Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting - page 2.

danherbias07

legendary

Activity: 3108

Merit: 1115

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Accumulated bet for me too. I prefer playing longer games than just one single bet and test if I am super lucky. Based on experience, that doesn't happen to me a lot of times, winning in one sweep is always avoiding me. Although I do like single bets in sports gambling I also do parlays but not putting too much money in it. I once had a good win in a long parlay and I can say it was damn satisfying. But, it does take a lot of time analyzing games, stats, and history before I hit that. That's the good part with sports betting, you can increase your chance of winning by doing your own research and also by following the game that you love.
Casino games on the other hand is such a messy game. I've been playing Keno and Plinko and it's like a roller coaster ride, winning and then back to losing like you are being played by the gambling sites' system. One thing I've learned in casino games, is if you play longer (accumulated bet) there's a chance you will hit a multiple win or a chance to lose all your money if it won't happen as early as your balance can accommodate.

Wiwo

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 667

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: klidex on January 05, 2024, 10:42:35 PM

Quote from: Wiwo on December 30, 2023, 06:21:06 PM

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

Both bets formats have their ups and downs, but sometimes even though a single bet will give you a more lower odds, your chances of winning them are still very high compared to accumulative bets, and so for that many prefer to stick to single bets but staking higher amount.

Yes, this type of bet is different in that it provides also different benefits. Accumulation bets provide bigger profits than single bets, but the risk of losing is also large, so sometimes gamblers will think carefully if they want to bet on accumulation because gamblers always think about the risks, but in fact both are equally risky but sometimes accumulation bets make gamblers feel anxious about all the results of their choices. In many cases, gamblers experience more losses when accumulation bets are different from single bets, in single bets you choose several bets, not all of them lose, maybe only 1 or 2 lose, the rest you still get a profit if you choose more than 2 and single bets.

That's better because you avoid the risk of big losses, that's the good thing about accumulation bets. If we are ready to look at the bets we are playing, we can withdraw profits without waiting for the match to finish because sometimes if we wait until it's finished we will actually lose. Because usually if you wait until the end, if you accumulate bets, there will definitely be a blunder and in the end it can thwart our bet.

Multiple bets is higher in risk since the possibility of one or two of those games may go against your predictions, this is why we have to independently check the risks and choose which is best for us, and if you must look at multiple odds accumulations you must be very active and ready to use cashout for better ending if not you can easily lose your total bets.

But single bet also has their own risks and conditions, and even though the risk of losing the bet with a single bet is also high but less high than multiple bets you are put under pressure to stake a higher amount on a single bet compared to the amount you stake on multiple odds to accumulate a good reward ithe n payout.

Bitinity

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1310

As a small gambler who have small budget to gamble, parlay bet is the best choice for me because I have the possibility to win big with small bet amount only although the risk is higher and the winning chance is small. The feeling of winning parlay bet with big odds and small bet amount is better than winning big amount with single bet but the bet amount is big as well. Although I'm not playing sports betting much, but I do parlay bet most of the time when I see there are some good matches that I understand (at least a bit).

Tipstar

sr. member

Activity: 1750

Merit: 280

Smart World Global Token

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I use both but placing single bets are easier, quicker and the results are instant. I do them mostly on football and cricket games.
I do parlay on tennis where the odds are too low and combining a few would give better results. But the gambling result would depend on the result of each games.
Among them the first one is the goto for most of the sports gambler as most of the time emotions are attached to the game and bet. People bet for their team or player and they don't care about a small rise on the odds because the result of the game is more important than the bet itself.

klidex

hero member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 504

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Wiwo on December 30, 2023, 06:21:06 PM

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Both bets formats have their ups and downs, but sometimes even though a single bet will give you a more lower odds, your chances of winning them are still very high compared to accumulative bets, and so for that many prefer to stick to single bets but staking higher amount.

Sometimes when I want to use the cash-out feature, I prefer to use cumulative bets, and by so doing I will be on standby to cash out any available profits without waiting for the finals of the games, these ways I avoid the risk of total loses since my chances to lose with that cumulative bets is higher.

Yes, this type of bet is different in that it provides also different benefits. Accumulation bets provide bigger profits than single bets, but the risk of losing is also large, so sometimes gamblers will think carefully if they want to bet on accumulation because gamblers always think about the risks, but in fact both are equally risky but sometimes accumulation bets make gamblers feel anxious about all the results of their choices. In many cases, gamblers experience more losses when accumulation bets are different from single bets, in single bets you choose several bets, not all of them lose, maybe only 1 or 2 lose, the rest you still get a profit if you choose more than 2 and single bets.

That's better because you avoid the risk of big losses, that's the good thing about accumulation bets. If we are ready to look at the bets we are playing, we can withdraw profits without waiting for the match to finish because sometimes if we wait until it's finished we will actually lose. Because usually if you wait until the end, if you accumulate bets, there will definitely be a blunder and in the end it can thwart our bet.

Doan9269

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 560

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

If you're a regular gambler, then you will know about this two facts to why accumulated bets is more preferred to most gamblers, the first reason is the increased tendencies of earning more and having higher odds to your best, the second is to have a combination of games and to help blend the fun of being entertained while taking bets on more than two games while gambling, since gambling is all about being entertained, we couldn't wait to see anything resisting us from having multiple combinations while staking our bets in other to have more fun while gambling.

Huppercase

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 513

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I can speak from experience that single bets has its own risk and accumulated risk is a combination of single bets. A single bets has a two options which is to win or to lose and as soon as the game is played, you are done and you know what's up with your result but accumulated bets has twice the amount of single bets depending on the numbers you have stack together. If you accumulate two single bets, you have twice the risk of a single bets and if you have three single bets accumulated together, you have three times the risk of a single bets and so on.

The one I prefer is a single bets, with this type of bets you can select an option and expect the outcome the pretty fast and if you win, you are good to go into the next bets but with accumulated bets, if you stack them together; it means you expect all go win and a situation where you predict all and the rest win only for the last one too fail you will be really painful you know. Though, to enjoy single bets, you must have a lot of money at hand to enjoy it so that you don't get tempted with urge to accumulate odds.

agustina2

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1008

I prefer single bets for the reason that I don't want to add more deep thinking and analysis if I turn that slip into multiple bets at once.

I will just consider accumulated bets if, I want to try some risks and if I see some bets that are worthy of placing a bet.

Aside from that, if I do accumulate bets, I'm more of taking a set of underdog sides compared to doing a parlay of those within "safe odds" since we do accumulate bets in the first place to boost the total odds. I don't understand what's the sense of risking it on the set of safe odds that cannot even assure us that it's already a sure win.

YOSHIE

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1759

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet or accumulation in sports betting has different understanding, both are different features and also the benefits are varied, so are the risks varied.

My understanding is that if you believe in accumulation betting, of course you can add the value of your bet during the game, within a certain time, but the risk is still high, because you are adding the value of the bet to a certain team to get good results, As far as I know, if you are sure that your bet can win, maybe that is better for you, for me it is not a high risk, I have tried it when both teams drew, I made an accumulation bet on a team that I was 100% sure would win, the fact was that in the 90th minute+ the opposing team scored 1 more goal to make it 2-1, the accumulation disappeared.

Different from single bets, from the start we only focus on one choice, winning and losing is already a risk, but I like to do it and many bets are successful, for me I prefer single bets.

goinmerry

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1083

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Which one is profitable? There's no such thing as that. You just have to play those both right regardless of the bet option.

Both have pros and cons and of course, expect that you have to play with the odds here.

Stacking bets within for let's say odds ranging from 1.2 - 1.5 is still risky. Maybe just stick with the one you really preferred.

Pandu Geddon

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 583

Bons.io Telegram Casino

Quote from: odunybiz on January 05, 2024, 01:32:38 AM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on January 02, 2024, 03:07:13 PM

Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.

The high probabilities of winning with single bet doesn't assure you with profit. Odds of this single bet mostly determine. Bet place on singles with odd more than 2.00 may give profit if you won half of the game played (assuming winning 2 games out of 4 predicted). But in cases where single bet are placed on small odd, you may even be at lost if one of the game loses.

Your analysis is correct, and we need to pay attention to the correct odds when we bet on single bets. I usually bet on both, accumulation may provide more profits, but also remember that the risk is also increased.
I do both, but more often I bet single. I don't bet on many matches, only a few that I'm interested in. Sometimes some place single bets but place large amounts because they believe in their chances of winning.

ethereumhunter

hero member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 541

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Findingnemo on January 03, 2024, 04:39:27 PM

Single bet is the only kind of betting that I have ever done when it comes to sports betting so I guess I am not gonna risk all the winnings to win more and the Parlay is more like going all in after every winning streak in dice or crash game even though you realize that the chances of losing all the previously won rewards just over one loss.

As long as when placing a single bet, we don't use a lot of money to bet, it's still safe, and we won't experience a lot of losses if we lose. That is the amount we can accept if we lose so we will not exceed that limit. Risking all the money to get a bigger win is not worth doing because we will run out of money immediately and not be able to place any more bets. So placing single bets or accumulation bets is no problem as long as we can place bets with the money we can afford so that we won't experience losses we can't imagine.

odunybiz

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 119

Epsiloan Protocol

Quote from: SmartGold01 on January 02, 2024, 03:07:13 PM

Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.

The high probabilities of winning with single bet doesn't assure you with profit. Odds of this single bet mostly determine. Bet place on singles with odd more than 2.00 may give profit if you won half of the game played (assuming winning 2 games out of 4 predicted). But in cases where single bet are placed on small odd, you may even be at lost if one of the game loses.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2296

Merit: 755

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Single bet is the only kind of betting that I have ever done when it comes to sports betting so I guess I am not gonna risk all the winnings to win more and the Parlay is more like going all in after every winning streak in dice or crash game even though you realize that the chances of losing all the previously won rewards just over one loss.

dezoel

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1072

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

It depends on the level of risk you are willing to take and your confidence in the games that you are willing to bet on. Single bets are less risky than parlays because when you make a single bet, you get to have the reward at the end of the game and that's it, but when you are playing a parlay, you will have to wait for the results of all the matches or bets that you've made and a single lost bet will cost you the parlay and the money is gone for good.

So, I would say it depends on the knowledge and experience and the level of risk a bettor is willing to take. I would only do parlays if I knew that I was going to win or at least have way more chances of winning than losing. Otherwise, I would go with a single bet while having a higher bet amount on a match that I'm confident about.

SmartGold01

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 713

Don't joke with my Daughter

Quote from: Yatsan on January 02, 2024, 04:18:24 PM

Quote from: SmartGold01 on January 02, 2024, 03:07:13 PM

Snip

Nothing works consistently in gambling. Let's say you won 9/10 matches with single bets and your total earning is $200 from a capital of the same amount on each bet (just an example). Now given that profit won't be big with small odd single bet, the winnings could be erased with one single losing bet. High rolling amount and low rate of return and this is the opposite of accumulated bet wherein you could lose $200 on 9 bets but earning more with a in a parlay bet due to odd multiplier.

Yes you are correct we can't totally rely on any of this bet because they all work with probability and if the luck isn't there we can still find it difficult to achieve a winning even though is the smallest odd we can still lose them therefore there is no assurance in single or multiple bets.
Just that with multiple bet combination we can have a high odd with no specify winning chance and is 50/50 base game.

Natalim

hero member

Activity: 2898

Merit: 590

BTC to the MOON in 2019

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet over accumulated bet or parlay. We are gambling with chances here and single bets have bigger chances of winning compared to accumulator.

Accumulator may look attractive mate but you have a very slim chance specially if you'll increase the parlay legged.

Here's a real picture of parlay and its chances.
https://frontpagebets.com/betting/basics/parlays/article_b50cc0d6-14f2-11ee-beaa-67c28cd71cb6.html

Quote

Parlay Size Odds of Winning
# of Legs   Odds of Winning
Two Legs   27.47%
Three Legs   14.37%
Four Legs   7.52%
Five Legs   3.94%
Six Legs   2.06%
Seven Legs   1.08%
Eight Legs   0.56%
Nine Legs   0.30%
Ten Legs   0.15%

maydna

hero member

Activity: 2912

Merit: 556

Quote from: Antotena on January 02, 2024, 03:33:24 PM

Quote from: maydna on January 02, 2024, 11:26:20 AM

~snip~

Single bets and accumulated bets are not the same because one has lower risk and one has high risk, one has potential to give you huge return and one has potential to give you less return. It's more like the lower the risk, the lower the return for single bets while accumulated bets has higher risk with higher return. Single bet can only have high return when the risk is high. In some bookies, you can bets that a particular player will be the one to score the first goal and you will have a single bets with high odd but of course it will have high risk because such might not happen.

If you place bets on accumulated odds, you can make huge money and recover quickly from loss but they are hard to achieve but when you do, you will recover all you have been losing to the bookmakers. Playing a 100 odd games a day with over 2.5 in some matches might be hard but in a month, if you are serious and very good at predictions, you can make that in atleast twice in a month and after calculations, you might lose 28x and win 200x, subtract that from your profit and loss, you will have 72x profits. This is only possible if you know what you are doing.

It does have different risks and it depends on how big we are going to place the bet. We can do it as long as we can accept the risk, whether a single bet or an accumulation bet. If not, we can just place a single bet. Otherwise, we will experience more losses. However, some gamblers are more interested in placing accumulation bets because of the factor of getting bigger wins than if they placed a single bet. It also depends on a person's habits in placing bets because I know some friends are more comfortable placing single bets, and they never want to place accumulation bets.

If we have the skills, we can place any bet and hope to win. But those who don't have good skills hope to get big wins by placing accumulation bets and that's normal. Apart from that, we also have to focus on the bets because of the large number of bets we place. Most people don't know what they are doing but still do it because they are tempted by the big wins they can win. But that won't always happen, especially since this is gambling. So we should only place bets with money we can afford.

Coin_trader

copper member

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1163

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: odunybiz on December 30, 2023, 06:06:49 PM

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet for me as I’m not a pro on sports and I have limited time to analyze a match which I can place a bet. Parlay is really more profitable than single bet but it takes a lot of courage and analysis skills in able to become successful to this.

Placing a parlay bet while you have meh analysis skills ~~suicide~~crazy bets. Single bet is still the best for mediocre gambler in sports betting. Mediocre gambler dominates the sports betting game so single bet will probably the winner on this discussion unless many ~~suicidal~~ crazy bettor here. Cheesy

PS: Change the word suicide to crazy just in case someone salty read my comment wrong.

Darker45

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1854

🙏🏼Padayon...🙏

I mostly place single bets. Parlays are good but risky. And because I don't do extensive research on my bets as I'm betting small amounts and only for fun, the risk is higher. Also, I'm only betting on one or two odds every now and then.

I mostly do parlays during NBA playoffs. As far as my experience is concerned, the disappointment is high especially if the only game that causes the entire parlay bet to crumble is a big upset. I once had a five-leg parlay that didn't win only because a team that has the highest probability of winning was defeated.

Topic: Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting - page 2. (Read 531 times)