Topic: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts - page 216. (Read 1404011 times)
June 04, 2013, 02:54:23 AM
The entire team is working on the issue. Should be back soon, stay tuned.
June 04, 2013, 02:53:17 AM
Lol rigtards.
I can't access the site at all now -- it won't load in my browser.
I can't access the site at all now -- it won't load in my browser.
That's because seals is always down. It's just one fucked up joke.
June 04, 2013, 02:42:46 AM
Lol rigtards.
I can't access the site at all now -- it won't load in my browser.
I can't access the site at all now -- it won't load in my browser.
June 04, 2013, 02:13:32 AM
poker is bad enough not being rigged, and your site is rigged.
I imagine so. I am surprised you play rigged poker at all considering how bad you get raped at fair poker...
It is just so annoying to see rig tards not take the time to understand how hard it is to rig a site and not get caught with how everything can be recorded and evaluated by anyone at all. It is how the superuser at UB was caught, similar methods work on all types of rigging.
They make enough money from rake, no reason to risk that by attempting to get away with any sort of rigging.
June 04, 2013, 02:05:45 AM
poker is bad enough not being rigged, and your site is rigged.
I imagine so. I am surprised you play rigged poker at all considering how bad you get raped at fair poker...
June 04, 2013, 01:58:42 AM
Estimate on when issue will be fixed?
Optimistically an hour.
I hope it's more time than that because poker is bad enough not being rigged, and your site is rigged. Never in real live play do I get the same fucking cards every hand, and it never seems to be aces.
Never in live play do you play/see thousands upon thousands of hands. Before online poker, some pros never even made a royal flush.
You clearly are blind on how the world works.
June 04, 2013, 01:53:30 AM
Estimate on when issue will be fixed?
Optimistically an hour.
I hope it's more time than that because poker is bad enough not being rigged, and your site is rigged. Never in real live play do I get the same fucking cards every hand, and it never seems to be aces.
June 04, 2013, 01:46:51 AM
Estimate on when issue will be fixed?
Optimistically an hour.
June 04, 2013, 01:39:18 AM
Estimate on when issue will be fixed?
June 04, 2013, 01:33:48 AM
Can I please be let back as joeyjmr8484. TY
June 04, 2013, 01:26:56 AM
Thanks, Free! 
June 04, 2013, 01:21:00 AM
June 04, 2013, 01:10:18 AM
We are investigating now.
June 04, 2013, 01:01:26 AM
F***, same here -- I came to ask a question about my google authenticator, I thought it was screwed up somehow.
June 04, 2013, 01:00:35 AM
People panicking that can't access cashier?
If you log out you cannot get back in... Can anyone else confirm this?
confirmed.
i am unable to login from the website as well ("Bad Login").
can you confirm this?
Yeah when I saw CASHIER error it was weird because I could join tables and what not.. I made the mistake of coming out of client now I cannot get back on the site or through client..
June 04, 2013, 12:59:11 AM
People panicking that can't access cashier?
If you log out you cannot get back in... Can anyone else confirm this?
confirmed.
i am unable to login from the website as well ("Bad Login").
can you confirm this?
June 04, 2013, 12:57:28 AM
People panicking that can't access cashier?
If you log out you cannot get back in... Can anyone else confirm this?
June 04, 2013, 12:49:19 AM
People panicking that can't access cashier?
June 04, 2013, 12:28:32 AM
Can I please be let back as joeyjmr8484. Please, you should have just given me a warning like you are doing about others that people complained about collusion.
June 03, 2013, 11:46:59 PM
If you have 2 people left, and one asks to check it down, openly, I don't see any problem with that. The other person has no obligation to honor that. They could keep checking it down, until the last possible moment for action, and then that player pushes all-in if they want to. Neither is bound to honor 'check it down?'
Since they are the only two left active, and are open about it for all to see, what is the problem?
If they were colluding in private pretending to not be doing so I would agree, that's a problem and needs to be dealt with, but openly agreeing to check it down, I don't think counts as 'colluding'.
This kind of table talk I have seen lots of times at real tables. Most of the time when chopping blinds, where the last two remaining players ask and agree to an action.
If those two were doing so consistently, then maybe it would be worth investigating.
My 2 cents...
-- Smoov
Since they are the only two left active, and are open about it for all to see, what is the problem?
If they were colluding in private pretending to not be doing so I would agree, that's a problem and needs to be dealt with, but openly agreeing to check it down, I don't think counts as 'colluding'.
This kind of table talk I have seen lots of times at real tables. Most of the time when chopping blinds, where the last two remaining players ask and agree to an action.
If those two were doing so consistently, then maybe it would be worth investigating.
My 2 cents...
-- Smoov
This all depends on the people, really. In RL games I've seen times where the last 3-4 people in a tournament would just agree to split the pot according to estimated ratios. Some will split evenly. Sometimes people get infuriated at the idea of it.
Something I've learned from playing is that even though you may experience something being accepted in some rooms, others may have rules against it.
I agree, by the way, that agreeing between two people to check it down would NOT be colluding.
For the record, I got in trouble in one room because I was heads-up against someone and went all-in. He was taking forever to make his decision so I told him what I had and flipped over my cards to make it easier. I ended up being force-folded for it, although it was just me and him anyways.
Jump to: