Topic: Should we believe the ICObench? - page 6. (Read 1917 times)
I think that this resource is not profitable to deceive. These sites are important to their reputation.
Now there are a lot of different ICOS and that means it's harder to choose a cool project. I believe that many different sources of information should be used to make a decision. But I'm sure one hundred percent you can't make a choice using just one rating or expert opinion. I use this site.
my choice to invest into the project or not - is only my own decision. and the evaluation of the project does not play any role for me, while choosing the project. first i learn a lot about the project and i do not trust to such resourses. everyone should have his own opinion and decide himself.
Considering the opinion of others and the success of underrated projects on ICOBench vs. the high-rated ones, I believe you should just study manually the team backgrounds experiences, if its legit or not, high credibility or inexperienced, and for the project, is the idea geniunly unique, or with real world use cases, or with business solutions other than their technical concepts and ideas, and many other aspects of a project.
well it was quite accurate. any ico rating didn't give rate without some judgment in every aspect. they sure help us to qualify some bounty
I do believe in ICObench but giving a hundred percent will not be a good idea.
you can check others also.
make sure to make your own study and research as always.
that is the basic tool in crypto currency especially in ICO
you can check others also.
make sure to make your own study and research as always.
that is the basic tool in crypto currency especially in ICO
There has recently been a topic with evidence that Advisory on icobench bought , I think you should not trust him!
ICO bench could also be a way trusting ICOs but never put your 100% trust on people to hp you make your research, try to Do It Yourself (DIY)
we should and i thonk that you need to be sure in ylur decisions and i believe that worh the great icos the great future is ahead of us Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
why jot of course we should truat ico? just we need to be careful and to choose wisely in order not tobe fooled by scammers How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
ICO bench could also be a way trusting ICOs but never put your 100% trust on people to hp you make your research, try to Do It Yourself (DIY)
in my opinion don't trust ico reviews too much like icobench, because the average ico reviews website is paid, so of course they will give positive reviews because it's paid
The worst thing you can do in this space is follow investment advice by platforms. Those platforms most times gets paid to make the reviews you see and always try to do your own research and analysis before venturing into any investment.
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
No. I used this resource at the beginning of my way in crypto and trusted them but finally I noticed that their rating is almost unuseful, bad project which even isn't able to close their softcap has a big rating, but some good projects have low rating. I think ICOs buy their rating and investors don't believe ratings from this resource.
I think that you shouldn't rely on any ICO rating websites, it is much better to analyze the projects yourself. As for ICObench, I heard the story about selling the reviews from "experts", so I don't trust this website.
I often focus on ICO Bench when choosing a project in which I can participate.
But I think that this rating is relative. They cannot say the exact data there.
But I think that this rating is relative. They cannot say the exact data there.
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
For me, icobench is only one of the many references to determining a good project, but it is not a determinant to make a decision. Many projects initially had a high rating on icobench, but eventually became a scam project How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
I need to say that now I'm not thinking about believing this resource or not. It seems to me that any rating resource has a property to be sold, because in the world, crypto currency is quite possible.
I believe that such a site should only be used to collect information about the project before investing, but not to see how they evaluated this project and what its rating is.
i think they are good in rating icos. i have checked and did some research about bad icos and good icos. so when i compare the score of those icos in icobench then i was able to clearly see the difference. so because of that we can believe in icobench website
Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?
There are a lot of people that believe on the ratings of icos on the ico websites and they use that as the basis for making their decision on which ico to invest in but i wouldn't do that. Reason being that icos are run by people and people can be bought with money to say good things about a project even if the project is not good to get more people to invest in it.
Jump to: