Perhaps its already mentioned before, but in my opinion would be there is no chance for bounty hunter to get paid if the project is failed.
I believe the team doesn't has that kind of allocation to give compensation if the project doesn't reach the desired target.
Topic: Should we compensate bounty hunters when ICOs fail? - page 3. (Read 998 times)
Compensation is indeed a good thing for those who suffer losses and lose time because the project failed. I think this can also be a good solution, but it is also very difficult to implement. Because the project failed, of course, everyone didn't get tokens.
If you have worked long enough so at least there is compensation for the bounty hunter so that they can enjoy the results. However, it also may either Fund from which to pay their work is certainly no one knows. at least if there is any compensation will be able to create a bounty hunter could be alleviated through the result is not the maximum.
I think it's debate able, in one side the bounty hunter already done their work, but in the other side, there is some rules or perhaps unwritten rules that the project will be paying the bounty participant when certain amount of fund are collected, and by joining the campaign that means the bounty participant already agreeing that rules.
Seeing as how many bounty hunters do the least amount of work possible when promoting an ICO, of course they should not be compensated. Using bounty hunters to promote ICOs is about one of the stupidest possible ways somebody can get publicity, seeing as how most of them
- write garbage forum posts
- have fake Facebook friends or fake Twitter followers
- copy and paste the homepage of an ICO and call it a "blog"
- game the system to get as many tokens as possible.
Then if the token should by the grace of God actually be worth something, they just dump all of their rewards on the market as soon as possible, crushing the chances of success of the project.
Bounty hunters are the dumpster divers of the crypto world. They sift through digital trash and call it a living instead of actually contributing anything to society. The sooner ICOs realize this and stop using them (or at least begin to put some quality control on them), the better.
- write garbage forum posts
- have fake Facebook friends or fake Twitter followers
- copy and paste the homepage of an ICO and call it a "blog"
- game the system to get as many tokens as possible.
Then if the token should by the grace of God actually be worth something, they just dump all of their rewards on the market as soon as possible, crushing the chances of success of the project.
Bounty hunters are the dumpster divers of the crypto world. They sift through digital trash and call it a living instead of actually contributing anything to society. The sooner ICOs realize this and stop using them (or at least begin to put some quality control on them), the better.
when ico really fails and investor funds are returned, then for the bounty campaign there will be no compensation because ico is canceled and no funds are collected, because bounty campaign should be a good and good marketing strategy and can make ico successful but it turns out that the ico failed and can't even touch the softcap so the bounty can be canceled.
how will they compensate bounty hunter? do you think if team wants to spend their money on bounty hunter 
of course not, so don't expect anything if ico fails
of course not, so don't expect anything if ico fails
If there is any means to compensate bounty hunters after failed projects it would be very good. Almost all the bounties I participated last year turned out to be unsuccessful and it was a great lost on my part. All my resources I wasted on those unsuccessful projects went waste
I think that bounty hunters do not such a difficult job that they would be entitled to compensation. The most important thing to compensate all investments to investors is the key to the development of the industry.
I think it is part of bounty hunting to actually promote the project. So a failure of the project to meets its fundraising targets bounty hunters are made to feel the impact. However bounty hunters are human and deserve some sort of reward for the work that has been done
Of course, all ICOs must be able to compensate investors or Bounty participants if the ICO fails. It is not easy to work at the ICO because it takes a long time for ICO to complete it. But this compensation happened and it was very fair. But we as bounty hunters or investors must be more careful in carrying out ICO elections.
sure is a funny thing about this condition. If it can't reach their sales from where it will get the money to pay for the bounty hunter. certainly the team or bounty manager reluctant to pull out a huge cost to pay because even they don't get revenue. Indeed the hope for bounty hunter is paid for, but certainly, if there is certainly that is the team or manager that is generous.
I think it's fair because a bounty person does his job and many people approach her very ostensibly offended when he is deceived
but how can pay bounty participant if the icos project are failed to the target in the market, and yes i understand bounty hunter is sacrifice
their time and effort to promote the project.
but he/she can get their bounty token or coin came from the failed project the question here when the tokens or ocins listing into the market become profitable.
The effort put ij by bounty hunters are not always easy and i do not even expecy that bounty hunters be treated with disdain, just like some would do and decide not to even pay despite the project's success.
Only the team maybe because they will not do anything to success their ICO.
Only the team maybe because they will not do anything to success their ICO.
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN MEAN YOU GODDAMN IGNORAMUS REPORTED FOR SPAM
Don't use 'we' as if you are the bounty manager or developer of those ICOs. But basically, I'd say yes so those bounty hunters will be paid depending on how they worked and how much effort they exerted just to promote the project. There are other factors that must be considered, you just can't be sure of the project to become shady later on. The manager should always be meticulous on choosing what project to manage so his participants will be safe and prioritized.
Try to imagine. If your project fails, do you want to compensate hundreds of bounty participants in your project?
When your project failed, that means your coin/token will not have a value at all. And I think, the bounty participant won't accept your token.
Nah. If you are the project owner or as well as bounty manager, you are not required to compensate bounty participants when your project fail.
When your project failed, that means your coin/token will not have a value at all. And I think, the bounty participant won't accept your token.
Nah. If you are the project owner or as well as bounty manager, you are not required to compensate bounty participants when your project fail.
@mods: please ban every newbie account that posted in this spam thread.
It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?
Where are they going to get the money when they failed to reach funds, let's admit it, they want to raise funds for their project not for bounty hunters, because bounty hunters will be paid with their token and the funds they collected are going to be paid for their developers and applications that they are developing.
Jump to: