Hello Stars, that would mean we would have to shift the bets and not fill up the bets
I don't understand those words, but the crux of the matter seems to be that you skipped some winning nonces such that some winning bets turned into losses.
In Stars' case, that left him with a positive profit, but not as positive as it should have been, so initially you were going to give him nothing (since he didn't "lose") but now you're wanting to make it right.
So let's look at a simple case. Suppose I was already 100 BTC in profit, and placed a single bet of 1 BTC at 10x, and that it would have won, but the nonce was skipped, making it lose.
Instead of being 100 BTC in profit like I was before the bet, I ended up 99 BTC in profit.
If the bet had won like it should have, I would have been paid 10 BTC (my 1 BTC stake back, and 9 BTC profit) and so my new total profit would have been 109 BTC.
The difference between my actual profit (99 BTC) and my deserved profit (109 BTC) is 10 BTC - that's my stake (1 BTC) times the bet's payout multiplier (10x).
To make things right, you would need to pay me 10 BTC.
You seem to be arguing that just paying me the skipped profit is enough. But it isn't. I would want the stake back too, since you kept it when you shouldn't have.
Stars - does that sum up your case?
DB - do you disagree?
(I think you may be misunderstanding each other - hopefully this post helps clear it up)