There is no way to avoid this. There are always people who want to get all the relevant KYC data for verification.
Topic: Sending in fake ID for KYC - page 46. (Read 89364 times)
I agree that you should not send your real data to anyone. There is a high probability that they can fall into the hands of bad guys. For yourselves, to transfer fictitious data, no one will check a particular person from the other end of the world.
Thia ia one of the disadvantages getting online transactions using blockchain unless otherwise thumb marks are used plus one on one video calls. Been part of a group too and I should really say that was unfair.
I firmly believe that Know Your Customer isn´t a suitable process for many cryptocurrencies. These don´t own the righs of securities and must not require of that approach.
this is a controversial issue, as probably many people thought about it. but, on the other hand, it will quickly become clear, and besides it is necessary to do selfie. however, this procedure is generally not safe, because you can use your data for criminal purposes
Verifying the identity to accept the account is essential to protect the interests and assets of the user, I do not complain about this, so will control the account to create name
a serious discussion of such a pressing problem in the forum.Who is afraid to send documents-do not send.who sends fake documents to a crook and a thief.Here because of such people the others also are afraid to send documents for KYC check.who can tell me how your documents without your presence can have some value.
This is the normal reaction of a person from crypto world - trying to hide private data and provide fake. It's okay! fair or not, it doesn't matter. The main thing is that if managers are satisfied with this, then it isn't so important for the project, otherwise they would not have passed. take it easy!
1- Managers are not the authorised people to have access to your documents specially KYC.2- Sending fake documents is not okay and most of the time they will be rejected if the ICO is legit and they're doing the KYC verifications through a third party agency.
3- ICO's are not authorised to take KYC of any citizens unless they have satisfied the business conditions of the government they have registered with.
This is the normal reaction of a person from crypto world - trying to hide private data and provide fake. It's okay! fair or not, it doesn't matter. The main thing is that if managers are satisfied with this, then it isn't so important for the project, otherwise they would not have passed. take it easy!
I agree what you say, the company that receives the KYC should be careful to check the incoming identity data, because if it is still like that, it is unfair to the person sending the real data.
So many newbie accounts, spreading fake ID for KYC, and apparently abuse campaigns. Btw, is no privacy in Internet
KYC documents publicly? I do not understand but the forged documents are accepted not good. The imprisonment information, the real personal information is exposed. This problem is difficult to solve
I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
we can see it for not being fair, but even if they are not being fair, we can do nothing about that, we cant trace those people who try to fake their kyc. its hard to trace them. NOT FAIR.
I don't think of sending the fake ID to fulfill the KYC process. Why? I'm sure that the developer and team have their best systems to sort the document input in KYC. With their system, they may probably know which is authentic and which is fake. Hopefully, there is no person who sends the fake ID.
In fact, I believe that quite a large number of people use fake documents in order to undergo the procedure of KYC. I can not blame them for anything, Because they care about their safety.
That's why I don't believe KYC procedure. I have seen many spammers in a few days to submit a fake profile. Most of spammets stole people's identity, and they submit it for KYC. I think project owners should be more strict or they should use Icosid KYC system. Ivosid is a very good option to prevent fake KYC.
I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
NOT FAIR.
actualy this is the first time i've heards this kind of case,thats theres something who passes there kyc thats submitted a fake documents,because as far as i know everything thats you must passed is filtered and documented into there own control,so therefore when i've heard this kinds of feed news im shock and wondering,thats theres possibility thats its should happen.
I believe that the conduct of the KYC check for participants in the ICO generosity campaign is generally illegal, because we are not investors in ICO projects and can not launder dirty money. Therefore, if the ICO team allows us to commit illegal acts against us, I fully admit the possibility of sending them as their identity and copies of documents of other persons, if this can not be avoided. On this site we work anonymously and this should remain in the future.
I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
NOT FAIR.
Therefore this will explain that KYC is not really helping to make the crypto world safe and will become useless as other people are trying hard just to submit and pass their KYC and the others will not but in this case its look like a waste of time so i'm afraid that if the government will found about this problem then i think they will also find a solution that it will make the KYC to become more difficult froms
I believe that people should have the right to remain anonymous if they participate in the ico. This KYC procedure is truly absurd
Jump to: