40:32 AM


Cloud mining services can *only* make financial sense to operate if you are an ASIC manufacturer.



Hashnest shill ?

I kind of doubt Hashnest needs shilling lol Smiley
It's those pesky *secret* (not providing any proof of anything) cloudmining companies operated by ponzi scammers that needs shilling because otherwise they won't find any newbies to *invest* in them...
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1006
June 24, 2015, 02:22:44 AM
Besides, there's other ASIC-manufacturer cloud mining services so why assume I'm shilling for Hashnest? More importantly, how the fuck would I profit from sending people to a cloud mining service without a referral 'bonus' link?
LOL
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 24, 2015, 12:15:06 AM


Cloud mining services can *only* make financial sense to operate if you are an ASIC manufacturer.



Hashnest shill ?

That's a bit of a reach considering I'm stating that fact as a way to further explain how no cloud mining operation could possibly be financially viable in the way that scrypt.cc claims to be.

Besides, there's other ASIC-manufacturer cloud mining services so why assume I'm shilling for Hashnest? More importantly, how the fuck would I profit from sending people to a cloud mining service without a referral 'bonus' link?

Despite his insanity CryptoDevil has a valid point.

Despite my what? Citation please.

newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
June 23, 2015, 11:58:52 PM
Any news or only comics? Are somebody still logged in?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
June 23, 2015, 10:04:35 PM


Cloud mining services can *only* make financial sense to operate if you are an ASIC manufacturer.



Hashnest shill ?

Despite his insanity CryptoDevil has a valid point. Mining isn't a cheap business to get into and the margins aren't that great for most people. If you have a pile of unsold ASICs laying around, running a cloud service is a viable option. Buying ASICs from someone else, running them in a DC, paying the opex for that, selling cloud shares, and paying a 5% earnings bonus on top of all of it... seems like a financial black hole if mining is the revenue source.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
June 23, 2015, 09:48:28 PM
According to the Chat:

Admin:
I'm sorry I didn't post these earlier, Here's some more addies with stolen coins:

Admin:
1Q8pDY5FWjPRJrmjTphFXszt1PJXSF65Ek

Admin:
1FpMGYAGhQn5o67Gkrnm67G3a6vyiLfwG6

Admin:
1P6FxDft6ArYr1uRE7gWxofMuAZe86DyGJ

Admin:
15aN6Jt3qB7FwZ9WD4vsx2S7HKPYidADfX

Admin:
16rPv8mksTNuKQLFPLehLdUU7TqvukpqRg

Admin:
17YFbhr33F4Wgosx276MtYniAzNKuWCWC9

Admin:
194qvWN7HJjoERDi6JH6ytUznxuBJf2DJY

Admin:
1JHcXuvL9bnaWJnsLp3NWttrfBRgXV19mt




Hell i gotta breath in deaply... Over a 1.000 BTC claimed over thoose Addreses  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
June 23, 2015, 09:41:20 PM

Hey bro, I also live in Brazil and I think you had a very bright initiative deciding to go to the alleged address and check things out for yourself (instead of just debating rumors here). On the other hand, notice that this is supposed to be a BIG Altcoin mining operation, owning many miners that cost a bunch of money, so it is only rational that they wouldn't publish their real address (because of thefts) - other big american cloud mining services DO show pics of their mining pools, but conceal their addresses.

I agree that this may very likely be a scam, and I really appreciate you took the investigation matters into your own hands, but their address being fake is the smallest concern I could have right now.

Not a concern for you? Before I pulled all my coin out of Scrypt.cc, I witnessed Admin in the trollbox pointing to the public info in his WhoIs profile and saying that anyone in Brazil was welcome to visit the main offices at that address. If I still had any holdings here, I'd be concerned that it all seems to be oh so very fake.

Can anyone else confirm or deny those pics are ACTUALLY of the location published in Scrypt.CC's WHOIS?

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Alameda+Dr.+Carlos+de+Carvalho,+416+-+Centro,+Matriz,+Curitiba+-+PR,+Brazil/@-25.4326964,-49.2791075,51m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x94dce40b57786f71:0x3783ed852bd6ee6c

Curitiba trade Center?
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
June 23, 2015, 09:29:20 PM
My reaction while I wait for scrypt.cc to come back.



LMFAO
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
June 23, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
My reaction while I wait for scrypt.cc to come back.

member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
June 23, 2015, 08:34:42 PM


Cloud mining services can *only* make financial sense to operate if you are an ASIC manufacturer.



Hashnest shill ?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
June 23, 2015, 07:42:14 PM
good luck with your miners then, although, if cryptodevil want, he can PROVE that your miners are scam also.

You win the "Lamest Comeback" Award!  Congratulations!

He's still thinking about rockets cause he wants his Hashlets back.
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
June 23, 2015, 04:24:10 PM

Hey bro, I also live in Brazil and I think you had a very bright initiative deciding to go to the alleged address and check things out for yourself (instead of just debating rumors here). On the other hand, notice that this is supposed to be a BIG Altcoin mining operation, owning many miners that cost a bunch of money, so it is only rational that they wouldn't publish their real address (because of thefts) - other big american cloud mining services DO show pics of their mining pools, but conceal their addresses.

I agree that this may very likely be a scam, and I really appreciate you took the investigation matters into your own hands, but their address being fake is the smallest concern I could have right now.

Not a concern for you? Before I pulled all my coin out of Scrypt.cc, I witnessed Admin in the trollbox pointing to the public info in his WhoIs profile and saying that anyone in Brazil was welcome to visit the main offices at that address. If I still had any holdings here, I'd be concerned that it all seems to be oh so very fake.

Can anyone else confirm or deny those pics are ACTUALLY of the location published in Scrypt.CC's WHOIS?

I looked the address up on streetview and it's definitely the same place as those pix
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
June 23, 2015, 03:45:25 PM
good luck with your miners then, although, if cryptodevil want, he can PROVE that your miners are scam also.

You win the "Lamest Comeback" Award!  Congratulations!
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 23, 2015, 03:18:45 PM
read the first post, I answer to : "anyone who mine in this site, youll never get any ROI if you just Mining,"  - so this IS BULLSHIT, just like you repeat same things again.

So, let me get this right, myself and other people have presented clear and concise explanations of how you can check the actual facts yourself which prove scrypt.cc cannot be operating how they claim to be and you are under the impression that simply typing "IS BULLSHIT" in upper-case letters qualifies as a reasoned rebuttal?

LOL.

Seriously. LOL.



I really dont know now.. somebody with not much experience with the site wrote, that you will never ROI here because there is some problem every month. He feel very smart, just like you, after you finish every post here.  But this is bullshit, because me and lot of other people ROi-ed few times, and site was very stable from februaby to may. Hope its clear now, why you and your retarded friend have to write your shits about proofs, obvious scam bla bla all the time? I dont write about the "scam" thing now. Put a rocket to your ass and press start please, you can take Thepwner with you.

Yes, funny. However I'm not losing out on "mining" right now, because I own miners and didn't leave all my BTC in this site, making fun of and insulting those who question it. Have fun sitting around for a week waiting and hoping Marcelo sorts this out. Me and my assrocket will watch from afar.


good luck with your miners then, although, if cryptodevil want, he can PROVE that your miners are scam also.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
June 23, 2015, 03:16:49 PM

Hey bro, I also live in Brazil and I think you had a very bright initiative deciding to go to the alleged address and check things out for yourself (instead of just debating rumors here). On the other hand, notice that this is supposed to be a BIG Altcoin mining operation, owning many miners that cost a bunch of money, so it is only rational that they wouldn't publish their real address (because of thefts) - other big american cloud mining services DO show pics of their mining pools, but conceal their addresses.

I agree that this may very likely be a scam, and I really appreciate you took the investigation matters into your own hands, but their address being fake is the smallest concern I could have right now.

Not a concern for you? Before I pulled all my coin out of Scrypt.cc, I witnessed Admin in the trollbox pointing to the public info in his WhoIs profile and saying that anyone in Brazil was welcome to visit the main offices at that address. If I still had any holdings here, I'd be concerned that it all seems to be oh so very fake.

Can anyone else confirm or deny those pics are ACTUALLY of the location published in Scrypt.CC's WHOIS?

I was just stating that the address is not what makes this a hell of a big scam, since the only thing it would be normal for the Admin to conceal is the address itself. SCC's WHOIS also states that the phone is 9999-9999 - it may exist but sounds pretty made up! If he stated that is his address and anyone was welcome to check the whole thing out, sure it should be there, BUT the address is my smallest concern, his smallest lie among the light bill lie, the "hacking" of the website, the whole mining operation itself.

And I'm brazilian, live in Curitiba's State, know the city, it is from that address. You can check Google Street View and then compare with the pictures joaozarate posted.
Jump to: