Pages:
Author

Topic: Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting - page 3. (Read 534 times)

hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 814
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>POR
I believe that like some I also prefer the single bet

Of course, i know the risks are lower and you have fewer worries... while in accumulation it is clear that your gains are greater, but there are several other variables that you need to worry about, especially the risks!!
In my opinion, single bets are practical and simple, another point that I also find relevant is that single bets are a great way to increase your profit in general.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 546
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.
All my precious time I spent in playing accumulated games in sports betting, I only won about 5-10 of my games I can't vividly recall the exact number, most of my slips then used to end up with cut one and so annoying, when I started seeing more wins was when I switched to single betting and since then I hardly stake accumulated games but on occasions.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 573
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.
Accumulation is the better one? I will say no that it depends. If you want to gamble with very small amount of money, you can go for accumulate and be expecting loss. If you want to gamble with higher amount but also it should not be high amount of money but small, but in a way bigger than the one you used for accumulation, you should go for single bet. Single bet is better though but not that better than accumulating like 2 to 3 matches, but if the accumulation is getting longer, accumulated bet is not better at all in this regard.
The choice between making a single bet and accumulating bets depends on personal preferences, risk tolerance, and the level of analysis put into the betting strategy. I put accumulating bets on easier predicting games with small odd each. It's like a waste putting single bet on a game with small odd.

Accumulating bets allow you put a bet with a small amount of money. You have the potential to generate higher returns with the same initial investment by accumulating bets. Single bets are straightforward and easier to manage. There is no need to track multiple events simultaneously. With a single bet, you can concentrate your analysis and research on one event, potentially leading to more informed decision-making.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 627
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I typically do single bets. I want to look each alone with the bets that I do and that's why I like it doing one after the other before placing new bets. I agree to the suggestion about if you don't have much money and you just typically want to gamble it, say lose or win, do it on a parlay bet. That's like where your luck is going to be determined and shall see if you've made it or not. Small amount but potential high win. I don't go into parlay honestly but I see friends of mine that are liking it. That's why I am steady on single bets which is definitely I am having fun with and my mind is only one bet to think of.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1071
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.
People who are more likely to play accumulated bets are gamblers who who will use little money to try to win much. They loose a lot to the benefit of the betting platform, and only rarely win.

Single bets with a good amount of money increases a gamblers chance of winning the betting platform.

I personally prefer single bets, and accumulated on rare cases when the games are less than three.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1231
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.
I think it depends on personal option. Because single bet is less riskier compared to multiple. In multiple its just like predicting the impossible. Or you can say that the percentage is %50 50 in single bet. why multiple is %80 20 which is almost impossible to win or more difficult to predict.
Both has its own risk and the amount of possible loss could still be managed by the amount you will be betting. Accumulated bets is harder to win but will give you bigger returns using small capital. With single bets you may lessen the risk of losing due to low odds, but cannot expect big in return if you won't be putting big amount in your bet. On my end, accumulated betting is a better option; risk is higher but you won't have to lose that much unlike with single bet that you will be needing to increase its size to get a desired return amount. If you know the sports you are betting for, then bigger odds would still possible to be reached. It is lower odds which is more fearsome to go all out with.
Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.
Nothing works consistently in gambling. Let's say you won 9/10 matches with single bets and your total earning is $200 from a capital of the same amount on each bet (just an example). Now given that profit won't be big with small odd single bet, the winnings could be erased with one single losing bet. High rolling amount and low rate of return and this is the opposite of accumulated bet wherein you could lose $200 on 9 bets but earning more with a in a parlay bet due to odd multiplier.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 824
Livecasino.io
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.
In my opinion, smaller accumulators are better than big accumulators or vice-verse. I don't do accumulators at all unless they are played at different times so I can place single bets on the exchange but roll the full returns of each bet on to the next. I missed out on one game some weekend ago on accumulations, I was so pained, missed out on a fortune, needed 3 goals in one of the club matches during that game and finished two nil, had a decent cash out offer but thought I'd brave it for once, ended up losing a lot of money.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1094
I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.
Accumulation is the better one? I will say no that it depends. If you want to gamble with very small amount of money, you can go for accumulate and be expecting loss. If you want to gamble with higher amount but also it should not be high amount of money but small, but in a way bigger than the one you used for accumulation, you should go for single bet. Single bet is better though but not that better than accumulating like 2 to 3 matches, but if the accumulation is getting longer, accumulated bet is not better at all in this regard.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 769
They say parlays are for suckers but I still prefer them  Grin
There are different views about Parlay and system bets, but I learn one thing from the experience after staying into chats and other conversations with different punters about this all mostly love to stay with one bet because they feel its good but sometime if we odds issue then they sometime like to have one more but with few peoples those want to become rich quickly and also busted very quickly they prefer Parlay and system bets which have too much risk and many times happen to me as well while we have 5 or 6 teams parlay this busted at the last or second last bet which is more painful, but now I believe going with one bet is much but for fun we can jump into bets with more teams as well.
Speaking about parlays then it wouldnt really be always talking about on the money that you could really be able to get or odds that you could be able to hit but also there are bettors who do really like to see those consecutive win and would be telling to themselves that they had made out the right call but it cant really be denied that when it comes to parlays or multiple bets then those potential winnings which it is really the main reason on why most bettors are really that interested into it which you can really be able to win up some big money out of those peanuts but it will really just that depending on how many games you are really that
setting it on. The higher the number of games the higher potential winning but of course the feeling that it could give when you do bust up that last bet of that parlay could give out that kind of nightmare feeling.  Cheesy

When it comes to choices then it would really be that determining into your funds on which if you could be having those single bet with all in type of bet or having those accumulation
on which it would falls down into someone's preference in the end of the day.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 295
Single bets and accumulated bets are the same because as long as they can place bets according to the money they can afford, they will be fine and still enjoy the gambling game. Placing a bet for both is equally profitable, especially if they place a bet with small money so that they don't lose a lot of money if they lose. Only greed will make them experience large losses in gambling because they will not see that they have to stop gambling before they experience even more losses immediately. If their target is to collect a lot of wins, they can use accumulated bets but must be able to place bets on teams that have the potential to win more to get more winning money.

Single bets and accumulated bets are not the same because one has lower risk and one has high risk, one has potential to give you huge return and one has potential to give you less return. It's more like the lower the risk, the lower the return for single bets while accumulated bets has higher risk with higher return. Single bet can only have high return when the risk is high. In some bookies, you can bets that a particular player will be the one to score the first goal and you will have a single bets with high odd but of course it will have high risk because such might not happen.

If you place bets on accumulated odds, you can make huge money and recover quickly from loss but they are hard to achieve but when you do, you will recover all you have been losing to the bookmakers. Playing a 100 odd games a day with over 2.5 in some matches might be hard but in a month, if you are serious and very good at predictions, you can make that in atleast twice in a month and after calculations, you might lose 28x and win 200x, subtract that from your profit and loss, you will have 72x profits. This is only possible if you know what you are doing.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 713
Don't joke with my Daughter
Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1162
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.

I can lose 5 times in a row, and win on sixth and I am still in profit, which is why it's so great. Plus when the odds are that low, you think that it's like rare that you would win, but that's usually on favourites. You could have teams that have 1.20 to win, that is almost like a sure thing, but bundle 10 of them together and you have a great return on your bet, so it's really a fun thing to bet on, and I like doing that.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 205
The great city of God 🔥
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.
I think it depends on personal option. Because single bet is less riskier compared to multiple. In multiple its just like predicting the impossible. Or you can say that the percentage is %50 50 in single bet. why multiple is %80 20 which is almost impossible to win or more difficult to predict.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1304
I place both types of bets, it all depends on the odds and the matches

In the past I bet only on single bets, when I tried multiples I only lost, so I focused on single bets, but after studying some championships better, I found good opportunities and a great championship to bet on multiples.
I'm getting good results this way, so it always depends on the situation

I practically only bet on soccer/football, and the league I've found the best opportunities for multiples so far has been the Portuguese championship, on the others it's 99% single bets

Does anyone here also have a favorite league or championship for multiples? If so, share it with us please  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1038
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I prefer single bets but sometimes I also use accumulation bets, usually it also depends on the money you have if you have a lot of money to bet it's better to bet single bets but if it's only a little and want to get high odds you can use accumulation bets, to be honest I don't understand how The clear accumulation or parlay working system is that I only bet on single bets.

It's also best if I don't try a betting system that I don't know, but I've learned little by little over the past few days about what parlay betting is and also the accumulation bet that you mean, but for now I prefer to bet all my budget money on matches. single, nothing more than that, because even then I also look for possible opportunities to win because I use quite a lot of money, so I have to be more careful when betting.  Wink
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 875
Not Your Keys, Not Your Bitcoin
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I will go with accumulated bets, not because of greed but the chance of recovery of losses from the previous. Let's say for instance: Newcastle is having a match against Manchester City and then because of the form of City, you select a straight win X2 with odd of 1.3, if you bet that game with $100 and it win, you will win $130 in return and if the next time you place another bet on Manchester City with another $100 and they lost, you will have nothing and will be left with $30. Your initial $100 is gone and you are left it $30 and to make back the initial, you will probably need to gamble a lot to get back that money before even starting to think of profits.

Now, if you have $100 on 10 odds with 7 games and all won as you predicted, you will win $1k right and you can bet another $100 in your next game, even if you lose you can still have $900 left in your account and with more strategy, you can win more if luck shine on you. The only challenge I see here is that the more you accumulate games, the harder it becomes to win because there is every chance a single game from that accumulated games will make you lose the bets.
sr. member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 251
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Assuming, you are terming Parlay as Multiple betting.

Quote
A parlay in sports betting is when a bettor makes multiple wagers (at least two) and ties them into the same bet. If any bets in the parlay lose, then the entire parlay loses. However, if all wagers win, the bettor gets a bigger payout.

I don't prefer sports betting at all, but if I have to choose one then it will be a single bet for sure because parlay is high risk and more likely you will lose if one bet goes the other way than you expected, just bet one time and win or lose the feeling towards will end sooner but if you intend to keep on extending it longer then the consequences may end up as an addiction.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 556
Single bets and accumulated bets are the same because as long as they can place bets according to the money they can afford, they will be fine and still enjoy the gambling game. Placing a bet for both is equally profitable, especially if they place a bet with small money so that they don't lose a lot of money if they lose. Only greed will make them experience large losses in gambling because they will not see that they have to stop gambling before they experience even more losses immediately. If their target is to collect a lot of wins, they can use accumulated bets but must be able to place bets on teams that have the potential to win more to get more winning money.
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I prefer accumulated bets. They allow you to adjust the point spread or totals in your favor for multiple games.  But i know some people whi say single bets are like the low-key option because it’s easier to handle and less risky since each result stands on its own. Your call depends on how much risk you're up for, you can try either
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 456
I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

If you want a lower risk then a single bet is the right choice but if you want a big prize then a parlay is the right choice with a higher risk. I don't like parlays because they are difficult to win, if I bet on a parlay match then I will use a small bet. To be honest, I prefer single bets with fairly high stakes because it is logical to get a win rather than a parlay
Pages:
Jump to: