Great work, Glad that anon was broken so noone will lose money. I suspected it based on the qualify of code that was coming from this team, thus didnt realy expect it to be of commercial quality anyways.. I doubt they will be able to fix it, so id just remove the fteature altogether if i were you.
I suspect based on the number of misspelled words in your post that your ability to judge the quality of code probably isn't too spectacular. Still, you wouldn't be sidhujag if you didn't use this as an opportunity to shill for syscoin (as you have done with the majority of your posts in this thread).
It will be fixed.
Then prove me wrong and show me exactly which portions of Shadow's code you think are of poor quality (the part Shen's bug report relates to obviously excluded) and explain how you would improve upon then. Otherwise it just looks like you're here dishonestly casting aspersions on another project in the hope of promoting your own.
You made the claim so the burden of proof is on you. I'll be waiting.
the burden is NOT on me because you asked me, now if i dont have access to your code (tests) then i cant really answer your q and my original claim stands..
I guess i should have known you still havent grown up have you? The burden of proof on me just like it was on shen for proving his proof even though you guys refutted it with nonsense fud and 10 hours of testing (did you even do that?).. He had to go ahead and break the anon on the chain to prove it to you, that is very impolite and unprofessional! I guess someone who isnt really an engineer or scholar would never understand.
Thanks thats all i needed to know.. I will update the decentralized market manifesto and remove anon from sdc aswell as update some pertinent information.
