do they provide an objective and correct assessment? I doubt it. you can see or read information for each ico on icobench, but only the information to be research again.
Topic: Should we believe the ICObench? - page 2. (Read 1917 times)
I think don't completely based on ICO rating websites, there are many metrics where you can follow them on other different channels in order to get updates about the project. Already we are seeing many companies we have to compare with good companies.
Nope, I don't believe with any ICO Rating site anymore. Many of ICO Rating site just give us fake rating and review, I'm sure this ICO Rating Site already paid with the ICO project to make their Rating looks "Good & Recommended" to us...
it's better if we research and analyze the ICO project itself...
it's better if we research and analyze the ICO project itself...
Nobody can be trusted, especially now when only one out of twenty projects is successful. Count only on yourself. Read, think, analyze. So there will be much less risk.
in my opinion, it is very useful to assess the trust that has been made with a team if you have handled a good project frequently and this is an opportunity for bounty seekers to always be passionate about finding and working on it.
ICO bench is helpful when it comes to deciding on whether it is good to invest on a particular project or not but commonly this site could give subjective criticism base on their perspective but you could also give it a chance for you to inform yourself and to have a better option on investments and trading in the future.
no we should not . there are other alternatives out there that you can search and use . we shouldnt also depend on the reviews online but we should rather check the details and overview by ourself because reviews nowadays can be easily fake out and cannot be trusted at all . ico's are also risky even if you say that your analysis by them is accurate because there is still a good chance that they will experience issues or other valid reasons that their project cant be continue , resulting for you too loose your invested capital .
so if i were you, why cant you just stick to the cryptos ? as they are already proven and tested for decades
so if i were you, why cant you just stick to the cryptos ? as they are already proven and tested for decades
Yes, I agree with you, sir. Remember that crime can also occur because of opportunities. So we should remain vigilant. It has been discussed in certain threads that icobench also accused cheated to get a profit in scoring. Either from the icobench team or from the expert rating.
no we should not . there are other alternatives out there that you can search and use . we shouldnt also depend on the reviews online but we should rather check the details and overview by ourself because reviews nowadays can be easily fake out and cannot be trusted at all . ico's are also risky even if you say that your analysis by them is accurate because there is still a good chance that they will experience issues or other valid reasons that their project cant be continue , resulting for you too loose your invested capital .
so if i were you, why cant you just stick to the cryptos ? as they are already proven and tested for decades
so if i were you, why cant you just stick to the cryptos ? as they are already proven and tested for decades
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
Icobech is one of the Best ico rating sites and to some extent I believe in them. However, you will be find by try to visit other icorating sites in other to find out what the expert are saying about any projects you are trying to review. If you cannot do more research remember your funds is what is at stake if you invest.How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
if I myself follow the first project seen from the concept and the team, if icobench is for assessment only if I think there is no influence for the project
Icobench is more trustable than others ratings site.I trust ico bench from that site I already found some good ico.Still now I follow them.I think it's helpful for find good ico.
Don't believe even this ICO rating site too. If you know the ideas find the projects really trust worthy why you need these kind of rating site's help.
Please be careful on checking the team information on the Google results most of the people will not look into these things if you find the no copyright content means you will be able to check the white paper invest them. Other project just ignore.
I believe in ico rating pages like icobench or icomarks. At least, they have more expertise than me in terms of technology. Of course, not all projects that have positive perceptions will have success. But the value of the reference from them is worth cherishing.
They where doing good job one side sharing the many projects which is reliable and doing great job in the market. In that meanwhile I am looking to something is these sites are listing the sites without the payment from the ICO project or simply doing it.
If they really making money on listing it I really confused how we can believe the site as the legit one.
I believe in ico rating pages like icobench or icomarks. At least, they have more expertise than me in terms of technology. Of course, not all projects that have positive perceptions will have success. But the value of the reference from them is worth cherishing.
ICObench's scores as a reference i think is feasible. If you want to study an ICO, i consider that comparing a few scoring websites is a good method. If there is tricky inside, it can be seen..
This rating resource is one of my favorites. For a long time I have been watching the projects that they add and almost always these are really worthwhile projects. But, of course, you can not base your opinion on recommendations alone. You need to analyze each Ico yourself.
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
These sites for ICO reviews have one problem - paid listing. If you need experts on reviews, you as a site which provides ratings usually have to pay them also. Will you trust yourself or them? The phrase "do you own research" is important, unfortunately many people is lazy to spend time on own research How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
Yes you can but the right decision to take depends on you because most projects do not really worth the ratings they get but after you check for the rating and also take time to patiently carryout your own research or the project, you will know the best decision to take on it.
I, as a person who deals with crypto-currencies relatively recently - this rating agency is just an auxiliary tool. I do not trust the ratings of these people very much.
ICOBench rating is good indicator of how good the project is but it is only indicator.
You must get your hands dirty and do research yourself...
You must get your hands dirty and do research yourself...
if you are a beginner in the ICO project then what you do is look for references on google and icobench is often found first. a web that discusses ico rating like this is needed but not the main benchmark for me, I will do a comparison with other good web ratings like icorating and more. the most important thing is to hone your own sensitivity towards ico ico so as not to be easily fooled by ico scam
ICO rating sites are lies. The only site that I trust is ICOdrops and the rest are just there to get paid by the ICOs who want to attract more foolish investors. How come all of them are very close to the perfect score? Where's the unbiased judgment in that?
Jump to: