Pages:
Author

Topic: SHAME ON YOU - page 2. (Read 3560 times)

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
June 30, 2015, 10:36:03 AM
#69
Ah, I see, no. No you don't recognise anything outside of your own warped prejudice and hatred.

Oh... see who is giving lectures on prejudice and hatred. You are the one who hate people just because they happen to have a different skin color from yours. Jealous of white skin?

Study: everyone hates ignorant privileged white American males.

"Study"  Roll Eyes

As someone who pointed out here correctly, you seems to be a black female, who is jealous of people belonging to the other races.
As a white male I take that as a great compliment, it means I'm doing well at universal empathy and checking my privilege.

You should try it, it feels good to feel empathy for everyone you meet.

Hatred and bigotry don't feel good, especially later in life when you realize what an ignorant, awful human being you used to be.

legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
June 30, 2015, 10:23:26 AM
#68
Ah, I see, no. No you don't recognise anything outside of your own warped prejudice and hatred.

Oh... see who is giving lectures on prejudice and hatred. You are the one who hate people just because they happen to have a different skin color from yours. Jealous of white skin?

Study: everyone hates ignorant privileged white American males.

"Study"  Roll Eyes

As someone who pointed out here correctly, you seems to be a black female, who is jealous of people belonging to the other races.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
June 30, 2015, 09:58:48 AM
#67
这需要很多年,了解中国。
那是真实的
不再

A marriage is an union between a man and a woman.
Marriage is little more than an obsolete vestigial organ leftover from the feudal age, when women were property. Marriage will gone in a few generations, along with religion.



legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 30, 2015, 09:42:16 AM
#66
China is majority Atheist,
Mainland China is still a very superstitious place, not particularly scientifically inclined by western standards. Not a fair comparison though as they're just having their industrial revolution now, we had ours 150 years ago.

There's still the very problematic ancestor-worship and elder-wisdom myths going on in that culture, it's a culture extremely friendly to dogma. This culture inhibits disobedience, which in turn retards social progress.

That's why China has had so many revolutions, they build up enough repressed frustration and then - BOOM!





这需要很多年,了解中国。


那是真实的


legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
June 30, 2015, 08:44:29 AM
#65
because there is 39 times more black on white crime than white on black crime.

These are the facts which the political correctness lobby is trying to hide. Everyone goes ballistic when the Jewish-funded mainstream media complains that the incarceration rate for Blacks is more than 10 times of that for the whites. But they ignore the fact that Blacks are far more likely to commit violent crimes, when compared to the whites.

Another fact that the PC lobby tries to hide is the relation between pedophilia and homosexuality. Homosexuals are far more likely to abuse children, when compared to heterosexuals. But off course, anyone who points that out is being labeled as a bigot.

http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13722/
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
June 30, 2015, 08:30:11 AM
#64

Here's the thing, why are you concerned about race mixing? It doesn't have any rational basis. Your 'concern' is disconcerting.

As for black-on-white crime, is there something different about black-on-white crime than any other kind of crime? What about black-on-black or white-on-white or the whole lot kinda mixed up into one coffee-coloured criminal act?

Concern about crime, yes, that is valid. 'Concern' about black-on-white crime is less about the crime and more about your hatred for black people.
because there is 39 times more black on white crime than white on black crime. the fewer blacks we have around us, the less crime there is, but we aren't allowed to say that without always mentioning that it is white people's fault that blacks are committing the crimes against them

Quote
No, but do you know a stone-cold mother-fucking fact about people who go out and commit racist hate crimes? They are racists. They perceive the world through their nasty racism and prejudices and you, you who might not actually do the deed and assault someone for being 'the wrong colour', you are part of their supporting network of 'sympathisers in general agreement'. You are an apologist for violent racism. You help fuel the fire inside their belly which drives them towards their racist violent acts.
dylan roof doesn't have any sympathisers. if he'd shot some up some crips or new black panthers some white nationalist types might have been like ok fair enough but what he did was counterproductive. idiots shooting peaceful , religious blacks fills the people we need to get on our side with more guilt and self hatred.

Quote
I don't for a second believe that this 'violence' you speak of from equal-rights campaigners arises out of nothing. I'm pretty confident you're simply referring to people who won't simply keep quiet while their liberty is being assaulted.
i mean everyone from the assholes in black masks who go on anti austerity demonstrations and set fire to cars and businesses right up the the assassins and bomb planters we've seen recently in greece.

Quote
TBH, though, it's probably not even that you're actually stopped from declaring your hatred freely, it's more likely that if you go to a place where decent human beings gather and readily announce your bigotry and hatred, they'll not want to associate with you.
thousands of people are in prison for refusing to believe in the jewish gas chamber hoax. kids are being reported to the police for saying sodomy is wrong. a family had their polish foster kids taken away because they were members of ukip (british political party)

you may think these thought controls wont come to america but a recent poll shows 40% of people now support the introduction of "hate speech" legislation
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 08:01:02 AM
#63
the nut jobs being motivated by concerns over race mixing and high black on white crime

Here's the thing, why are you concerned about race mixing? It doesn't have any rational basis. Your 'concern' is disconcerting.

As for black-on-white crime, is there something different about black-on-white crime than any other kind of crime? What about black-on-black or white-on-white or the whole lot kinda mixed up into one coffee-coloured criminal act?

Concern about crime, yes, that is valid. 'Concern' about black-on-white crime is less about the crime and more about your hatred for black people.

doesn't mean everyone who shares some of those concerns wants to go out and murder random blacks,

No, but do you know a stone-cold mother-fucking fact about people who go out and commit racist hate crimes? They are racists. They perceive the world through their nasty racism and prejudices and you, you who might not actually do the deed and assault someone for being 'the wrong colour', you are part of their supporting network of 'sympathisers in general agreement'. You are an apologist for violent racism. You help fuel the fire inside their belly which drives them towards their racist violent acts.

the pro-sodomy antifa activists are renowned for their violence but no one ever mentions them

I don't for a second believe that this 'violence' you speak of from equal-rights campaigners arises out of nothing. I'm pretty confident you're simply referring to people who won't simply keep quiet while their liberty is being assaulted.

In any event, here's the thing you're missing. Violence is wrong from either side. Doesn't change the simple truth, though. You have no basis by which to declare yourself more important than a gay person. You are not special. Nobody is special. We are all human beings and some are healthy and well-balanced functional people and others, like you, harbour toxic hatred against other human beings for no apparent reason other than you don't like how they want to live as equals to you.

you can either go along with their agenda or accept being ostracised at school/university/workplace and have life made very difficult for you, because , so the jews tell us, who in their right mind wants a crazy person who sympathises with the views of a crazy mass shooter around them

Awwww, are the bad people stopping you from declaring your hatred freely?

TBH, though, it's probably not even that you're actually stopped from declaring your hatred freely, it's more likely that if you go to a place where decent human beings gather and readily announce your bigotry and hatred, they'll not want to associate with you.

So its not like your 'free speech' is being trampled on, it is actually more a case of you having to learn that there are consequences to that free speech as a result of it showing people your nasty and hate-filled mind.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 07:42:49 AM
#62
You know what makes a civilization great? Being civilized. Treating human beings as equals. That is civilized.

Treating humans as equal doesn't mean that everyone should allow faggot gay marriage.

:facepalm:

Yes. Yes it does you fucking dim-witted numpty bigot. That's what 'treating humans as equal' means, that you don't get to pick and choose what people can or cannot do based on their gender, orientation or skin colour.

Get it? That is what 'equality' means. Treating people equally. Not discriminating against some of them by telling them they are not allowed to have an adult relationship with the same legal recognition as other adult relationships.

A marriage is an union between a man and a woman. For the last one million years or so, this has been practised.

Ah 'Tradition', possibly the worst justification for anything, ever. So, do you believe that simply because a practice has generally been done repeatedly a certain way for a long time that it lends any credence to the practice concerned? Because I suggest you go take a fucking look at some of the atrocities and barbaric acts of 'tradition' that human beings are routinely capable of.

If you do something repeatedly simply because it has been done repeatedly before, you're clearly an idiot and quite a dangerous idiot at that.

If the gay marriage is legalized, then tomorrow you will argue in favor of legalizing marriage between humans and animals.

Why? Why would I do that? What connection is there between two humans having their adult relationship legally recognised and human/animal relationships?

