Pages:
Author

Topic: Shorena - To -ve reped and removed from default trust - page 3. (Read 1760 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.
Shorena advertised a scam even after it was discovered to be a scam, but you didnt even even tag him with a neutral Huh?
is it because of his trust rating? are you intimidated?
Yes, I am intimidated by Shorena. He is a mighty fighting keyboard warrior /s
Can you stop joking, this is a serious matter, you give me negative trust for doing the same  thing shorena did but you didnt even drop a neutral on shorena's page, on a serious level, why not put a rating on his page?

OP so your point is that because you promote an obvious scam then shorena should receive negative trust and be removed from DT?

Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.
Shorena advertised a scam even after it was discovered to be a scam, but you didnt even even tag him with a neutral Huh?
is it because of his trust rating? are you intimidated?

What scam exactly did shorena promote?
this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicebitcoin-investment-dice-scam-774120
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475
OP so your point is that because you promote an obvious scam then shorena should receive negative trust and be removed from DT?

Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.
Shorena advertised a scam even after it was discovered to be a scam, but you didnt even even tag him with a neutral Huh?
is it because of his trust rating? are you intimidated?

What scam exactly did shorena promote?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.
Shorena advertised a scam even after it was discovered to be a scam, but you didnt even even tag him with a neutral Huh?
is it because of his trust rating? are you intimidated?
Yes, I am intimidated by Shorena. He is a mighty fighting keyboard warrior /s
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.
Shorena advertised a scam even after it was discovered to be a scam, but you didnt even even tag him with a neutral Huh?
is it because of his trust rating? are you intimidated?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Have you considered removing the signature to the ponzi?

By advertising what is clearly a scam, you are potentially causing others to get scammed which makes you untrustworthy.

edit: congrats to Shorena for having one of these threads opened by a scammer about him
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Shorena gave me negative trust for advertising a "ponzi" "knowingly" , who gave him the power to decide on wether or not people should have a bad reputation around here, where was God Shorena when that cloudmining website signature thing was happening? no-where , you know why? because if he tackled that campaign, he knew he was punching above his weight, so when doublebot pops up, he thinks its his chance,
I dont understand this person's way of thinking, he did virtually the same thing about a year ago but people on default trust are too scared to tag him
these are his points in why he is allowed to advertise a scam but other members arent allowed to because of their unworthiness (shorena thinks he is god)

I will post my arguments here.

I had coins invested with dicebitco.in and was able to completly divest and withdraw. people gamble on doublebot everyday, no-one had had any issues
Manl and Gerry paid out everyone (to my knowledge) that lost coins. everyone is getting paid at double bot
Those that have not been paid out are those that won coins. I think that is acceptable as they have more than they had before the incident and thus did not lose anything. While you can argue that the rolls are deterministic the gamblers are not, thus it makes no sense to argue in hindsight if and what they players would have risked would the nounces not have been skipped.
OH, they were scammed, but not scammed enough?


I agreed to wear their signature for a months and I will honor my agreement.
so will I

I can see that you and other DT members have "double standards"

Pages:
Jump to: