Pages:
Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 101. (Read 750579 times)

legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1009
September 07, 2015, 10:13:38 AM
Page 80 of this thread.... dyask.....
legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1009
September 07, 2015, 10:11:19 AM
This is up on their site:

Quote
Hello Users,

Today (11/05/2015) the electricity of our data center hosting our ASICs was shutoff halting our mining operations temporarily. According to our provider, there are irregularities in our contracts that were found during an audit.

We have our lawyers on the case looking to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

While the lawyers do their thing, our hands are tied leaving us not much to do but wait. The provider isn't breaking any laws yet, law says they have 72 hours to reestablish the energy.

We will keep you updated.

Opinions?

11 MAY 2015 The power outage you are not well informed.... dyask


FACTS dyask FACTS !!!!
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 10:09:44 AM

NO NO NO!!!

Scrypt.cc sold 500 GHs of mining.  (NO DOUBT HERE)  However I believe that 500 GHs of CLAIMED mining is really 100 GHs of mining.    The 160 GHs is because of the claims that there was an additional 350 GHs not sold to users.  

The 100 GHs would be consistent with the awards seen over the last couple of months.    

So you admit only 100Gh/s of power mining, but if i remeber well, unfortunately i have no screenshot, before they disappear the hall of fame on the site about the top owners in mining power, owned very much more than 100Gh/s, so as you want to defend, there is always some liars in admins words.....

No I think that is the actual mining being done is around 160 GHs.   Users own 500 GHs of scrypt.cc mining.   However I think it takes 5 GHs of scrypt.cc mining make 1 GHs of real scrypt mining.   I think this is a pretty common problem with a lot of cloud mining sites to various degrees.  

Scrypt.cc Admin has clearly stated many times that he will no longer provide any proof of mining.   So there is only indirect evidence.  

EDIT: This is fun but I have to sleep.   Back tomorrow ...
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 10:05:45 AM
@dyask, can you please give me the point (for example in this chart) https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-ltc.html where on 11-13 May 2015 when there was the power outrage, the fallen in the hashrate of 500Gh/s + 350Gh/s (private owner script.cc) that affected the farm ?

THERE IS NO 3 days of 850 Gh/s missing hashare on the carts only normal fluctuation.....

Where is the mining ? Also with the oroginal number that also you say that are true... 500+350 Gh/s

Please find that hashare down ... please....

I NEVER SAID 850 GHs mining existed, that is the claim from the site.   My claim is < 200 GHs.  (~160)    I'm at GMT+9, and the power loss occurred on 5/14.   There is a clear temporary drop consistent with 200 GHs being shut off.   Scrypt.cc doesn't just min LTC, so it is fuzzy to judge.  
legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1009
September 07, 2015, 10:05:09 AM

NO NO NO!!!

Scrypt.cc sold 500 GHs of mining.  (NO DOUBT HERE)  However I believe that 500 GHs of CLAIMED mining is really 100 GHs of mining.    The 160 GHs is because of the claims that there was an additional 350 GHs not sold to users.  

The 100 GHs would be consistent with the awards seen over the last couple of months.    

So you admit only 100Gh/s of power mining, but if i remeber well, unfortunately i have no screenshot, before they disappear the hall of fame on the site about the top owners in mining power, owned very much more than 100Gh/s, so as you want to defend, there is always some liars in admins words.....
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 10:01:16 AM
is it possible to withdraw it all? if this case scrypt.cc can pay all investor  as back pay for their invest.....

It seems like withdraws are working but they take days.   It really seems like they are being processed on Friday nights in Brazil.   Maybe when there is a lot of booze flowing?
legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1009
September 07, 2015, 10:00:40 AM
@dyask, can you please give me the point (for example in this chart) https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-ltc.html where on 11-13 May 2015 when there was the power outrage, the fallen in the hashrate of 500Gh/s + 350Gh/s (private owner script.cc) that affected the farm ?

THERE IS NO 3 days of 850 Gh/s missing hashare on the carts only normal fluctuation.....

Where is the mining ? Also with the oroginal number that also you say that are true... 500+350 Gh/s

Please find that hashare down ... please....
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 09:59:47 AM
 
Scrypt.cc Admin claims to have sold 500 GHs of scrypt mining, I don't know any reason to doubt this as it is very consistent with what I and other saw.
 


So, first you see no reason to doubt, and then you say this:


My claim is the actual mining is probably closer to 160 GHs, of which 100 GHs has been sold to users.    



So, what made you change your mind before the end of your post?
lol, you need more focus, then you would see its just a scam plain and simple.

NO NO NO!!!

Scrypt.cc sold 500 GHs of mining.  (NO DOUBT HERE)  However I believe that 500 GHs of CLAIMED mining is really 100 GHs of mining.    The 160 GHs is because of the claims that there was an additional 350 GHs not sold to users.  

The 100 GHs would be consistent with the awards seen over the last couple of months.    
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1046
September 07, 2015, 09:59:06 AM
is it possible to withdraw it all? if this case scrypt.cc can pay all investor  as back pay for their invest.....
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 09:56:19 AM
Anyway, apologies if this has discussion has been heated at times. Despite that, it's been educational and ended on a positive note!

No worries from me, I've pretty thick skin.    I may have offended and that wasn't my intent either.    

The situation at scrypt.cc is very stressful, even as it is improving.   It causes a lot of heated debate.    

All anyone needs to do is look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=220936 if they want to know whether or not to trust what you're saying.

You bounce from Ponzi to Ponzi, scam to scam, and do your best to promote them to entice others. BTC-Arbs, Bitcoin-trader(dot)biz, Paycoin... all scams you promoted heavily in the face of evidence to the contrary:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6080055
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11129345
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11120912

It's sad that this is your involvement in the crypto community. No amount of semantics, word games, and dissection of pointless minutia will change that this is a giant scam based on a lie. It doesn't matter that you've been involved since Feb 2014, and you're now trying to debate the specific figure of how much fictitious hash is being sold. The point is, its all fake, and its all a lie, and you're promoting a scam.

Your negative trustrating is inappropriate.
He is just blatantly wrong with his assessments. To be wrong is no crime.

I have perceived him as very friendly over the forums.

Thanks!  I think ...  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
September 07, 2015, 09:53:54 AM
 
Scrypt.cc Admin claims to have sold 500 GHs of scrypt mining, I don't know any reason to doubt this as it is very consistent with what I and other saw.
 


So, first you see no reason to doubt, and then you say this:


My claim is the actual mining is probably closer to 160 GHs, of which 100 GHs has been sold to users.    



So, what made you change your mind before the end of your post?
lol, you need more focus, then you would see its just a scam plain and simple.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 503
September 07, 2015, 09:51:49 AM


The only payroll i'm on is my jobs.
Please provide proof of SCC's payroll. LOL.
It's not hard to follow the blockchain to see WD addresses.
Try harder.
Xoxo

The thing is, it is. You told us you'd received two 4 BTC withdrawals. You'll recall I've mentioned that I searched back through the transactions at the address you gave us, and failed to find any 4 BTC withdraws. I've mentioned this several times now, but I guess you keep missing my posts.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
September 07, 2015, 09:48:01 AM
Hey babe.
Nothing to complain bout here.
I'm still profitting at SCC and everything's functional for me.
Have been proffiting for the past 18 months.
Will continue profitting for the next 18 months and beyond.
Xoxo

Yes, it's easy when you're on the payroll. If I was ScryptCC staff I'm sure I'd be raking it in too, at the expense of people who invested. As always you fail to provide any evidence of your claims and you're unable to refute any of the evidence provided. Sure, go ahead, throw around a wallet address again. Interesting how you always seem to know which wallet the withdrawals are coming from before anyone else. Do you have any real evidence?

The only payroll i'm on is my jobs.
Please provide proof of SCC's payroll. LOL.
It's not hard to follow the blockchain to see WD addresses.
Try harder.
Xoxo
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 09:46:59 AM


My claim is the actual mining is probably closer to 160 GHs, of which 100 GHs has been sold to users.    


Please provide proof of this mining. Hashrate analysis has already shown this figure is not possible:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

Your theory is based on absolutely nothing and without definitive proof of mining there is no mining.

Please provide proof that scrypt.cc sold 6 THs of scrypt mining.   My claim is at least reasonable. 
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 07, 2015, 09:44:54 AM


My claim is the actual mining is probably closer to 160 GHs, of which 100 GHs has been sold to users.    


Please provide proof of this mining. Hashrate analysis has already shown this figure is not possible:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

Your theory is based on absolutely nothing and without definitive proof of mining there is no mining.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
September 07, 2015, 09:44:43 AM
anyway this situation looks strange.. I gonna wait till everything come back to normal.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 07, 2015, 09:43:07 AM
Hey babe.
Nothing to complain bout here.
I'm still profitting at SCC and everything's functional for me.
Have been proffiting for the past 18 months.
Will continue profitting for the next 18 months and beyond.
Xoxo

Yes, it's easy when you're on the payroll. If I was ScryptCC staff I'm sure I'd be raking it in too, at the expense of people who invested. As always you fail to provide any evidence of your claims and you're unable to refute any of the evidence provided. Sure, go ahead, throw around a wallet address again. Interesting how you always seem to know which wallet the withdrawals are coming from before anyone else. Do you have any real evidence?
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
September 07, 2015, 09:41:34 AM


Your negative trustrating is inappropriate.
He is just blatantly wrong with his assessments. To be wrong is no crime.

I have perceived him as very friendly over the forums.

Promoting ponzis deserves negative trust. Sorry if you don't agree but that's why we have this peer system. Just because his demeanor is friendly doesn't mean the scams aren't scams. BTC-Arbs was an obvious scam and so is ScryptCC.

I have never promoted a Ponzi.   Claiming I have is just a lie.     I didn't promote BTC-Arbs, it just thought it was a better choice over another arbitration site that turned scam.  

Scrypt.cc is a scam to you, I don't think it is the same you do.   I also haven't been promoting it.

So then I take it with all of your expertise and big talk, you have evidence that ScryptCC is in fact mining? Please post it here. And stop with the semantics - advocating BTC-Arbs as "a better choice" is promoting it. Let's discard your hard-on for the 6 Th/s for a minute... how exactly can you conclude ScryptCC is anything but a scam? Are you simply going to ignore the per MH reward math that was provided on the last page? You're here blathering about facts... where are your facts? Where's the proof of mining? Without proof of mining, nothing else you postulate matters because that's the initial lie from which all the other lies unfurl.

Where did I tell anyone to invest in BTCarbs?   I didn't.   The closest I came was comparing two arb sites.   That isn't promoting.    That was over a year ago and it is an issue now?   Those sites have been gone a long time!

Your 6 THs claim is bogus, 6 THs several times larger than all of scrypt mining.   That fact you won't admit it is likely a mistake and instead choose to attack doesn't show honor.    You only have attacks to back up your claim.  
  
Scrypt.cc Admin claims to have sold 500 GHs of scrypt mining, I don't know any reason to doubt this as it is very consistent with what I and other saw.   He also has claimed to have another 350 GHs with his partners that hasn't been sold to users, no way to confirm that.   The trading numbers at the site are consistent with a market the size of 500 GHs.   These claims have been made many times and it is pretty common knowledge.  

The awards have stabilized at about 1/5 of what they should have been.   Also from when they lost power there was a ~200 GHs hit on LTC mining.    The data is consistent for them having about 1/5 the mining they claim to have.    

When scrypt.cc was doing a lot of GPU mining it was actually possible to watch it, between status pages and reported hash rates.   That is much harder to do now with the ASIC mining.   I think they still do have some mining it is just a lot less than what was claimed, more like 20% of what was claimed.  


My claim is the actual mining is probably closer to 160 GHs, of which 100 GHs has been sold to users.    
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
September 07, 2015, 09:41:04 AM

Possible and probable. Note how quick a known shill aka ThorSWO is here to reply that all is well in the face of much evidence to the contrary.

Hey babe.
Nothing to complain bout here.
I'm still profitting at SCC and everything's functional for me.
Have been proffiting for the past 18 months.
Will continue profitting for the next 18 months and beyond.
Xoxo
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
September 07, 2015, 09:37:54 AM

Possible and probable. Note how quick a known shill aka ThorSWO is here to reply that all is well in the face of much evidence to the contrary.
Pages:
Jump to: