Should Peter Vessenes resign as the Executive Director for Bitcoin Foundation ? - page 9.

darkmule

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1005

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 16, 2013, 05:25:11 PM

tl;dr : Luke-jr (and some part sepa) made the call for the network to return to 0.7.xx fork, not Gavin or the BF.

So, basically, the idea was adopted simply because it was good, and not because of some imputed authority of its proponent?

That's actually a good thing.

I think the concept of this thread may be mistaken. The question isn't really whether some guy should resign from some foundation, but whether we should even be making decisions based on the opinion of some foundation. Really, who cares what BCF thinks? Am I the only person practically unaware of the activities of this entity?

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: darkmule on April 16, 2013, 03:28:45 PM

Quote from: bg002h on April 16, 2013, 12:02:51 PM

I suggest a sister poll: I can vote because I'm a Foundation member: y/n

The only time it made a decision of importance that I noticed, it was actually a reasonably good decision (on the fork). If they had come to a staggeringly idiotic decision, I think most of the miners would have just ignored it.

Actually, you can read the #bitcoin-dev logs and see that the decision/suggestion to have miners go back to the 0.7.XX fork was actually made by luke-jr (and in some part sepa who backed his thinking). Gavin's first (and I think only call) was for "the longest chain wins" ... i.e. at that point that would have meant remaining on 0.8 fork and the chaos that would have ensued.

tl;dr : Luke-jr (and some part sepa) made the call for the network to return to 0.7.xx fork, not Gavin or the BF.

virtualmaster

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Anybody can regulate bitcoin but nobody should control it.
Buy bitcoins when they are cheap and sell them when they are expensive and they will be regulated.
The US government may also buy bitcoins how much they wish and so they could regulate it. Of course other governments may trade also with it. Bitcoins are for all.
If with regulation is meant control over the blockchain then this is undesirable. Any other control over the bitcoin transactions or exchanges or mining pools is also undesirable.
I think he should explain more precisely what he was meaning with regulation.

darkmule

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1005

Quote from: bg002h on April 16, 2013, 12:02:51 PM

I suggest a sister poll: I can vote because I'm a Foundation member: y/n

That makes sense. Personally, I didn't vote in the poll because I don't give a fuck. I don't give a fuck about the Bitcoin Foundation, either. I've managed to use BTC over a year without knowing or caring about the membership of this entity. The only time it made a decision of importance that I noticed, it was actually a reasonably good decision (on the fork). If they had come to a staggeringly idiotic decision, I think most of the miners would have just ignored it.

Raize

donator

Activity: 1419

Merit: 1015

We don't need a Bitcoin Foundation. We need a Bitcoin PAC.

Early adopters used Bitcoin for the liberty it provides. Freedom from government oversight, bureaucracy, and often outright theft.

If the government has a problem with Bitcoin, it's the government that should change, and those who claim to speak for the community should be advocating as such.

I don't care what they regulate on the fiat end, but Bitcoin is ours.

DeeSome

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on April 16, 2013, 04:00:24 AM

Governments cant regulate mathematics, which is the basis of bitcoin. Its like trying to regulate gravity.

Try flying a hot air balloon over the White House. Grin

bg002h

donator

Activity: 1464

Merit: 1047

I outlived my lifetime membership:)

I suggest a sister poll: I can vote because I'm a Foundation member: y/n

WikileaksDude

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: Herodes on April 16, 2013, 03:49:45 AM

Quote from: mjosephs on April 16, 2013, 03:42:09 AM

Speaking of which, it's too bad we don't have a project leader with the kind of balls Linus has.

I remember Gavin Andresen setting dollar bills on fire in an early interview. Apart from that, he's the epitome of political correctness. (Just waiting for Gavin to pop in with his two cents - as he has a magical ability to spot whenever his name is mentioned on the forum. Wink

)

This.

mobodick

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: caveden on April 16, 2013, 04:22:03 AM

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on April 16, 2013, 04:00:24 AM

Governments cant regulate mathematics, which is the basis of bitcoin. Its like trying to regulate gravity.

They can't "regulate gravity" but they can pretty much forbid you to skydive for example.

We should not be so arrogant. Governments can be dangerous to Bitcoin.

Any structure of power can be dangerous, even bitcoin can be dangerous.
So this is far from a simple decision.

On the one hand we cannot trust individuals or organsisations to act in the best interest of everybody, on the other hand we have to fix that with overarching control structures which also can act in their own interest.
The trick is, i think, to decide in a democratic way what we expect of a thing like bitcoin and have that protected in some way.
For now, i'm not sure there is a consensus about what bitcoin is to society so it's going to be very difficult to even start thinking about how to regulate it in a non-destructive way.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Herodes on April 16, 2013, 05:23:00 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on April 16, 2013, 05:20:16 AM

Quote from: casascius on April 16, 2013, 12:31:31 AM

How do we know that's what he really believes?

This is part of the problem. We don't.

And from what I have seen, I haven't been impressed.

We need someone more visible, articulate, and more of a leader.

He's already admitted he's open to someone else taking over the directorship of the foundation. That's not a good start.

What about the BitPay guy, still a bitcoin business person, but the presentations I've seen from him are of very high quality:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1702464

Galippi would be perfect.

IIOII

legendary

Activity: 1153

Merit: 1012

Quote from: tionil on April 16, 2013, 07:48:53 AM

Bitcoin foundation should resign from Bitcoin.

This.

There are other ways to pay Gavin.

Bitcoin does not need lobbying and marketing crap from the TBF. TBF only serves as a entrance gate for regulation and centralization.

Vessenes should fix his crappy exchange and otherwise STFU, 'cause he hasn't been elected to speak for the BTC community.

QuantumQrack

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

If there is some sort of internal regulation right in the Bitcoin protocol, or anything similar, I won't upgrade to the new protocol. Bitcoin needs no regulation. Bitcoin is the currency of Economic Freedom.

w1R903

full member

Activity: 218

Merit: 100

Quote from: Herodes on April 16, 2013, 07:19:02 AM

For the record: A dilettante is a person who enjoys the arts or someone who engages in a field as an amateur out of casual interest rather than as a profession.

No. In popular speech, "dilettante" refers to someone who flits from field to field, never acquiring anything more than superficial knowledge of a given subject. It's typically used pejoratively. A "dilettante" originally referred to an admirer of the arts, but hasn't been used in that manner since the 18th century.

If you have any doubt as to how the word is used in today's world, google the phrase "he's a dilettante" (with quotes) and see what comes up.

tionil

full member

Activity: 234

Merit: 100

Bitcoin foundation should resign from Bitcoin.

johnyj

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1012

Beyond Imagination

“Right now you have a bunch of anarchistic market dilettantes who don’t understand how markets work and don’t understand the perils of markets,” he said. “People who understand markets need to get involved.”

The most important is to understand the recent crash, is it purely based on psychology/market behavior or manipulated by some large players? I think the latter is more likely, since they start the DDOS at the same time as mass sell off

For a small exchange and such low market capital, it is very easy to manipulate

Severian

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: caveden on April 16, 2013, 04:22:03 AM

Governments can be dangerous to Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is far more dangerous to the powers that be than they are to Bitcoin.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: Herodes on April 16, 2013, 07:19:02 AM

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 16, 2013, 06:33:11 AM

But for the rest of us "market anarchists dillentantes", we are free to ignore Vesseness's pleas to subjugation.

For the record: A dilettante is a person who enjoys the arts or someone who engages in a field as an amateur out of casual interest rather than as a profession.

Like a lawyer or business analyst who dabbles in cryptography .... but probably wants someone else to secure his bitcoins might be a good example I imagine?

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 16, 2013, 06:33:11 AM

But for the rest of us "market anarchists dillentantes", we are free to ignore Vesseness's pleas to subjugation.

For the record: A dilettante is a person who enjoys the arts or someone who engages in a field as an amateur out of casual interest rather than as a profession.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: darkmule on April 16, 2013, 02:04:08 AM

What power does the BCF have that prevents everyone from just ignoring it?

They pay the wages of the lead dev. Gavin Andresen, so in that sense they have some "power" I suppose.

But for the rest of us "market anarchist dilletantes", we are free to ignore Vesseness's pleas to subjugation.

I'm interested to see what Jon Matonis has to say, AFAIK he is still on the board of the BF, and has been stridently anti-regulation and damning of those who invite it in the past.

Maybe Vesseness is just running his yap off and speaking out of turn in an attempt to calm the troubled bitcoin waters, like some kind of messiah figure or something?

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cypherdoc on April 16, 2013, 05:20:16 AM

Quote from: casascius on April 16, 2013, 12:31:31 AM

How do we know that's what he really believes?

This is part of the problem. We don't.

And from what I have seen, I haven't been impressed.

We need someone more visible, articulate, and more of a leader.

He's already admitted he's open to someone else taking over the directorship of the foundation. That's not a good start.

What about the BitPay guy, still a bitcoin business person, but the presentations I've seen from him are of very high quality:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1702464

Topic: Should Peter Vessenes resign as the Executive Director for Bitcoin Foundation ? - page 9. (Read 24387 times)