Yes, if there's an man that's supposed to have the leading role of two enterprises, one or both of these roles can not be fulfilled completely. In my view, if you're the chief of a company, then holding the lead role in a foundation means you can't do a great job at both of them. That is a big problem.
The bitcoin universe is still pretty dang small bro, you should be happy that there are people who are willing to spend time and effort to help you make money. If all the business guys resign from the foundation, who will step up to spearhead such things? Programmers? I don't think so.
If you look at the FSF, Richard Stallman is super dedicated to his cause, to the extent that he for a while slept under his desk when not programming or doing work for the FSF. He travels all over the world and talks about Free Software. He's not a business person, but he sure has made a name for himself and most geeks now about the FSF, and appreciate what they do. Stallmann is genuine and believes in what he does.
The same kind of person we would need for the Bitcoin Foundation, not a person that's only interested in business. Bitcoin is still small, but not smaller than that any bitcoin business of a certain size can warrant having at least one person working full time at that project. To my understand, for example blockchain.info has one person working full time on it. In a foundation, I'm sure an Executive Director would have his hands full every day if he so choose. Having a demanding full time job outside the Foundation means he is not able to do a great job for the Foundation.
