Let it go
SDC is 99% scam and it's final wall is being broken, thank God
e.g. No reply vs Cinni, No reply vs PoW change and No reply vs Zeuner scandal
Buy at your own peril..
There has been a reply on Zeuner. He needs more documentation. And the documentation is being written as we speak.
Then again, the software being developed is open-source and I encourage everyone to do their own research. Fact is that the technology being written is proof that this coin is not a scam. Check the github repository yourself.
0.3 BTC is a decent sum these days and I have my living expenses too.
Meh the documentation isn't being written for Zeuner, but he might be able to use it. Ryno has never been in contact with Zeuner, I believe it was ffmad and trollsroyce who were communicating with him. The consensus in the SDC community is that Zeuner is either lazy, not competent enough to dissect the source code, or doesn't believe he is being compensated enough to take on the work which he originally offered to do for free (I admit the code is a brilliant uncommented mess, but it still isn't that difficult to comb through).
False
Ryno and Zeuner corresponded once upon a time
I want my Zeuner donation refunded NOW
Quit toying with us. admit a failure and reimburse the donors
The peer review boat sailed a long time ago..
Do It.. 0.3 BTC pls
You're gonna have to ask Zeuner for it back I believe.
I think u mean the Team should cancel the review and handle refunds with Zeuners assistance. Sorry Isidor
0.3 BTC is a decent sum these days and I have my living expenses too.
Do you usually take your
donations back like this?
First time
Ryno et al have had almost 12 months to provide the docs ("the maths looks like Monero" P Todd's expert friend) and enough is enough.
As far as I can tell SDC is BTC with a CN token. Not necessarily difficult to code and NOT innovative.
OK, so by your logic – if it's not difficult to code, how can it be difficult to review without the docs?
"As far as I can tell..."
Yet couldn't figure out how SDC used zero knowledge proofs until someone told him.
As far as I can tell… based on conversation and comments of experts
I am not a programmer or a cryptographer or even a mathematician. It is cripplingly obvious that I (and most of the people in here, including you) should rely on expert opinions and quality peer review.
I have no bloody idea how ring sigs truly work and my head spins when I read the Cryptonote whitepaper. I am not in any way ashamed to admit that I rely on people like Zeuner to tell me if the cryptography and implementation are secure.
Many months ago Peter Todd's friend said of ShadowSendv2 that the maths looks like Monero. This ties in with everything smooth has said and my own personal experiences of CN coins and what the blockchains and inputs/outputs look like. All CN coins and ShadowSend suffer from fiddly sending requirements; often you'll have to try different values to send until it gets accepted. Since ShadowSend appears to be a CN token on BTC the mechanism by which one token is destroyed to create the other is critical and introduces potential vulnerabilities and vectors for exploit which do not exist in either CN or BTC alone.
When chatting with the CompScience PhD (who is highly involved with bitcoin) I explained how Shadow used two tokens, SDC and SDT:
Doc: Why?
Me: Why what?
Doc: Why does Shadow use two tokens?
pauseMe: Cause otherwise it would be like Monero?
Doc smilesMe: How difficult would that be to make?
Doc: Not necessarily so difficult at all
I was at first flummoxed by his Why two tokens? question. It was straight at the heart of the matter… what is even the point of it?
The SSv2 whitepaper has two names: Rynomaster and Tecnovert.
Tecnovert is described as the "in-house cryptographer". Using the cryptographer title suggests an academic training which is not demonstrated in the whitepaper since everybody I have spoken to (and smooth) agree it is poorly written, incomplete and unclear.
Since Tecnovert has never posted anywhere and has a dead github account I have even considered the possibilty he does not exist. Since he cant produce a decent whitepaper whith Ryno its moot anyway since he cannot explain his own work.
Now can I get a refund please? It would do you better to handle this matter than for me to ping Zeuner myself.