In my opinion this is a good thing and I think this rule will make the outcome for each campaign participant even better,
Topic: Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 7. (Read 1560 times)
That is not a good idea to limit the members because that thing will be decided by the company and the manager. If they limit the participants then they won't get much awareness about the ICO progress. So limiting the members is a bad idea and it is allowing other new members to promote the campaign.
Should we limit the members of a campaign because I think that if we do a lot of things, it will make our managers rush to check posts and they will spend a lot of time on more management
I think you should limit the number of jr.member, member .... so it will attract more participants and come to the campaign the more qualified members, so the marketing of the coin will better.
Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
It's good to hear and if this will happen many people will benefited because limiting the number of participants in a campaigns increases the bounty rewards earned of the bounty hunters.
Yes, and i think it should be properly implemented in every campaign so that every participants can earn a big amount of money for their hardwork and dedeication to the projects the paticipated.
Dear everybody,
Very very thanks for your mention and sharing,
There are very very many great ideas both agree and disagree. All of them are very useful for everybody who attention to bounty campaign.
On advertising, As many participants as possible. It’s always right. But I think we should mention to advertisement quality so we need more and more good articles/posts/tweets, not the spams.
Dear everyone, please continue share your thinking!!!!
Thank you...
Very very thanks for your mention and sharing,
There are very very many great ideas both agree and disagree. All of them are very useful for everybody who attention to bounty campaign.
On advertising, As many participants as possible. It’s always right. But I think we should mention to advertisement quality so we need more and more good articles/posts/tweets, not the spams.
Dear everyone, please continue share your thinking!!!!
Thank you...
The market is a battleground for every little space for the promotion of the projects. Everyone wants their own space under the sun so offering something is more efficient than limiting someone or something. You can choose anything you want though. There are so many interesting projects out there with good bonuses where you can participate.
I definitely agree to you everyone wants to work here.... So if we limit the members in one project it is just likewe are limiting the chances to make that project successful... As what you said it is better to create a lots of bounty programs than limiting the members who wants to participate.... Everyone has a freedom to be here even we are just a begginer or a professional one.... We are all hoping that cryto currency will really change us.... Always think that the more participants involved in one bounty project the better because there are a lots of people who will promote it....
The outlet is a field enacting every immature elbow-room enacting the advance of the projects.
I believe that you need to do limit the number of participants bounty campaigns, unless of course you want to respect the interests of bountyhunters. Also you can close entry to new participants after collecting softcap.
In my point of view I guess it would be a good idea to limt memebers in one campaign, because the profit for each of them would rise, and I think that make min rank of members for some companies would be also good idea (in that case if they need a high quality of memebers)
Of course we should. There are a lot of advantages of this action. For example the quality of work would rise and amount of gained money would be more than enough for members
its not good for a project to limit his participant in bounty campaign... this is marketing strategy broadcasting your project to the public would means a lot of people to participate in order to broaden the market scope.. other project use television to reach out to the general public... here in ICO they are using us to publish their project in order to attack many crypto people to invest in their project.
Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
Your idea is right maybe ypu saw it as a solution to avoid spamming... Maybe if they have a little opportunity recieved in bounty project surely they will seek better to have a quality post... But if we do that we are just controlling them to improve... All of us is not perfect so we must give them an opportunity to learn from their experience... Because we believe that everyone deserve to be here... If they learned about cryptocurrency surely they will help themselves to develop... At least we are just here to guide them...
if in my opinion by limiting the number of participants who join can be a good alternative
Promoting is the key aspect of every project. They need to get more people involved and I do not see anything bad in it - projects need to start from somewhere. Look at this one - it's promising and interesting and deserves more people to watch to it.
I think the limits are needed for the followers in a campaign so that it is not too crowded and the distribution of payments is not small
In the practician's view, few people mean higher earn, so they always want limit members.
But from the other side, more members mean better promotion, so almost project teams don't limit member in their bounty campaigns.
But from the other side, more members mean better promotion, so almost project teams don't limit member in their bounty campaigns.
I agree with this topic, we should be limit members of a campaign.
Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
There should definitely be a limit to the participants in a campaign, however it is very unlikely that the developers of that ico will want that, it is just common sense, the developers want as many promoters as they can get for their coin and if they limited the number of the participants that will limit the exposure of the project and that is something they do not want.Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
Jump to: