Topic: Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting (Read 531 times)

Those who have very huge amount can stake as high as hey want on single cause that's how you really get profits from them, but personally I make my picks with accumulation so I can get up to 10 odds or 5 odds and I stake on it. I don't have the eyes for playing or selecting the right big odds so I don't trespass my area of luck

There is some slight difference on accumulated and single bet, all depends on the amount you are putting in. In single bet you take your time and predict carefully with a reasonable amount, you will have the chances of winning than accumulating. The only way I would advise someone to proceed on accumulating If the amount you are using is not too much. You can start trying your luck with accumulating to raise much money but if you have a good amount, I wouldn’t advise it to accumulate a bit because the risk may be high but sometimes people really win in the accumulation but I don’t see it to be a good idea, when you bet single the chances of winning is more than accumulating.

Teams that are not favored usually have bigger odds. If you bet on them, you will get big profits if they can play surprisingly well, but choosing them is very risky because teams that are not favored usually perform worse than the favorite team. Besides in fact the factor of playing at home does have a slight influence if the team that is not the favorite is usually able to give a surprise in front of its supporters. Because sometimes teams that are not favored teams don't always perform badly, there are times when they perform impressively and it is surprising that betting on them is a little tempting with big odds, but we also need to be careful if we want to bet on a team that is not the favorite.

Yes, it's true that to choose a team like that, we really need to make a single bet, don't make it one with an accumulation bet because it will be very risky, after all, choosing a single bet with the odds they have also provides tempting profits, but you also have to be prepared if your bet loses because of a loss team like them is not surprising knowing that they are not a team that is favored by bettors, but if a team like them wins, their victory is also a painful blow for most bettors who prefer to bet on favorite teams.

If you know that other games has a potential for winnings why not take the risk, i do tons of betting too to earn profit but sometimes i made a single bet if I would like to focus in the game especially with the sports betting and one of my favorite team will play i will do a single bet, but if its a potential game event like in e-sports betting most likely consecutive games queued every game and I see a potential winning ill do groups of bet.

For me, I think it really depends on the set of matches that are available for the day. If there are a lot of games, then maybe go for a parlay so you can hit big with just a small amount of money. If there's few, then maybe go for single betting. Also, gamblers preferences could be a factor.

For me, if you want a high-risk, high-reward type of bet, then go for parlay, as it can give you a lot of profit by betting on multiple games. The downside of this is that if you lose that parlay, your bet is automatically lost, which is kind of frustrating, especially if it is only one game. Single betting, on the other hand, is low-risk but can give you a profit (it really depends on how much you bet). A single bet is more safe because you only have two options: either you lose or you win, a 50-50 chance. Comparing it to a parlay that includes a lot of games, a parlay is more risky than a single bet.

But at the end of the day, it is really up to you. Whatever strategy you use, make sure that it will work for you.

Betting on underdogs as a single bet may even look more risky because such bet comes with big odds and little change of winning. Although sometimes it looks like bookmarks are trying to deceive gamblers with this odds.

Well, I think that when you try to do things better, when it is with a particular game, if the analysis that can be done is detailed, you can study the squads much more in the case that it is football, but when it is multiple games, It is difficult, even if we know a lot about football games, what the players are like, what they do and everything, it is something we must also consider, at this moment things can turn out to be very different, when We think about doing any kind of thing in a casino, with the sports bets estio parlay if it is betting a lot on luck unless you are very monster and things happen in favor of our bets, but I think that it is very duifúcuk I prefer a thousand Sometimes doing things well with a team or a soccer game that with 5 or 6 more, it is difficult to predict the result that they will be favorable, it is something that seems difficult to me, however there are people who like that, when it is sun only sport that is known, even so it is hard.

When other sports are combined , I think that there it is Throwing luck , it is like Entering a casino , because it is very Difficult for things to happen , because in particular I have always said that making sports bets has to do it with great wisdom and sometimes leaving aside feelings and similar events so that they do not influence, but when we see things from another point of view, we can predict that it is possible that things with sports betting are easier to win. To the player who in a normal casino game, like slots, or a machine where4 always give themselves the chance to win under the respective luck, that is why I have always said that when casinos and sports bets are united into one, they are a great combination, this is what we can give as a good Option to do at all times , of Course for me Sports Betting has a lot to do with Knowledge.

I have done that in the past with number of bets as experiment but it doesn't work.

IMO, this is not all about the betting odds, it's about our chances of winning. When you bet on the underdog and you are confident they'll win, then your expectation is high that they will win, unlike with parlay, (at least 2 legged), where even if you are confident you'll win, but you need to win 2 bets for your ticket to be graded as win. We maybe thought that because the odds is low it will win easily, but there's no guarantee on that, otherwise we will be just betting based on odds solely and will not anymore do some analyzing of game.

I have also been a part of this feeling. Underdogs have very big odds against their opponents sometimes as big as 25 to 30 odds are given to them against their opponents probably with 1:70 odds, so it is really tempting not to go for the underdog especially when they have been in shape lately, I do give it a try and I have won some big odds in the past against small and favoured opponents.

There is a better way to bet on big odds and that is to bet it as single. They accumulate them because they are of high risk already, so it is better not to accumulate too much of risk together. Playing the big odds as single, you also have the potential profit to encourage you to go on it as a single game.

Single bet if I bet on underdog, parlay if I bet on favorite.

I do that because when you bet on underdog, the odds is already big if you win. While favorite has low odds and I'm not satisfied when I only earn small profit. Personally I'm more excited to see an underdog pull an upset since if the favorite is win, it's nothing surprising.

That happened for so many sportsbettor that they only need one win with that parlay and that's the twist goes along with them and it sucks when you go through with that.

That's why with single bets, you don't have to think of any other bets but just that bet only that you've casted. There are no catches and if you win, you win and if you lose, you're just going to accept it lightly.

If you have a lot of money and you want to experiment the accumulated bets, it is your choice as long as you're aware of how it's being played on.

It depends on how much you have to risk, but I personally like betting on a single match than more because your chances of coming out with a positive result will be higher, the more games you place bet on, the more you are expose to the chances of loses.

You will always be so close to winning millions when you bet on 5 or 7 games at once, and that's all there is, only very few people got really lucky with multiple matches and all prediction come like they predict, but you don't have to deal with this if you choose a match or two max.

The reason why people choose many matches at once is greed, they want to make all the money in a day, this greed is what locked many peoples luck away from them.

single or accumulated bets depend on one's strategy and abilities. there are those who prefer to bet single and go straight all-in because they are sure that the team they choose in the match will win. but there are those who choose accumulated betting because they are more confident that in some of the matches they bet on there will be some winners. so it depends on the gambler whether they prefer single or accumulated bets, but for me personally i prefer single bets because i don't gamble that often and my money is also limited lol.

Yeah, I think it's better to go for single bets as we go on accumulation, risk goes to the top as well. And it's really very frustrated to see that let's say a parlay bet on your side with a odds of 100x and you are about to hit or just waiting for a game to win. And you think that your chances are high as the last leg of your multiple bet is a favorite.

Unfortunately, bad luck strike you, the so called favorite turns out to lose that game and as a result ruining your multi leg bet.

And so it's better to just bet single, when it win then bet again and try to roll it and see how you can go that far or if you win then stop at least you have make good profits from a single bet rolling it over.

Even without the poll, it's fine and it seems that many are preferring the single bets than accumulated because it doesn't did you that much risk when you do it.

Why having a poll won't make sense? Because whenever I see threads that has poll and there's a voting, there's not that much people that participate on it.

And it's just like you can count on fingers that are participating and voting with such polls but maybe on this topic, I could be wrong and many will vote.

As a fellow sports bettor, will it bring something to you if you learn what's the most preferred by most bettors here?

Or generally, just want to know the pulse of the community regarding how they place a bet in their respective sports betting activity?

Just keep it simple and choose what's the best and most effective based on our preferences. Others are doing great betting in a single bet and others want to try their luck at doing multiple parlay bets for much-boosted odds. If what is effective for us in the long run, then I should say we just keep doing it.

I play both and so, it’s safe for me to say, am always quite confident in the single bets than the accumulation bets. It even gets more disappointing when you lose on an accumulation bet than you would say for the single bets. This is often the case due to the amount of energy one has to put in on making the predictions and in many cases. Most of them do play out until one rogue prediction messes up the whole pick.
Single bets gives you a chance to be at your best on a game but, you’ve got to go huge to make any worth of your prediction. That’s a safe place to play I tell you.
So yeah, it’s easier to choose the single bet if you’ve got the funds for it over the accumulation bet.

Thanks so much for the observation. I think creating a poll alongside with this post can easily make us people's view. I will definitely make a poll with it now and will love it if all that has responded to this post will try to vote in their opinion on this.

I also agree with you, because when you play plinko plaster games, the results are immediate, I think all this has a lot to do with the playing style of each player , you don't have to be very Emphatic to know if People have an ethos of gambling where they have to make accumulated bets, personally I don't like that, the most Accumulated thing I can talk about that sucks is when I make a soccer bet I have to wait for the day to arrive , something like that. That's just what it is for me, but basically when it's a casino things are always very radical, I know people who all the time go to a physical casino if and only if they have slots, because they are very thin on the slots and for They don't mind making bets that involve or involve sitting there for up to 12 hours in a chair, that's something that I really wouldn't have the Patience to do something like that.

When things come to light to make any kind of move in sports betting , I always favor doing things with betting in a very peculiar way , I only bet when I have a very strong decision about a team or about a fight. In particular, because I also like to bet on boxing and any other sport like the UFC, so based on this I am not a big fan of these sports, maybe sometimes that helps me, because I get information from Everywhere , that's what that I like and that is why I am passionate about it, in this order of ideas I will always prefer to do things like this, never bet on betting without knowledge or leaving everything to chance alone, because I consider that I am failing Myself , it is like trading, you can never trade as if it were gambling , because you can be very lucky in a moment, but that can end and bye there is nothing to do , for that reason we must always do things with a lot of responsibility , in all Activities You have to have a lot of Responsibility.

From my perspective, I do not see the point in accumulation. I prefer single bets.

OP probably should have created a poll for this thread. Since there are only two possible answers expected from the community...

From a mathematical perspective, it would seem to be safer to single bet than to accumulate. But it should be up to you, and your own unique betting style. Some people would rather go into a higher risk but higher profit kind of style of gambling. And I must admit that I myself have sometimes tried accumulation bets in the past, just for the hell of it, even knowing there was a higher chance of losing everything. But I think that there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is something that you enjoy and you do not overdo it by betting ridiculous sums of money.