Your argument is the 'slippery slope' fallacy and is false.



legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
June 30, 2015, 07:28:23 AM
#61
Let me guess, you're one of those nut-jobs who EVEN IN THE FACE OF EXPLICIT RACIST MANIFESTO, want to spin it that your idol only killed those black people because . . . drum-roll please . . .they were Christian! It was a hate-crime against Xtians, wasn't it, nothing to do with racism or anything like that. The confederacy wasn't about hating the blacks and wanting to continue treating them like animals, like property, noooooo, the confederates were simply 'Rebels' right?
the nut jobs being motivated by concerns over race mixing and high black on white crime rates doesn't mean everyone who shares some of those concerns wants to go out and murder random blacks, any more that some traditionalists in africa going queer bashing means everyone in the world who opposes the sodomite rights agenda wants to murder homosexuals for being mentally ill

the pro-sodomy antifa activists are renowned for their violence but no one ever mentions them

this is how the liberal agenda spreads so quickly and gains acceptance everywhere that has a zionist controlled media. everyone is afraid to speak out against it. it spits out the same bs day after day and anyone who disagrees with it is painted out to be a psycho who wants to lynch people or re-colonise the empire or bring back slavery and whatever nasty things the liberals can come up with, and you can either go along with their agenda or accept being ostracised at school/university/workplace and have life made very difficult for you, because , so the jews tell us, who in their right mind wants a crazy person who sympathises with the views of a crazy mass shooter around them
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
June 30, 2015, 07:28:01 AM
#60
You know what makes a civilization great? Being civilized. Treating human beings as equals. That is civilized.

Treating humans as equal doesn't mean that everyone should allow faggot marriage. A marriage is an union between a man and a woman. For the last one million years or so, this has been practised. If the gay marriage is legalized, then tomorrow you will argue in favor of legalizing marriage between humans and animals.
copper member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 575
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
June 30, 2015, 06:47:45 AM
#59
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 06:30:15 AM
#58
The majority of fundamentalist Xtians oppose gay-rights, yes.
but the majority of people who are opposed to it are not christians

The majority of people opposed to homosexuality ARE theists. Simply because it takes a certain kind of ignorance to rage against something that has zero effect on your personal life. It takes the kind of ignorant demand for deference and respect infantile followers of mythical magic-man-in-the-sky 'believers' think they are entitled to.

Let me ask you a quick question, why are you so fixated on sodomy? Do gay men force bakers and public officials to watch them have their gay-bum-sex?

Besides, what about gay people who are celibate? What about lesbians?

Where do you stand on people who aren't having gay-man-bum-sex but are in a committed same-gender relationship?

i guess i'm closest to the russian position on this, no need for criminalisation of their acts because its a waste of time and money but strict controls on what can be promoted in public, no marches, no legal recognition of "relationships"

Yeah, we already know you don't want gay people to have the same rights as you. It's called 'being a bigot'. You basically want what you want and everybody else has to behave how you want them to behave. You're not much for treating decent human beings equally as decent human beings. You want to live in a world where you and your kind have the rule over anybody who isn't like you and your kind. And that fact thrills you and doesn't cause any consternation in you whatsoever that I have just described that you want to live in a fascist 'utopia'.

nobody has called for violence against them so im not sure what that has to do with anything.

Oh, sure, reducing large swathes of the population to second-class status doesn't cause twisted perceptions that they have less value than 'normal' human beings, like you and your kind, and are, therefore, routinely abused and discriminated against because they are, after all, second-class citizens, the 'ones we don't want to treat equally' as you and your kind believe.

this is some pussy charleston guilt by association reasoning

Let me guess, you're one of those nut-jobs who EVEN IN THE FACE OF EXPLICIT RACIST MANIFESTO, want to spin it that your idol only killed those black people because . . . drum-roll please . . .they were Christian! It was a hate-crime against Xtians, wasn't it, nothing to do with racism or anything like that. The confederacy wasn't about hating the blacks and wanting to continue treating them like animals, like property, noooooo, the confederates were simply 'Rebels' right?

The fact they were 'rebelling' against abolition of slavery is irrelevant. To you. It's all about how mother-fucking cool they were for being so god-damn rebellious!

Totally *not* about racism.


it is the handful of mentally deranged sodomites and their jewish and liberal western supporters who are the problem, spending their time doing everything they can to destroy the traditional values that made our civilisation great in the first place

You know what makes a civilization great? Being civilized. Treating human beings as equals. That is civilized.

You're just so full of bile and hatred you can't see the love and joy which comes from families who are supportive and nurturing and accepting of others who are supportive and nurturing. No, all you want to do is fill your world full of people you can hate, so you can hate them so hard and fill that empty void inside yourself.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
June 30, 2015, 06:05:58 AM
#57
Oh, Bryant, you are a tool, an ignorant and toxic little tool.

I don't think that right now I require a character certificate from you or any of your faggot friends. When I need one, I'll definitely contact you. Thanks.

That is a false association. But it doesn't surprise me in the least to see you post it.

Brainwashed idiots such as you would like to ignore the obvious connection between pedophilia and homosexuality, but the stats speak for themselves.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
June 30, 2015, 05:43:47 AM
#56
The majority of fundamentalist Xtians oppose gay-rights, yes.
but the majority of people who are opposed to it are not christians

i'm sure there's a wikipedia entry for whatever logical fallacy you're employing here, someone get beliathon

Quote
Let me ask you a quick question, why are you so fixated on sodomy? Do gay men force bakers and public officials to watch them have their gay-bum-sex?

Besides, what about gay people who are celibate? What about lesbians?

Where do you stand on people who aren't having gay-man-bum-sex but are in a committed same-gender relationship?

i guess i'm closest to the russian position on this, no need for criminalisation of their acts because its a waste of time and money but strict controls on what can be promoted in public, no marches, no legal recognition of "relationships"

Quote
'nobody would give them a second thought' - except, of course, for the fact that in countries where violent homophobia is rife the, predominantly male, supposedly heterosexual, majority tend to spend an inordinate amount of time fixating on who 'might' be gay so they can. . .kill them.

Your views ferment violence and hatred all the while you're claiming you 'just want them out of your sight'. It is people like you who are the problem, you are toxic and possess an irrational fear of people who want to have a relationship you do not 'approve' of.
nobody has called for violence against them so im not sure what that has to do with anything. don't expect me to renounce my belief because some people in africa or arabia who share that belief happen to be violent, this is some pussy charleston guilt by association reasoning

it is the handful of mentally deranged sodomites and their jewish and liberal western supporters who are the problem, spending their time doing everything they can to destroy the traditional values that made our civilisation great in the first place
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 05:00:43 AM
#55
But you're missing the point.
the point was that those who disapprove of sodomy were "mostly christian"

The majority of fundamentalist Xtians oppose gay-rights, yes.
Quote from: bigot.saddampbuh
Quote
Nobody with a healthy and functional neurology gives a flying one that you and your hateful bigotry are 'offended' by same-gender relationships, because your response to the situation is borne of toxic dysfunction within your sociofamilial environment. There is no rational justification for you to be so full of hate for gay people. None. Same-gender relationships have absolutely no bearing on your own personal life, so you have no right to demand that others change theirs to suit you.

Nobody has the right to demand to never be offended.
its not a question of taking offence but of those - the majority of the world's people, as i've shown you -  who don't want anything to do with sodomy, being forced to recognise faggot's "relationships" , bake cakes for them, marry them in public registry offices, put them up in hotels, have their kids educated by them

Let me ask you a quick question, why are you so fixated on sodomy? Do gay men force bakers and public officials to watch them have their gay-bum-sex?

Besides, what about gay people who are celibate? What about lesbians?

Where do you stand on people who aren't having gay-man-bum-sex but are in a committed same-gender relationship?



Quote from: bigot.saddampbuh
if they would carry out their perversion in the privacy of their own homes nobody would give them a second thought we have a situation where the entitlements of the sodomite minority are infringing on the rights of the non mentally ill majority

'nobody would give them a second thought' - except, of course, for the fact that in countries where violent homophobia is rife the, predominantly male, supposedly heterosexual, majority tend to spend an inordinate amount of time fixating on who 'might' be gay so they can. . .kill them.

Your views ferment violence and hatred all the while you're claiming you 'just want them out of your sight'. It is people like you who are the problem, you are toxic and possess an irrational fear of people who want to have a relationship you do not 'approve' of.

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
June 30, 2015, 04:47:16 AM
#54
But you're missing the point.
the point was that those who disapprove of sodomy were "mostly christian"

Quote
Nobody with a healthy and functional neurology gives a flying one that you and your hateful bigotry are 'offended' by same-gender relationships, because your response to the situation is borne of toxic dysfunction within your sociofamilial environment. There is no rational justification for you to be so full of hate for gay people. None. Same-gender relationships have absolutely no bearing on your own personal life, so you have no right to demand that others change theirs to suit you.

Nobody has the right to demand to never be offended.
its not a question of taking offence but of those - the majority of the world's people, as i've shown you -  who don't want anything to do with sodomy, being forced to recognise faggot's "relationships" , bake cakes for them, marry them in public registry offices, put them up in hotels, have their kids educated by them

if they would carry out their perversion in the privacy of their own homes nobody would give them a second thought we have a situation where the entitlements of the sodomite minority are infringing on the rights of the non mentally ill majority
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 04:41:15 AM
#53
Backwards, ignorant and superstitious countries are the 'majority' you speak of. Forward-thinking modern countries are generally populated by people who understand that they have no right to oppose two adult choosing to have a relationship, irrespective of their gender.

So in your opinion, Backwards, ignorant and superstitious means anyone who is opposing perversities such as sodomy, pedophilia and beastiality. And Forward-thinking and modern means everyone who are supporting this behavior. I will remain as backwards, ignorant and superstitious. Many thanks for your opinion.

Oh, Bryant, you are a tool, an ignorant and toxic little tool.

Please explain why you are choosing to associate adults who have sex with each other in ways you are too immature to ignore as being none of your business and the abuse of children and/or animals.

That is a false association. But it doesn't surprise me in the least to see you post it. You are, after all, a demonstrable idiot. That's not an ad-hominem, by the way, you clearly have demonstrated repeatedly in this thread and others that you lack many basic reasoning skills.

legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
June 30, 2015, 04:37:13 AM
#52
So you claim that homosexuality is 'opposed' by the majority of people on the planet and then when asked for a citation you post stats that show the kind of people you're referring to as being against homosexuality. Backwards, ignorant and superstitious countries are the 'majority' you speak of. Forward-thinking modern countries are generally populated by people who understand that they have no right to oppose two adult choosing to have a relationship, irrespective of their gender.
the majority of people on the planet includes everyone, if i had meant the majority of people in north america, western europe and a handful of others with a strong jewish media influence, i would have wrote that

But you're missing the point. Nobody with a healthy and functional neurology gives a flying one that you and your hateful bigotry are 'offended' by same-gender relationships, because your response to the situation is borne of toxic dysfunction within your sociofamilial environment. There is no rational justification for you to be so full of hate for gay people. None. Same-gender relationships have absolutely no bearing on your own personal life, so you have no right to demand that others change theirs to suit you.

Nobody has the right to demand to never be offended.

legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
June 30, 2015, 04:34:40 AM
#51
Backwards, ignorant and superstitious countries are the 'majority' you speak of. Forward-thinking modern countries are generally populated by people who understand that they have no right to oppose two adult choosing to have a relationship, irrespective of their gender.

So in your opinion, Backwards, ignorant and superstitious means anyone who is opposing perversities such as sodomy, pedophilia and beastiality. And Forward-thinking and modern means everyone who are supporting this behavior. I will remain as backwards, ignorant and superstitious. Many thanks for your opinion.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
June 30, 2015, 04:30:45 AM
#50
So you claim that homosexuality is 'opposed' by the majority of people on the planet and then when asked for a citation you post stats that show the kind of people you're referring to as being against homosexuality. Backwards, ignorant and superstitious countries are the 'majority' you speak of. Forward-thinking modern countries are generally populated by people who understand that they have no right to oppose two adult choosing to have a relationship, irrespective of their gender.
the majority of people on the planet includes everyone, if i had meant the majority of people in north america, western europe and a handful of others with a strong jewish media influence, i would have wrote that
Pages:
Jump to: