Topic: [SDC] ShadowCash | Welcome to the UMBRA - page 495. (Read 1289714 times)
lol was that really a attempt at fud lol pathetic
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol 
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
And only 280 users with over 100 coins. But those appear to be staking users. According to my calculations 12,352,120 coins were issued in the PoW and about half of those are appearing on the block explorer, so I guess half the coins aren't staking.
But being about half of that half is held by a dozen or so people, there is no way for these coins to be distributed without a major dump. So I'll wait!
You can wait but it wont help with distribution. Don't know where you are getting your numbers from tho. fyi that is not how staking and blockchains work currently. Coins are not stored in a file on one computer they do not show up when someone turns their wallet on and stakes. They are on everyones computers (blockchain), in case you didn't realise.
Code:
"moneysupply" : 6446477.48432312,
Its a shame in some ways that, but beneficial in the more important ones. I believe that its a slow start on a good project, brought out without the hype but thats the way it is i guess. To many people thinking these projects just have it all on day one. Thats what you get in a highly diluted alt coin space. Hard and fast then all tapped, confused because with jumping form coin to coin they failed to notice what it takes to actually get them going.. I'm ok with it this project the way it is. After all, Shadow is not trying to solve distribution. I don't think any of us would even be here doing this, if we didn't need to test things out. I believe it has the tech to justify and sustain whatever level its market finds. Cant force people to sell something they think they can get more for. See you when and if the world is using it, or at least a larger % of it. Until then tho, make sure you keep an eye out for this project.
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
And only 280 users with over 100 coins. But those appear to be staking users. According to my calculations 12,352,120 coins were issued in the PoW and about half of those are appearing on the block explorer, so I guess half the coins aren't staking.
But being about half of that half is held by a dozen or so people, there is no way for these coins to be distributed without a major dump. So I'll wait!
Where did you get these numbers?
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
And only 280 users with over 100 coins. But those appear to be staking users. According to my calculations 12,352,120 coins were issued in the PoW and about half of those are appearing on the block explorer, so I guess half the coins aren't staking.
But being about half of that half is held by a dozen or so people, there is no way for these coins to be distributed without a major dump. So I'll wait!
Total number of coins in circulation (6.4M) are shown here http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/stats/
Top addresses seem to be the exchanges. So the number of addresses on the richlist aren't correct. We need more people staking than leaving their coins on exchanges. Didn't anyone learn anything from mt gox and mintpal?
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
And only 280 users with over 100 coins. But those appear to be staking users. According to my calculations 12,352,120 coins were issued in the PoW and about half of those are appearing on the block explorer, so I guess half the coins aren't staking.
But being about half of that half is held by a dozen or so people, there is no way for these coins to be distributed without a major dump. So I'll wait!
Just out of curiosity.. you are on Twitter and Facebook – why not Google+?
Who are you speaking to? 
Just out of curiosity.. you are on Twitter and Facebook – why not Google+?
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
I'm one of those addresses! woo
Million dollar market cap is eminent.
Multi-Million market cap is incoming!
Million dollar market cap is eminent.
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
very nice article,thx
until we have the whitepaper, this articles summarizes the answers of FAQ
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
Once zk gets out of beta, I look forward to many such articles. We need to build the number of SDC users. Right now I only see 164 addresses with over 1000 coins:
http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=1000
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Good article, I liked it
It has been ages since I last posted on BitcoinTalk after serving out my second ban lol
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Anywayz, covered the public testing here.
Will ZK effectively end all competing privacy-centric altcoins (purely from an anon-tech standpoint)?
I guess what I am trying to ask is this: Is ZK the holy-grail of anonymity? And will it leave all other currently available anon-tech (such as DRK, XMR, XC, etc) obsolete, inferior, & nonsensical to use?
I guess what I am trying to ask is this: Is ZK the holy-grail of anonymity? And will it leave all other currently available anon-tech (such as DRK, XMR, XC, etc) obsolete, inferior, & nonsensical to use?
The short answer - yes.
(...)
Cool story indeed! Will definitely watch this.
Btw excellent redesign! (Yeah I know I came late..)
You are very early actually (i know what you mean btw). The core isn't even finished yet and mainstream isn't using it. I argue that you are still early on bitcoin too. So, welcome, pull up a pew or find something to do
Like maybe you could make a cool/er website for shadow.cash?Early you say? I thought SDC is here for some time (well yeah, if you compare it to BTC being used by general public, I am early).. or am I confusing it with something else (like ShadowCoin, or it just evolved)?
Cooler Shadow.cash website you say? I don't think I'm capable of making it better. In fact, I'm in love with it ATM (as I said, the redesign is amazing).
But I'd love to help out somehow, if the time comes :]
testing has been going good, experience no problems so far
Can anyone help me explain:
If blockchain is unreadable, in combination with snarks and rings and what not. How can we be sure of the total amount of coins in existence? Is it still possibile to see that? What if someone would try to cheat the amount?
Sorry for my Noobiness.
If blockchain is unreadable, in combination with snarks and rings and what not. How can we be sure of the total amount of coins in existence? Is it still possibile to see that? What if someone would try to cheat the amount?
Sorry for my Noobiness.
So did they get snarks to work?
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/261/shadowcash-proof-of-zero-knowledge-on-the-testnet
So they got zk to work awsome!!! but did they get snarks.
Zk w/ ring sigs for now. Snarks to replace ring sigs later.
So did they get snarks to work?
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/261/shadowcash-proof-of-zero-knowledge-on-the-testnet
So they got zk to work awsome!!! but did they get snarks.
Loading the Android wallet- looks like it's syncing up to about 60K blocks left and freezing up. Good wifi connection. Normal, or do I need to do something with my phone?
Sorry if this has already been asked & answered, long topic! Can't wait to start staking!
Sorry if this has already been asked & answered, long topic! Can't wait to start staking!
Truth be told, Android wallet sucks in my opinion.
If you have it running in the background, it will probably have syncing issues.
I do believe the devs are going to redesign the wallet with a friendlier UI and using their SPV code for faster syncing and smaller blockchain. Can't wait for that.
i am sure after ZK-snarks full release dev team will solve it
in my computer i am using lite wallet, and it works perfectly and sync very fast....so why not android wallet in the future
It might be nice to have the whole thing living on a SD card. That way there would be less of a problem with blockchain size, and you could swap cards and move your wallet to a new phone. Maybe even trade the cards as a form of physical SDC.
Hey Automatic Monkey,
Thanks for the input. I would suggest creating a feature request on Shadowtalk. It's easier for the team to consider improvements when they are easier to find. Feedback via bitcointalk posts tend to get lost because it's one giant thread.
http://shadowtalk.org/category/5/feedback-feature-requests
Jump to: