Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 9.

Farahtenan

member

Activity: 420

Merit: 10

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience on this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow is my thinking:
There are some projects attract so many participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has the limited bonus. The result, bonus that each participant receives from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depending on the bonus value of that campaign)
What is your thinking?
Please share…

I think the same thing. Because I think it is very necessary to limit participants to all campaigns. If the campaign limits the participants and the allocation is not too large. Of course, we get not too small and in accordance with what we do. This is also to avoid the number of participants who spam. As more and more participants are also spam. So it should be limited.

Disclaimert

newbie

Activity: 266

Merit: 0

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

there are of course some bounty projects that limit the number of bounty participants for their campaigns, for example, the number of signature campaign participants is limited to 300 participants, to 1000 social media participants and so on. it aims to limit the scammers.

Cemplakaleght

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Yes I agree with your opinion, should all the gifts be limited to the participants, so we bounty the hunters so eager in the search for the gift.
And also with limited participants, so we can know to calculate our allocations.
Many big projects,
participants a lot but we got a little gift.
Or change the rules such as bounty signature system, the rank is also in use

Onestepinhell

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Good Morning

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Well, many companies now began to limit the number of participants in social networks companies, so everything depends on the company, and in the company's principle, how many of the companies advertise it the more the better. So that from this point of view, there will be no restrictions.

mbah

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 251

When restrictions on the number of participants in the campaign could make a project running smoothly then it doesn't matter. spam is very troubling indeed all people and if these restrictions are imposed is also not a problem. of course, if the participant is limited then the allocation results acceptable to be slightly larger.

OnnoTunes

newbie

Activity: 280

Merit: 0

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I don't agree with limiting people. Everyone has equal chance to participate in bounties. It's a marketing event for the projects, so more the people more the advertisement.

Michail.

jr. member

Activity: 205

Merit: 1

Some managers already limit the number of participants, as on the Bountyhive platform, but the payments are still very small ...

kreket1

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 11

I believe that it is definitely worthwhile to introduce a limit in social campaigns. Soon we will generally work for free. Theme by a little dies.

PetrovichCoinMaster

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 17

Founders want to get a better result for a fixed amount of money. Therefore, it is hardly possible to see strict restrictions on the number of participants in social campaigns.

If viewed from the bounty party, the ideal variant is up to 1000 participants in social campaigns and up to 200 in signatures.

tenebriscaelum

member

Activity: 462

Merit: 11

Instead of limiting the number of participants in a campaign why not just add more requirements for the participants. The ranking, friends and followers of members sometimes are just not enough. What bounties need is members that can provide quality postings and/or topics. Pre selecting members depending on skill set can be a way to lessen the members that cannot do the job weekly and it will provide a good marketing to the ICO.

AlekseyCrypto

member

Activity: 518

Merit: 11

I definitely support your idea to limit the number of participants in the bounty. But managers need to raise funds for the project and they will not do it.

baghdatis1990

member

Activity: 504

Merit: 14

Miracle Tele

Regarding this topic, I think a limitation of participants to a campaign is an advantage for active and already enrolled participants, because weekly stakes will increase for them so they will be more significant. But to promote the project does not. The more enrolled, the more you will know about that project. Therefore, I think they will not put all the projects in the future, limiting the participants, because it is not for their advantage.

Germantopov1

newbie

Activity: 196

Merit: 0

On the one hand it sounds good to limit members to rise the bonus for them but on the other hand i think we should not limit them so everyone would have an opportunity to have experience such as this

andriiklim

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

In my opinion you need to limit amount of members, who will be faster that will get more coins, because if a lot of members then you'll get very little.

Mahanton

hero member

Activity: 2730

Merit: 632

Quote from: St4yInTh3D4rk on April 27, 2018, 05:29:41 AM

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Actually we means the forum members right,we can't do anything in these case because the project needs as much as promotions to become more successful so they never limits the participants whatsoever,if you want high bonus from campaign join on the campaign with less participants or in the signature campaigns where the spots are very limited.

It can be classified since there are campaign which do pay on bitcoin and on altcoin which is on bounty campaign. If the company would decide to pay tokens then limitation isnt possible and as you said they would really need exposure as big as possible for their token or project.This is why we commonly see there are lots of participants into a campaign but this would be totally on projects budget.

sigtmerchant

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 11

First of all, no "we" can limit or decide anything in a campaign that doesn't belong to them, their only decision may be whether to participate or not.
Having said that, I do notice too that bounties are becoming smaller to the point when they become ridiculously small and aren't worth any effort.

rextoinsem

newbie

Activity: 210

Merit: 0

Of course, they should be limited, but it is not profitable for any of the managers, because the more people, the more powerful the marketing company is. And the fact that the participants of the bounty program can't have it nobody cares.

Ayston

newbie

Activity: 203

Merit: 0

Twitter and Facebook or social media should be at least limit their joiners since most of the hunter only join this category and signature is lesser... Hahaha but it's up to the manager also since the team will decide it themselves.

hovrah

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptocurrencyguru on April 28, 2018, 09:29:44 AM

Bounty Campaigns is creative promotion and knowledge sharing there would be restrictions for campaign restriction of the number of members count

some Bounty companies have a limitation on the number of participants. But some manager also sets the conditions for limiting the rankings of bitcointalk accounts.

cryptocurrencyguru

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 11

Bounty Campaigns is creative promotion and knowledge sharing there would be restrictions for campaign restriction of the number of members count

Topic: Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 9. (Read 1560 times)