Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 8.

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

There should definitely be a limit to the participants in a campaign, however it is very unlikely that the developers of that ico will want that, it is just common sense, the developers want as many promoters as they can get for their coin and if they limited the number of the participants that will limit the exposure of the project and that is something they do not want.

coingrowth

member

Activity: 416

Merit: 21

Limiting members will create more demand for campaigns hence we may miss quality of posts so it is better to give opportunity for every one

kreket1

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 11

I think that it is necessary to introduce limits for the campaign of social networks. Spam will not give much for the project, but many hunters will simply lose interest in these projects

Spaffin

full member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 108

I do not see the need to impose any restrictions on the number of participants in the ICO generosity campaign. If someone worries that he will get little payment, he may not participate in this ICO campaign and choose another. They are now held very much and quite often only a few dozen people are involved, if we consider the campaign signature. Recently, this forum has introduced and so many restrictions, and above all the restrictions associated with the introduction of the system of merit.

Vektrum

member

Activity: 420

Merit: 14

I am categorically against the introduction of any new restrictions. This forum should always give the right of choice. You now have the right to choose to participate in any ICO project or not to participate. If there are restrictions on the number of participants in the generosity campaign, there will be no such choice. On the other hand, the ICO team is not interested in this limitation. On the participants of the generosity campaign, they allocate a certain percentage of their new tokens and they are interested, on the contrary, in a large number of participants who will advertise and promote their project.

The limit on the number of participants in the generosity campaign and even the number of participants of the same rank is introduced by ICO in case of payment of generosity in bitcoin or ethereum, or linked to the dollar or euro.

Rhosadah

copper member

Activity: 383

Merit: 100

limiting the number of participants that many gift managers have done, restricting the social media community to the lack of project promotion, can affect the achievement of ico itself,
so again all managers' decisions can determine because the token allocation for the prize remains the same

seymenyunus16

newbie

Activity: 196

Merit: 0

This type of conversation has been held many times before also on this forum and some bounty managers have restricted the number of participants in a single campaigns based on the past work as they dont want any scams.This means the less the members greater will be rewards for the selected members.Now most of the people also avoid ICO with greater number of participants as they think it can be scam but its all in the hand of bounty manager.

biznes35

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 253

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I think it's worth limiting the number of participants in bounty companies, since you get really cheap pays. Assume up to 500 people at least.

laracrofth

full member

Activity: 373

Merit: 100

DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO

Limiting participants will be a good thing for the bounty hunters, but not good for ico, as they need to forecast the number of participants who will survive till the end of the bounty campaign which means more work for the team.

cryptowonders@20

newbie

Activity: 142

Merit: 0

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

normally in some project they always have limited numbers of participant, so once that exert number is reached they don't longer accept participant again.
but for that not withstanding they have to limit numbers of participant in a single campaign so we that can gain enough token, i know some managers can not do because they want there project to hit as possible to the market which people are spreading on so many platforms.

tolgahanuzun

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

Yes, it seems to me that in order to bounty companies live on, it is necessary to limit the number of participants in them. Otherwise, in the future, the quality of such bounties will be simply awful. Money and time will be lost both by participants and organizers of the bounty.

choychoy

jr. member

Activity: 238

Merit: 2

ADAB-First crypto exchange Islamic Crypto exchange

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Most bounty don't limit their participants as they want a bigger community and also if you find many participants on that ico, a sign that it's a good bounty. Yes it should be limited to 2k participants only but we have no choice as those developers wants many participants for advantage to them. As bounty hunters we should not join once we find out that it's already crowded to respect those early participants.

Todychopper77

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

yes must limit, the result of the sale is not necessarily exhausted, a project must be really compact in taking decisions in limiting members

A.SanchezNo7

newbie

Activity: 252

Merit: 0

Dear all,
Thank you all of you for sharing idea in this topic.

radokan

member

Activity: 291

Merit: 15

Quote from: Siriska on April 30, 2018, 01:39:06 PM

I think that the number of participants in 1000 people in social companies will be sufficient. In the subscription companies will be optimal for 200 people. Why recruit 10 000 people with a reward of $ 5? it's funny

Because it is all about advertisement and visibility. Almost no one cares what participants will post, what matters to them is signature visibility and to get as many participants they can.
In my opinion, participants should be smarter and when they see there are already lots people in these bounties they should look for another bounty, but that is just me.

Siriska

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

https://www.soar.earth/

I think that the number of participants in 1000 people in social companies will be sufficient. In the subscription companies will be optimal for 200 people. Why recruit 10 000 people with a reward of $ 5? it's funny

Luizrosevelt

jr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 3

I think your concerns are well shared. The marketing/bounty is primarily an effort to get attention and attract prospects that could hopefully pick interest in the project and invest. It is a no brainer that good projects attract more bounty participants, but the outcome can be managed by the campaign managers through various ways. For instance, this is obtainable in bounty0x, a cap is allocated and counts down from the start till the cap is exhausted. This makes it more targeted if each campaign plan out and know exactly to what extent they want the marketing. I have seen bounty campaigns with a very low cap lasting 15 weeks and participants getting average of 20$ to 60$ after 15 weeks (poor).

A.SanchezNo7

newbie

Activity: 252

Merit: 0

Quote from: djlenna12345 on April 30, 2018, 05:08:29 AM

Have you seen the table of bounty programs of the TokenSuite team? There are no restrictions and they are packed with a huge number of bots and scams, duplicating data with incorrect purse addresses. This command fills the table very well, but they need to limit the number of participants.

Yes, I have seen. but i hope there are not too many participants in a campaign.

keyscore44

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1016

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

It depends cause for guys which are joining campaign it is worst when it has a lot of participants but for guys which are making campaign it is better thanks to bigger spam and bigger ad of their project.

djlenna12345

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

https://www.soar.earth/

Have you seen the table of bounty programs of the TokenSuite team? There are no restrictions and they are packed with a huge number of bots and scams, duplicating data with incorrect purse addresses. This command fills the table very well, but they need to limit the number of participants.

Topic: Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 8. (Read 1560 times)