Made a cuda port of actual Silentarmy 5
speeds sucks. 92 s/s on overclocked 1070(opencl version give near 100)
Tested only on linux.
If anyone want
https://github.com/krnlx/nheqminertoo bad it dumped :
~/aaa/nheqminer/Linux_cmake/nheqminer_cuda_sa$ ./nheqminer_cuda_sa -l eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -u t1M74VKHZDJnHwmwWiHUiMWkBkzgQW4VGeg -cv 0 -cs -cd 0 -t 0
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
Equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash vSA5 cuda port by maztheman,krnlx
Thanks to Zcash developers for providing base of the code.
Special thanks to tromp, xenoncat, mbevand
and eXtremal-ik7 for providing
optimized CPU, CUDA and AMD equihash solvers.
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
Setting log level to 2
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b99409780] Using SSE2: YES
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b99409780] Using AVX: YES
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b99409780] Using AVX2: NO
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Starting miner
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Connecting to stratum server eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b95868700] miner#0 | Starting thread #0 (CUDA-SILENTARMY) GRID K520 (#0) BLOCKS=56, THREADS=64
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Connected!
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Subscribed to stratum server
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] miner | Extranonce is d65d009971
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Authorized worker t1M74VKHZDJnHwmwWiHUiMWkBkzgQW4VGeg
[15:36:43][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Target set to 004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0e5604189374bc6a7ef9db22d0e5604189374bc6a7
[15:36:44][0x00007f8b96069700] stratum | Received new job #c1bc667ea1f4a9aea140
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
But it's not the fault of your port - it's the same with the plain nheqminer 0.4b and the cuda_tromp solver. maybe again bad luck with the old computing (30) version.
Regards
You need to use different command switch ..but he didn't mentioned which.
I checked also the Windows build but it dooms again at mm_malloc which is again linux only :-( can't we get some interpretational in 2016?
@changesl:
Total 400.6 sol/s [dev0 80.1, dev1 86.4, dev2 79.3, dev3 83.9, dev4 73.6] 2761 shares
Total 401.2 sol/s [dev0 81.3, dev1 85.2, dev2 81.0, dev3 83.8, dev4 74.4] 2761 shares
Total 401.4 sol/s [dev0 80.9, dev1 86.0, dev2 82.0, dev3 82.8, dev4 72.6] 2761 shares
Total 401.8 sol/s [dev0 80.6, dev1 88.0, dev2 80.0, dev3 85.6, dev4 74.1] 2761 shares
Total 402.7 sol/s [dev0 79.4, dev1 88.3, dev2 77.1, dev3 86.0, dev4 73.0] 2762 shares
Total 402.5 sol/s [dev0 79.5, dev1 90.0, dev2 76.4, dev3 85.4, dev4 72.5] 2762 shares
Total 402.0 sol/s [dev0 81.8, dev1 88.9, dev2 75.7, dev3 84.4, dev4 72.5] 2762 shares
Total 400.9 sol/s [dev0 80.2, dev1 89.6, dev2 75.7, dev3 86.4, dev4 76.3] 2762 shares
Total 398.8 sol/s [dev0 77.2, dev1 87.5, dev2 73.6, dev3 86.5, dev4 74.7] 2762 shares
Total 402.1 sol/s [dev0 76.0, dev1 86.6, dev2 73.8, dev3 86.7, dev4 76.6] 2762 shares
Total 403.2 sol/s [dev0 73.9, dev1 85.6, dev2 74.8, dev3 84.5, dev4 78.8] 2762 shares
Total 400.9 sol/s [dev0 74.0, dev1 84.0, dev2 74.4, dev3 80.0, dev4 80.0] 2762 shares
Total 400.4 sol/s [dev0 74.1, dev1 78.0, dev2 74.0, dev3 81.1, dev4 83.4] 2762 shares
$ Devices on platform "NVIDIA CUDA":
ID 0: GeForce GTX 1080
ID 1: GeForce GTX 1070
ID 2: GeForce GTX 1080
ID 3: GeForce GTX 1070
ID 4: GeForce GTX 1080
