Pages:
Author

Topic: Signature campaign post quota - page 2. (Read 882 times)

legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 4420
May 20, 2023, 03:11:11 PM
#71
Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

I find myself struggling at times to get 25 posts in a week actually. I try not to post in mega threads minus the NBA betting and season threads in gambling discussion boards and that's because I actually watch basketball and feel I know what I'm talking about. I talk ab out mega threads as I do not see enough new threads each week that interest me, I see a lot of people post only in mega threads to hit post quotas. I'm motivated to post but I don't want to continue to post in the same threads over and over like I see a lot of people doing.

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1022
Hello Leo! You can still win.
May 19, 2023, 01:45:47 PM
#70
I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin
Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.
You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent. Cheesy

Solosanz you got me laughing and almost rolling on the floor. Your sentimental analysis is correct and what is happening in the stake campaign and maybe some other campaigns. In as much as money is involved, there must be variation and habitual posting which is influenced by the weekly pay that is gotten from the campaign.

Darker45, you are correct. Stake has a minimum post of 25 per week but the pay is not within the range of what a hero member or a legendary member receives per week. This is why many of them are posting upto 80 per week and above in order to hit $100 and this definitely leads to spam.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 571
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 19, 2023, 10:09:01 AM
#69
What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.
If I will see that I have to push myself too much to reach required quota and that I'm posting just for quantity, then yes, probably I will get out of campaign.

Wow, you're too honest for telling us that I cannot blame you if you think that quality comes first before quantity, honestly, there is no exact campaign post quota, you can be in a campaign with 20 posts but you have the time and you have the motivation to posts because you love being in a discussion, in a debate or you want to contribute in a discussion, the most important thing is if you are going to post 3 or 10 posts daily it should not be spam its still quality that counts because its the one that will define you.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1330
Slava Ukraini!
May 18, 2023, 05:00:35 PM
#68
I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin
Oh no Cheesy In my early days here I've been innsimilar type of campaign like Stake - Yobit. IIRC, they allowed to make up to 20 posts per day. Don't remember how many posts per week I was making, but my record was 12 posts in one day and it already was too much for me.
And to be correct, Stake doesn't requires 100 posts per week, they just allow to make up to 100 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.
If I will see that I have to push myself too much to reach required quota and that I'm posting just for quantity, then yes, probably I will get out of campaign.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 571
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 18, 2023, 07:48:28 AM
#67
Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 624
May 18, 2023, 02:37:50 AM
#66
Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting.
This is the key idea behind our signature campaign. When we spoke to the campaign manager, he literally insisted that this was the only approach that could bring results. After all, the posts of people who enjoy discussions are the most organic, as a result, the most readable. There are still users in our campaign who post just for the sake of the quota, but the manager assured us that after a few weeks these users will leave the campaign if no progress is seen.

Actually, this is the main idea of our dialogue with the manager.

"The signature campaign is similar to "product placement" in the sense that advertising is shown under the member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without an explicit indication. It's completely voluntary and even if it's not direct clicks it definitely subconsciously settles in the minds".

That's nice; every manager always knows what's best for the client, and as such, they will do their best to provide quality service for their clients. This method, I also believe, increases user participation as they will want their worth to be known on the forum. By doing so, they will not just focus on creating a bunch of comments or threads with zero value and meaning, but will want to make every post unique and pleasant to readers. If this method has been working very well for you, then it's the best. I must confess my post quality today, and as of when I was still new to the forum and started participating in campaigns, I tried to engage on posts that I found interesting and not just some random threads that I knew nothing about just in the name of completing my post count for the week.
hero member
Activity: 2618
Merit: 613
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 17, 2023, 06:50:11 PM
#65
What do you think the right post quota per week?


I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.

I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.



Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates



There is no hard and fast rule that how many minimum posts a person should make in a week. The campaign manager can set any number of posts and usually, we see this number somewhere between 15 posts to 25 posts. However, anyone is free to make any number of posts greater than the minimum amount required by the campaigns as long as the posts are not spam and there is no post bursting etc

It is always advisable to post a few posts above the minimum requirement, as even if some of your posts are not counted or deleted, you still have enough posts to qualify for the weekly payment.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
May 17, 2023, 06:24:16 PM
#64
I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin
Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.
You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent. Cheesy
Actually agree on this sentiment or comment on which this is indeed reality. People would always be having something to say which its not really that shocking. The only thing on which
people couldnt thrown up some negative words is into those people who had earned most merit. We know that no matter how short or 1-liner reply they would be having as long they do have that tons of
received merit then it wont really be making some issue or would be generating out those common words to be thrown up on a certain user.

This is where you could really see that there's some different treatment or impression. About post quotas then it would be entirely be depending on the campaign manager in the end of the day.
They are the ones who would be setting up those rules and terms in regarding on the campaign. Even he's just a community manager, he would really be having the full rights on how
he would really be handling it out, usually post numbers will be ranging 15-25 post per week and this is that common max post count
but there are actually who doesnt have a limit which users would be spamming out as much as they can.
copper member
Activity: 173
Merit: 285
Your Bitcoin Mixer
May 17, 2023, 08:54:56 AM
#63
Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting.
This is the key idea behind our signature campaign. When we spoke to the campaign manager, he literally insisted that this was the only approach that could bring results. After all, the posts of people who enjoy discussions are the most organic, as a result, the most readable. There are still users in our campaign who post just for the sake of the quota, but the manager assured us that after a few weeks these users will leave the campaign if no progress is seen.

Actually, this is the main idea of our dialogue with the manager.

"The signature campaign is similar to "product placement" in the sense that advertising is shown under the member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without an explicit indication. It's completely voluntary and even if it's not direct clicks it definitely subconsciously settles in the minds".
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 556
May 17, 2023, 12:43:57 AM
#62
I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin
Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.
You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1854
🙏🏼Padayon...🙏
May 16, 2023, 09:18:28 PM
#61
Quote
Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1022
Hello Leo! You can still win.
May 16, 2023, 06:43:35 PM
#60
My current campaign have optimal post quota - 15. I can reach it easily without forcing myself to post in order just to get paid. I usually make about 20 posts per week, sometimes up to 25. But sometimes when I have busy week, reaching even 20 posts would be difficult.
Why I'm posting above required quota? Because I just don't count my posts, signature campaign don't change my posting habbits. Just on last day of week I check how many oosts I have made to be sure that have enough to get paid.
I am just knowing that there is another campaign that has optimal post quota of 15 posts per week apart from Roobet. Honestly 15 posts is the fairest deal anyone can get in the forum. There are many people who makes more than 15posts each day even without being signature quota conscious.
You do not belong in this conversation because your quota not only small, but you also have a manager who doesn't stress his participants @Hhampuz.  He is my first employer in this forum and he is so cool and experienced in the business

Quote
Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1330
Slava Ukraini!
May 16, 2023, 04:48:11 PM
#59
My current campaign have optimal post quota - 15. I can reach it easily without forcing myself to post in order just to get paid. I usually make about 20 posts per week, sometimes up to 25. But sometimes when I have busy week, reaching even 20 posts would be difficult.
Why I'm posting above required quota? Because I just don't count my posts, signature campaign don't change my posting habbits. Just on last day of week I check how many oosts I have made to be sure that have enough to get paid. Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 593
When life gets hard BUY Bitcoin!
May 13, 2023, 08:21:31 PM
#58


Filling the weekly quota with OK quality post is not bad in my opinion. Correction me on this one if I’m wrong.
You think it's OK to barely get by in life, or would you rather live a good life? Posting on this forum is the same IMO. If you are just an OK poster and never really strive to be a great quality writer/poster, you will likely never be able to command a custom deal for a casino and will always have to worry that you'll be kicked from a campaign. Why would you want to be in fear every week?

The meaning of my OK quality is an acceptable or constructive. I'm describing a scenario which a user post prioritized quality and not not quantity since the pay rate is per post. I might use the OK quality wrong here but that's actually what I'm trying to imply on my post.

A user posting within the range with good quality compared to user that posting bunch of shit post above the max post count. This the case that I'm thinking but I'm not sure if that's the real case on my example.

Anyway, I agree with that campaign participants should do their best every week since they are being paid. This should be customary for every signature campaign participants when they are enrolled on the campaign.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 871
Rollbit.com ⚔️Crypto Futures
May 13, 2023, 04:53:08 PM
#57
What do you think the right post quota per week?
Perfect quota doesn't  exist, find something that works for you, btw some campaigns are flexible enough such that they pay based on each post!

I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
It's not a forcing matter when post quota comes naturally and btw every manager has their own style of running a campaign and its their way of running things by choosing
participants that can give extra ..and sadly their rules  won't bend to what you want.

I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.

Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates
If you are going to post on the forum to meet your quota requirements then clearly this shows that you are on the forum to get paid and nothing else! Try be part of the forum and post naturally!!!
legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 4420
May 13, 2023, 01:56:14 PM
#56


Filling the weekly quota with OK quality post is not bad in my opinion. Correction me on this one if I’m wrong.
You think it's OK to barely get by in life, or would you rather live a good life? Posting on this forum is the same IMO. If you are just an OK poster and never really strive to be a great quality writer/poster, you will likely never be able to command a custom deal for a casino and will always have to worry that you'll be kicked from a campaign. Why would you want to be in fear every week?
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 593
When life gets hard BUY Bitcoin!
May 13, 2023, 01:18:59 PM
#55
With the current competition for the highest paying campaigns I have seen in the Services section people being removed from the campaigns, having written just the 25 posts of the quota or maybe up to couple more, as an indication of little effort.
You mean people got removed because they wrote only the required amount of posts? Thats strange tbh. Imight be wrong here, but my guess is that they getting removed has to do more with their post quality rather than amount of posts written.

I saw a scenario like this before during the time when a lot of Chipmixer campaign participants was vacant. The existing signature campaign forced to reshuffle and now posting within the requirements is being discouraged by some managers.

The post that I quoted below is from the campaign that have a per post rate. I personally post within the margin because 25 post is not my normal post count when I don’t have any campaigns. Forcing user to make above the requirements while the campaign is on per post rate is bit contradicting to each other.

Quote
There are many users who are barely filling up their weekly signature campaign quota. It's obvious you are chasing your numbers when your total post counts are not more than 25, 26, 27 or even 28. We don't need such users in the campaign. If you are not having fun in making posts,

Filling the weekly quota with OK quality post is not bad in my opinion. Correction me on this one if I’m wrong.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
May 13, 2023, 01:05:49 PM
#54
With the current competition for the highest paying campaigns I have seen in the Services section people being removed from the campaigns, having written just the 25 posts of the quota or maybe up to couple more, as an indication of little effort.
You mean people got removed because they wrote only the required amount of posts? Thats strange tbh. I might be wrong here, but my guess is that them getting removed has to do more with their post quality rather than amount of posts written.


The maximum total payout for a campaign has been socialized let's say, but at the same time there is a lot of competition from forum members to access the $100-$150 weekly payout campaigns for Hero/Legendary.
I think that current situation is diametrically opposite, its sellers market and its never been easier (at least not since I started applying for signature campaigns) for a shitposter to get into $100 per week signature campaign.
sr. member
Activity: 2310
Merit: 332
May 13, 2023, 12:34:14 PM
#53

Regardless, I encourage all the projects to run pay-per-post but it's not on me all the time. The same applies to all the other campaign managers too, maybe.

I think there is a positive side to this regards to pay-pay-post system for participants because some week may be different from other week in the life and activities of the poster especially health issues. If a participants is running under campaign with maximum post per week (maybe 25 ) and he or see is not able to complete the post for that week because of being hospitalised and stopping at 20, they get denied of the weekly payment. I think this is a disadvantage of maximum post against a participant.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 2011
May 13, 2023, 03:03:22 AM
#52
Are they willing to pay more for that amount of posts, or they expect to pay the same as those who ask for ~25 posts, which kinda became a forum standard?

With the current competition for the highest paying campaigns I have seen in the Services section people being removed from the campaigns, having written just the 25 posts of the quota or maybe up to couple more, as an indication of little effort. The competition between campaigns has changed since CM is not here, where there was a clear difference between the top 50 paid and the rest. The maximum total payout for a campaign has been socialized let's say, but at the same time there is a lot of competition from forum members to access the $100-$150 weekly payout campaigns for Hero/Legendary.
Pages:
Jump to: