It was an unfortunate event that i was able to join an ICO campaign that was really not good in terms of their management. They are requiring to do the bounty hunters a KYC process as to help them identify the real bounty hunters. Well that is good though and i am confident that i am able to comply in the KYC process. However, a couple of months pass the team requires the bounty hunters to contribute with 0.1 eth and that time I was about to think why when in fact they will do KYC? So i think there is something fishy out there in their ICO and i quit joining bounty campaigns. I posted more than 200 post for them but sad to say my efforts had gone to nothing. I am afraid now to join ICO bounty campaign. Should i quit? Well anyway i found SONDER and this time i am sure that i have joined a good ICO having a live sales which sold million of tokens in their private sales. No question with the success we are almost reaching the soft cap and i am planning also to invest with them as the team told us that our contribution as eth increases so does our tokens. WOw i am really impressed with these ICO. The team are working hard and i am happy and great to be with these team. I finally found the one.
requiring hunters to participate mandatory, is way absurd.
the fact that being a hunter is helping a project more successful is enough. and requiring hunters to participate is unacceptable.
even with KYC, is one thing im against too. one of my understanding with crypto is having the anonimousity on transaction.
and with disregarded the privacy of hunters just to provide KYC is also not complying to being anonymous.
but its really up to you if you will insist and also contribute. i understand how hard sometimes to participate on bounty hunting
but i guess you should move on and find a better campaign that suits you
