So just to be clear what this thread is about...
You want to present another meaningless thread regarding the meaningless accumulation of meaningless merits, but the twist with this one is you are creating rules like first to earn 990 rather than earn 1000 to become a RULZ champ so that you have a great chance to be the first??
Ha ha, meta board. hehe..
0 - 1000 is the only RULZ champ that will be acceptable. Starting with 10?? first to earn 990? hehehe
What about first legend to have iasenko in their username?? is the only real champ?
The 0 - 1000 that does not lose 70% + of the merits if you take their top 20 cycling fans and meta board merits away is the only RULZ legend that can be the champ of that pretty meaningless heap with any shred of credibility.
Come on guys this is getting beyond silly.
RULZ champs ONLY
say NO to fake RULZ champs. haha
Any one claiming false RULZ should be shunned.
Topic: Self-made Legendary Observer - we have the second Legendary-joniboini, Congrats! - page 6. (Read 2583 times)
November 11, 2019, 12:01:36 PM
November 11, 2019, 11:45:45 AM
My name is here so I'm proud of it.
Total earned merits are not the only factor to judge one user is a good one or vice versa but I hope that I am a 'good' user of the forum. Just thinking of a good user because I think that I am too far from a higher level, a truly valuable asset of the forum, that I aim at for next few years.
I have a club of top merited users (250+) so it contains some statistics that you can use. The club updated weekly with helpful hands from LoyceV. So if DdmrDdmr won't give you updates for whatever reasons, you can use my club's updates as alternative.
[CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
Total earned merits are not the only factor to judge one user is a good one or vice versa but I hope that I am a 'good' user of the forum. Just thinking of a good user because I think that I am too far from a higher level, a truly valuable asset of the forum, that I aim at for next few years.
I have a club of top merited users (250+) so it contains some statistics that you can use. The club updated weekly with helpful hands from LoyceV. So if DdmrDdmr won't give you updates for whatever reasons, you can use my club's updates as alternative.
[CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
November 11, 2019, 10:08:13 AM
@Iasenko,
If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.
If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:
a) Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b) Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).
I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.
Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.
If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.
If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:
a) Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b) Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).
I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.
Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea, maybe we can update it every 2 weeks and see if anyone has ranked up to Leg. during that time. That would be cool
Thank you again for the assitance, !Muchísimas gracias, hombre!
November 11, 2019, 09:08:11 AM
~snip~
Thank you for correcting me. Interesting,the second one was correct.
You are welcome. I guessed it that it was a typo error in there. Thank you for correcting me. Interesting,the second one was correct.
Anyway, Great achievement buddies. When merit was implemented everyone (most I would say if I have to correct it) thought that this is the end of the ranking system but you lot proved those guys wrong. Keep up the good works.
November 11, 2019, 08:14:59 AM
Still too far from the minimume required activity to be included in that list.
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
I am a patient man, btw. I have to be.
Churning activitiy is way more tiring than merits!
I am a patient man, btw. I have to be.
November 11, 2019, 07:17:51 AM
@Iasenko,
If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.
If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:
a) Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b) Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).
I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.
Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.
If you want, I can provide you weekly updates of the base file. It’s pretty easy once I calculate my weekly stuff for the Merit Dashboard, so I can provide an update every Friday evening/ Saturday morning at the latest.
If you want me to do it, just let me know if you want me to:
a) Update the same file (so as not to change the Google Link).
b) Create a different file each week (if you want access to each week’s data).
I could also trim the account creation time in the process if you don’t want to display the time.
Note: sometimes, we will see a "startedwith" that seems inconsistent. For example, @tranthidung displays 1 merit for this column. What happened in this case (and a few others) is that the profile is merited between the moment the forum generates the merit.txt file, and I scrape the profile data (the TXs + airdrop do not add up to the merit on the profile, and thus startedwith has a non-expected value). It’s just a tiny hiccup, that does not affect too many profiles.
<...> maybe we can update it every 2 weeks <...>
Ok... 
November 11, 2019, 06:29:08 AM
~snip~
Chimk is one of the best merit source at the moment, he is number 1 on your list. Chimk is also responsible for increasing the ranking of several other users as I can find in BPIP. Those on the list are the best posters, and it is appropriate that they will rise to become Legendary in the future.
November 11, 2019, 06:25:02 AM
~
PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D
PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D
Thank you for correcting me. Interesting,the second one was correct.
Ill update the list, I see some people who registered earlier but had 10 airdropped merit because of missing a 14 days cycle.
November 11, 2019, 06:18:53 AM
Unlucky me that I was already a hero at that time :-P
It's such a privilege to be a Legendary from 0 merit.
PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D
It's such a privilege to be a Legendary from 0 merit.
PS: By the way, "Legendary" spells with an "a" after "d" :-D
November 11, 2019, 06:10:51 AM
Wow, they sure progressed fast. Congrats to them!
November 11, 2019, 06:02:36 AM
This deserves to be here:
Updated.
Updated.
~
Here is the list. There are some issues (you'll notice negative starting merits) due to the art and/or caption contests
Here is the list. There are some issues (you'll notice negative starting merits) due to the art and/or caption contests
UserId |UserName |TsRegistered|Position |PostCount|Activity|Merit|Airdropped|
-------|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|--------|-----|----------|
1582324|DdmrDdmr | 2018-01-04|Hero Member |4112 |742 |3237 | 0|
1852120|fillippone | 2018-02-18|Hero Member |2942 |588 |2274 | 0|
3 |satoshi | 2009-11-19|Founder |575 |364 |2398 | 250|
2033515|mikeywith | 2018-04-14|Hero Member |3457 |658 |1839 | 0|
2143453|1miau | 2018-05-21|Hero Member |1928 |616 |1746 | 0|
1878246|abhiseshakana | 2018-02-25|Hero Member |1857 |658 |1572 | -2|
1291828|iasenko | 2017-11-07|Hero Member |3337 |812 |1563 | 10|
1138727|VB1001 | 2017-09-04|Sr. Member |2754 |476 |1480 | 0|
897509 |xtraelv | 2016-09-09|Hero Member |2223 |924 |1557 | 100|
1000199|krogothmanhattan | 2017-05-11|Hero Member |7319 |994 |1625 | 250|
1177936|Veleor | 2017-09-29|Hero Member |1778 |840 |1424 | 99|
2003859|DireWolfM14 | 2018-04-04|Copper Member|2253 |644 |1271 | 0|
1554927|bitmover | 2017-12-31|Hero Member |3869 |728 |1250 | 0|
1051955|roycilik | 2017-07-02|Hero Member |2289 |938 |1347 | 98|
1292764|tranthidung | 2017-11-08|Hero Member |3092 |700 |1213 | 0|
1574226|mu_enrico | 2018-01-03|Copper Member|1948 |756 |1176 | 0|
1339716|coinlocket$ | 2017-11-22|Hero Member |5458 |798 |1180 | 10|
188198 |Piggy | 2013-12-12|Hero Member |4629 |784 |1407 | 250|
1825672|morvillz7z | 2018-02-11|Hero Member |1479 |616 |1151 | 0|
1169179|BitCryptex | 2017-09-25|Hero Member |1529 |826 |1157 | 10|
1855828|taikuri13 | 2018-02-19|Hero Member |3553 |714 |1127 | 0|
976210 |nullius | 2017-03-29|Copper Member|1017 |210 |1120 | 0|
1827294|Husna QA | 2018-02-12|Hero Member |1563 |700 |1117 | 0|
879277 |Coding Enthusiast | 2016-07-18|Hero Member |733 |733 |1348 | 249|
1433865|witcher_sense | 2017-12-14|Hero Member |2015 |770 |1097 | 0|
1980983|Coolcryptovator | 2018-03-28|Copper Member|4016 |672 |1095 | 0|
1982152|lovesmayfamilis | 2018-03-28|Hero Member |1549 |560 |1078 | -1|
1052091|CryptopreneurBrainboss| 2017-07-02|Hero Member |2344 |686 |1033 | 9|
1180530|theyoungmillionaire | 2017-10-01|Sr. Member |376 |376 |1011 | 0|
November 11, 2019, 06:02:05 AM
Ranked Up to Legendary
1st. o_e_l_e_o - Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
2nd. joniboini - Ranked up at 812 Activity (15.01.20)
We are soon entering in the period when if there was not a merit system people should rank up to Legendary.
That's why I'm making this list to see who will enter into the Rank Up Legendary Zone (RULZ) who have received already minimum 990
How it is calculated.
If you account is registered between 9.10.17 - 3.12.17 you most likely was a Member/Jr. or Newbie account in that time, ( included Member rank as well because 10 airdropped merit are only 1% of the requirement for legendary so it's basically nothing.. and of course I'm in the list as well.
) I can do it .
We are not that far from Activity 775, just a few weeks more so let's keep an eye who's gonna be the first Legendary
Users who registed between 9.10.17 and 3.12.17 and have received 990 + meirt
To be included when reaching the merit requirement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Updated list with people who had 10 airdropped merit despite the registration date and have over 990 received merit.
Planning to do the same for those who registered after 25.01.18 in a couple of months then their planned activity get closed to the Leg. requirement as well as for those who were Full members at that time.
All the credit for the stats goes to DdmrDdmr. Big thanks buddy
1st. o_e_l_e_o - Ranked up at 798 Ativity (01.01.20)
2nd. joniboini - Ranked up at 812 Activity (15.01.20)
We are soon entering in the period when if there was not a merit system people should rank up to Legendary.
That's why I'm making this list to see who will enter into the Rank Up Legendary Zone (RULZ) who have received already minimum 990
How it is calculated.
If you account is registered between 9.10.17 - 3.12.17 you most likely was a Member/Jr. or Newbie account in that time, ( included Member rank as well because 10 airdropped merit are only 1% of the requirement for legendary so it's basically nothing.. and of course I'm in the list as well.
) I can do it . We are not that far from Activity 775, just a few weeks more so let's keep an eye who's gonna be the first Legendary
Users who registed between 9.10.17 and 3.12.17 and have received 990 + meirt
| user_id | name | datecreated | rank | posts | activity | merit | MeritReceived | startedwith | meritsent |
| 1291828 | iasenko | 2017-11-07 20:39:50.000 | Hero Member | 3090 | 742 | 1301 | 1291 | 10 | 637 |
| 1275282 | joniboini | 2017-11-02 21:27:07.000 | Hero Member | 3810 | 742 | 1161 | 1151 | 10 | 1385 |
| 1339716 | coinlocket$ | 2017-11-22 20:49:45.000 | Hero Member | 5128 | 728 | 1111 | 1101 | 10 | 369 |
To be included when reaching the merit requirement.
| user_id | name | datecreated | rank | posts | activity | merit | MeritReceived | startedwith | meritsent |
| 1304130 | pandukelana2712 | 2017-11-12 06:20:14.000 | Hero Member | 1185 | 686 | 885 | 875 | 10 | 565 |
| 1202061 | chimk | 2017-10-10 01:22:39.000 | Hero Member | 3718 | 784 | 780 | 680 | 100 | 11774 |
| 1292764 | tranthidung | 2017-11-08 06:22:57.000 | Hero Member | 2473 | 630 | 771 | 770 | 1 | 280 |
| 1311641 | tvplus006 | 2017-11-14 12:14:59.000 | Hero Member | 1455 | 658 | 760 | 750 | 10 | 375 |
| 1237156 | nc50lc | 2017-10-22 03:10:16.000 | Hero Member | 1735 | 770 | 656 | 646 | 10 | 292 |
| 1283017 | masulum | 2017-11-05 11:51:39.000 | Hero Member | 1323 | 588 | 524 | 524 | 0 | 152 |
| 1237522 | Plutosky | 2017-10-22 06:41:53.000 | Hero Member | 932 | 714 | 512 | 502 | 10 | 221 |
| 1210969 | JSRAW | 2017-10-13 00:42:46.000 | Hero Member | 2155 | 518 | 510 | 510 | 0 | 255 |
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Updated list with people who had 10 airdropped merit despite the registration date and have over 990 received merit.
| user_id | name | datecreated | rank | posts | activity | merit | MeritReceived | startedwith | meritsent |
| 1291828 | iasenko | 2017-11-07 20:39:50.000 | Hero Member | 3090 | 742 | 1301 | 1291 | 10 | 637 |
| 1275282 | joniboini | 2017-11-02 21:27:07.000 | Hero Member | 3810 | 742 | 1161 | 1151 | 10 | 1385 |
| 1339716 | coinlocket$ | 2017-11-22 20:49:45.000 | Hero Member | 5128 | 728 | 1111 | 1101 | 10 | 369 |
| 1169179 | BitCryptex | 2017-09-25 13:17:36.000 | Hero Member | 1436 | 742 | 1072 | 1062 | 10 | 516 |
Planning to do the same for those who registered after 25.01.18 in a couple of months then their planned activity get closed to the Leg. requirement as well as for those who were Full members at that time.
All the credit for the stats goes to DdmrDdmr. Big thanks buddy
Jump to: