Topic: Signature campaign post quota - page 5. (Read 882 times)
Tbh I don't like the minimum post requirements neither. The campaign I am in only requires me to post 15 posts in a week and that's one of the lowest I've seen out there but years ago, bitmixer.io (to me it was the best ever signature campaign this forum has ever seen) had none of these requirements. If you made 4 posts for example last week, the campaign would pay for your 4 posts... It is a bit frustrating to be having to make posts while you are on vacation you know. It is not that you can take a break from posting. At best you will get a warning for your first offense and then you will get booted if you repeat the same mistake.
What do you think the right post quota per week?
If you're in a campaign you agreed to the campaign manager's rule on the number of posts that you need to reach the maximum you can post in a day that is counted so it's not about what I think it's about what the manager set up so he can maximize the visibility of the project he is managing
Quote
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
I don't see anything wrong with it, being in a campaign is a privilege and the manager picked you because of your posting habit which is posting not for quota but posting because you are posting normally as a forum member not as a paid worker, you should not be looking on numbers but quality.Quote
I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.
If I'm a bounty manager I love to see my participants go the extra mile not because they are forced but because they are committed and they have passion as contributors to this forum.
BTW you are only newbie with only 60 posts, How did you know all these details? When I was in your rank, I could not distinguish between posting in some boards, or even knowing that there were paid signature campaigns in the forum. is this an ALT account?
It is an alt account, he confirmed it himself in this topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitbollo-incorrect-use-of-trust-feedback-5451642
What do you think the right post quota per week?
If you are not satisfied with the rules of the campaign in which you participate, it is better to look for another campaign or to stop using signature campaigns. It is just a bonus and not a daily job that you need to strive to develop your certificates in order to preserve them.BTW you are only newbie with only 60 posts, How did you know all these details? When I was in your rank, I could not distinguish between posting in some boards, or even knowing that there were paid signature campaigns in the forum. is this an ALT account?
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
Post requirements are not compulsory, nor is it mandatory; it's not a force to be on a campaign if you can't cope with their minimum post requirements. Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting. When a campaign's minimum requirement is 25, at the end of the week you are ending with either just 25 posts or about 27 posts, which clearly shows that all the participants are after is the paid post and nothing else. Every manager wants what's best for their clients, and as such, any member they notice is not productive will be removed and replaced with some other active member who can deliver the task.
It is also important to state that joining a campaign is not by force and different campaigns have their requirements so you should choose the one that suits you. Most campaign managers don't just pay attention to post quota but post quality. Some quality posters/members will never be removed from a campaign because they didn't complete their post quota.
In summary, post quotas are important because the campaign manager and the firm have plans and targets. Post quality is more important than just completing post quota. And if you are not comfortable with the rules of a campaign, don't join.
First this is not the right section, this thread is fit in service discussion section.
~
Done~
My concern is not burst posting but minimum post requirements. I don't want to quote managers announcement to pay respect but some of them are requiring user to post above minimum post requirements.
I'm not convincing managers to believe me. I'm trying to determine the exact logic for obligating user to post above minimum requirements.
First this is not the right section, this thread is fit in service discussion section.
This is really a subjective matter and you can't generalize all the campaign manager need to agree with your opinion.
Burst post matter is an example, there are different definition for them:
1. Creating many posts in a short time, this make some users need to wait for a hour to post from his previous post.
2. Creating 10+ posts in a day, only post for 2 days to hit the 25 week posts requirements.
3. Creating post in one thread only, he keep replying with the same user over and over, to avoid multiple posting/post in a row.
Which is right for you? maybe you will say the number 1,I could say number 2, the other will say all of them, etc.
This is really a subjective matter and you can't generalize all the campaign manager need to agree with your opinion.
Burst post matter is an example, there are different definition for them:
1. Creating many posts in a short time, this make some users need to wait for a hour to post from his previous post.
2. Creating 10+ posts in a day, only post for 2 days to hit the 25 week posts requirements.
3. Creating post in one thread only, he keep replying with the same user over and over, to avoid multiple posting/post in a row.
Which is right for you? maybe you will say the number 1,I could say number 2, the other will say all of them, etc.
What do you think the right post quota per week?
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.
Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.
Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates
I mean the quota for sure will depend on the campaign or manager that you join, there are some minimum post requirements on some campaigns since it wouldn't make sense to join a campaign if you would not post at least.
They are the ones who join the campaign so it was surely not forced plus they are getting paid as well, In my observation most of the participants were removed because of the low-quality post, they have the right to remove someone anytime whenever they want to since its already written on the rules so you can't complain about that and as a manager they will do their job to make the campaign at its best by picker the best participants, I see it reasonable for some users getting remove since most of them have a low-quality post, there are a still members that only have a few posts in a week but doesnt get removed because they have a quality post and I guess already a trusted member.
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
Post requirements are not compulsory, nor is it mandatory; it's not a force to be on a campaign if you can't cope with their minimum post requirements. Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting. When a campaign's minimum requirement is 25, at the end of the week you are ending with either just 25 posts or about 27 posts, which clearly shows that all the participants are after is the paid post and nothing else. Every manager wants what's best for their clients, and as such, any member they notice is not productive will be removed and replaced with some other active member who can deliver the task.
I understand the premise of your logic. What I'm asking it does user here normally make 25 post per week without any subscription on signature campaign?
If being natural is what the campaign manager wants. Removing the post quota is the answer.
Can you keep posting above 25 post per week without signature campaign to give joy in the forum?
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
Post requirements are not compulsory, nor is it mandatory; it's not a force to be on a campaign if you can't cope with their minimum post requirements. Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting. When a campaign's minimum requirement is 25, at the end of the week you are ending with either just 25 posts or about 27 posts, which clearly shows that all the participants are after is the paid post and nothing else. Every manager wants what's best for their clients, and as such, any member they notice is not productive will be removed and replaced with some other active member who can deliver the task.
What do you think the right post quota per week?
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.
Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates
I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.
I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.
Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates
Jump to: