Topic: Should we believe the ICObench? - page 5. (Read 1917 times)
You can use ICOBench as references and trust it only at 60%. Because the score can tell anything, high score wouldn't make an ICO success.
I'll take a look project that listed on ICObench, it's a ICO ratings website, but I won't trust it because I believed that it's just a pay per review and expert rating, another reason is rating score is not important for a project to become success, do your own ICO project research is important than that score
I don't think the ICOBENCH rating makes any sense.
Because ICOBENCH's rating is so poor, good projects may have a low score, whereas shit projects may have a high score.
Because ICOBENCH's rating is so poor, good projects may have a low score, whereas shit projects may have a high score.
With the assessment of an ICO project in ICObench, it has little influence on the project, because surely investors will see and rate themselves there even though not 100% trust ICObench ratings but are very helpful in assessing before investing.
I did not believe in icobench anymore because I was involved in a project that was rated 4.4 * but when this project started showing signs of fraud, icobench immediately deleted it from the rating page. I can not believe they would do it instead of giving that project a "Scam"
ICObench is a free ICO rating platform and a blockchain community supported by a wide range of experts that provides analytical, legal, and technical insights to the investors. ICObench highly recommends visitors to conduct independent analysis or turn to professional services for making any investment decisions. All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions.
I think that it is not good to trust ICObench or other rating off ICO. Project menlo.one also promise make research and report about good and scam project, but it is better to make your own research.
There is no alternative to ICObench and other ratings of the ICO. While such projects as Menlo.one not offered and do not realize better way, it is good to use at least this tool and make your own research.
I read a lot of negative about the ICO ratings. Frankly, I do not trust the ratings, I try to study the project myself or under the guidance of my friend.
Of course no. You should not believe ICO Bench, but you can try to find some people on ICO Bench who have good knowledge and intuition. So you can track the projects which were rated by this people.
I never only use ICObench data for my investment plan. ICObench can help easily find more information about project. Beside data from there i always try to do my own research. Do not forget that some projects give bonus for ratings, sometimes ratings can be not verified. Do your own verification.
I do use ICO bench exclusively as my ICO ranker. I honestly have no idea how to pick ICO's. The ones that sound good to me suck and the ones that sound stupid rocket. I have given up and use a profession service now. It's working out much nicer.
I really believe ICObench, but a hundred percent it is not a good idea.
you can also check others.
be sure to do your own research and exploration as always.
this is the main tool in crypto currency, especially in ICO
you can also check others.
be sure to do your own research and exploration as always.
this is the main tool in crypto currency, especially in ICO
Many projects buy rating on known, untwisted sites. I would not trust these sites completely, but I'd better study the project and the road map myself.
I read it somewhere that some ICO rating sites offer premium listings I don't know the details what's with the premium listing and free listing but we should not trust all of the scorers we don't fully know the reviewers or they are just fake accounts, ICObench is good to look or consider but don't stop with scorers you should also look for other resources to determine legitimate and hidden gems ICO's.
Many projects buy rating on known, untwisted sites. I would not trust these sites completely, but I'd better study the project and the road map myself.
I think ICObench is just a table for get an idea about upcoming projects. But it is not advice to only depend on the ICObench website score. You have to do own research about the project before investing and ICObench will help you to do this. In my side, when i make an investment, the first thing that i check is ICObench score.
I use ICO bench as a check. I do not rely on it solely for my decision making but it is a detail I look at. Most of the time simply reading the high level plot of the project gives a lot of insight as to whether or not its complete garbage or not. The ICO Bench mixed with a little common sense seems to be working for me.
ICO bench could also be a way trusting ICOs but never put your 100% trust on people to hp you make your research, try to Do It Yourself (DIY)
Do it yourself you mean try to launch your own ICO lol
Nice adviceOn topic - I don't believe these ICO ratings, I don't know how they calculate them. And I don't know who is behind this action. Also I don't see any statistics of profitability on any of this sites
So I use them just as secondary tool - if I see a good project, I am starting my research
We can trust ICOBench. But also your opinion about what you should have and study the product. Since I have heard a lot that rating can be bought. But this is considered the most expensive rating, and you can trust it a little. If the project has an idea and they are confident that their product will be in the future, they buy and hope that they will be trusted.
ICO-ratings can not be trusted only if you consider yourself an expert who is able to independently evaluate the project. If you do not have such knowledge, it is better to listen to the opinions of others. Now there is a huge number of ratings, so having looked at some of them, you should have your vision for the program.
There are a lot of good analysts in Icobench, but there are those who sell their votes. So when I'm looking for a project on the Icobench, it's important for me that there would be at least 10-15 votes for the project.
Jump to: