Out of curiosity, what is dox?
I vote for some patience, although I too would love an update.
I vote for some patience, although I too would love an update.
Dox: documentation, real name, phone number, address.
He's online /now/.
Topic: SkepsiDyne Integrated Node - The Bitcoin Mining Company - page 44. (Read 104288 times)
Dox: documentation, real name, phone number, address.
He's online /now/.
Out of curiosity, what is dox?
I vote for some patience, although I too would love an update.
I vote for some patience, although I too would love an update.
Okay, Tawsix. You have 1 day to respond to this post, or dox will be dropped.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt... others won't. The later you respond, the harder it will be to make this go away.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt... others won't. The later you respond, the harder it will be to make this go away.
proof of purchase? img or pdf
don't frickin' demotivate the guy I invest in...
All shares and issues deserve as much sunlight, transparency, due-diligence, and background info as is reasonably possible.
Which is why I haven’t bought any shares. No reputation and full anonymity at the same time is a joke. Hopefully this guy is honest and will appear again, but I think we should be way more cautious and demanding.
It’s our money.
don't frickin' demotivate the guy I invest in...
All shares and issues deserve as much sunlight, transparency, due-diligence, and background info as is reasonably possible.
hi ^^
don't frickin' demotivate the guy I invest in...
and please sell some stock at 1x10^-8 as one did about yesterday... I wasn't fast enugh to catch that... damn you, "cancel" feature :p
But as you all don't believe in this just do it, you can at least save slightly abouve zero bitcoins ^^
don't frickin' demotivate the guy I invest in...
and please sell some stock at 1x10^-8 as one did about yesterday... I wasn't fast enugh to catch that... damn you, "cancel" feature :p
But as you all don't believe in this just do it, you can at least save slightly abouve zero bitcoins ^^
Hm, I wrote "50 bitcents each"... 
Anyways:
In total this offer would be for buying up to 6 shares. Each of these shares needs to be sold at max. 50 bitcents, so it would cost the one offering this max. 3 BTC.
Anyways:
In total this offer would be for buying up to 6 shares. Each of these shares needs to be sold at max. 50 bitcents, so it would cost the one offering this max. 3 BTC.
Market depth SIN:
bids --:-- [[6, 50000000], [10, 1]]
asks --:-- [[12, 84500000], [144, 84500000], [5, 99999998], [1, 99999999], [6, 99999999], [3533, 100000000], [2, 100000000], [1, 490000000], [3, 2000000000]]
^^^^
And should you want to buy, there are quite a lot of shares for less than 1 BTC available too!
Bids is what people wanting to buy shares are offering to pay for 1 share (in Satoshis, so 100000000 = 1 BTC), asks is what shareholders want to have for their shares.
The bid [6, 50000000] would mean for example that someone would pay 50 bitcents each for up to 6 shares.
bids --:-- [[6, 50000000], [10, 1]]
asks --:-- [[12, 84500000], [144, 84500000], [5, 99999998], [1, 99999999], [6, 99999999], [3533, 100000000], [2, 100000000], [1, 490000000], [3, 2000000000]]
^^^^
And should you want to buy, there are quite a lot of shares for less than 1 BTC available too!
Bids is what people wanting to buy shares are offering to pay for 1 share (in Satoshis, so 100000000 = 1 BTC), asks is what shareholders want to have for their shares.
The bid [6, 50000000] would mean for example that someone would pay 50 bitcents each for up to 6 shares.
wrong, thats 50 bitcents per share, and the order is for 6
Market depth SIN:
bids --:-- [[6, 50000000], [10, 1]]
asks --:-- [[12, 84500000], [144, 84500000], [5, 99999998], [1, 99999999], [6, 99999999], [3533, 100000000], [2, 100000000], [1, 490000000], [3, 2000000000]]
^^^^
And should you want to buy, there are quite a lot of shares for less than 1 BTC available too!
Bids is what people wanting to buy shares are offering to pay for 1 share (in Satoshis, so 100000000 = 1 BTC), asks is what shareholders want to have for their shares.
The bid [6, 50000000] would mean for example that someone would pay 50 bitcents each for up to 6 shares.
bids --:-- [[6, 50000000], [10, 1]]
asks --:-- [[12, 84500000], [144, 84500000], [5, 99999998], [1, 99999999], [6, 99999999], [3533, 100000000], [2, 100000000], [1, 490000000], [3, 2000000000]]
^^^^
And should you want to buy, there are quite a lot of shares for less than 1 BTC available too!
Bids is what people wanting to buy shares are offering to pay for 1 share (in Satoshis, so 100000000 = 1 BTC), asks is what shareholders want to have for their shares.
The bid [6, 50000000] would mean for example that someone would pay 50 bitcents each for up to 6 shares.
Might happen, or he might deliver.
Either way it would be nice to tone down the calls of scam until after the fact. Yes you've had your say and anyone reading this thread has been warned. It's now their choice what to do. Endlessly wailing "scammer" from the sidelines doesn't help and makes you look less than civilised.
So buyers, beware. The dangers of buying this stock have been pointed out. Buy at your own risk.
Either way it would be nice to tone down the calls of scam until after the fact. Yes you've had your say and anyone reading this thread has been warned. It's now their choice what to do. Endlessly wailing "scammer" from the sidelines doesn't help and makes you look less than civilised.
So buyers, beware. The dangers of buying this stock have been pointed out. Buy at your own risk.
If I am wrong, well Tawsix, you are not helping.
Yup, its why i have been pointing out that its 95% chance its a scam and 5% its a really bad investment. Such stuff is bad for the community.
I think if Tawsix ever posts anything again it will be along the lines of "i am tired of people accusing me of scamming, hence i am annoyed so fux you, i am out of this and blame the ppl who were asking questions" type of excuse.
Exactly my thoughts. Now people...go figure, im not some sort of "random" with weird opinions, here's the insight from someone that has a "track record" -> mrb
Don't be stupid, don't allow some shady or incompetent figure make a bad name for Bitcoin, this whole deal smells so badly that it makes me want to puke.
Don't be stupid, don't allow some shady or incompetent figure make a bad name for Bitcoin, this whole deal smells so badly that it makes me want to puke.
Watch out people! Tawsix has promised he would be "highly transparent [...] to the public and potential investors", in his promotional video, yet he has failed to meet that promise. He avoids all questions about the rigs he is purchasing, requests to mine in a pool for investors to monitor the mined coins, he is a new user with no track record, employs extravaguant eloquence that only a sleazy salesman would use ("You have provided the solid ground for others to build upon, the ability to reach untold heights that could not be reached alone" 
), etc. Smells like a scam to me...
If I am wrong, well Tawsix, you are not helping.
), etc. Smells like a scam to me...If I am wrong, well Tawsix, you are not helping.
As this is all uncharted waters I have to disagree with you.
I don't think anyone will lose their shirt on this project.
As with everything to do with bit coin I think of it as an experiment.
For the price of a coffee people are able to pool their money and take a chance that something exciting will happen.
If its a failure or a scam I am out a lunch. If it works out then I get a free lunch.
I don't think anyone will lose their shirt on this project.
As with everything to do with bit coin I think of it as an experiment.
For the price of a coffee people are able to pool their money and take a chance that something exciting will happen.
If its a failure or a scam I am out a lunch. If it works out then I get a free lunch.
Okay, if those who really invested in this joke [for whatever brain damaged reason] and are reading the posts here...say good-bye to your funds...how can anyone be so naive is just beyond me or anyone with a bit of sanity xD
It puzzles me that there are plenty of very specific questions on operational efficiency have been raised by others and me and from all the replies you post, these are always excempt and never recieve any reply. Why is that?
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
Agree 100%.
I don't have time to respond to naysayers. If he asked his questions in a professional manner instead of accusing me of theft and incompetence in every post, I would have been more than happy to respond.
But it's not just one user. Sukrim has asked several legitimate technical questions that weren't antagonistic.
Unless you have a question regarding the company or it's operation, I just don't have time to go back and forth arguing about non-company things.
Thanks for setting all this up, Tawsix. Now that 5 rigs have been ordered, to you have an estimate for what day those will be delivered to you, and what day actual mining might start?
We'll have all of the components for the rigs by June 1, which is the worst case scenario. One of our orders took longer to process than they had estimated, so the date shipped went from Friday to "sometime next week", so I'm in contact with them about changing the shipping rate so it gets here before next weekend. I will be assembling the rigs as the parts arrive, so as soon as the last components come, the rigs will be finished and put into operation.
Thanks for setting all this up, Tawsix. Now that 5 rigs have been ordered, to you have an estimate for what day those will be delivered to you, and what day actual mining might start?
It puzzles me that there are plenty of very specific questions on operational efficiency have been raised by others and me and from all the replies you post, these are always excempt and never recieve any reply. Why is that?
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
Agree 100%.
I don't have time to respond to naysayers. If he asked his questions in a professional manner instead of accusing me of theft and incompetence in every post, I would have been more than happy to respond.
But it's not just one user. Sukrim has asked several legitimate technical questions that weren't antagonistic.
It puzzles me that there are plenty of very specific questions on operational efficiency have been raised by others and me and from all the replies you post, these are always excempt and never recieve any reply. Why is that?
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
It was asked, repeatedly, why mining with initial rigs has not started, it costs shareholder money.
It was asked how exactly the rigs are set up, the mhas/s numbers and cost you state are far from ideal, so it could be either an "unoptimized newbie build" or a "cash-sink".
It was just today again asked how exactly the mining operation will commence. This was again not answered. A Zero-% Pool would give, via API access to shareholder, a third party datasource regarding generated BTC, a feature highly desireable to shareholders at ZERO cost via say btcmine.com.
Why are these concerns not taken seriously, especially since points raised and suggestions made would significantly improve the business you are so fond of.
Agree 100%.
I don't have time to respond to naysayers. If he asked his questions in a professional manner instead of accusing me of theft and incompetence in every post, I would have been more than happy to respond.
Now we're on the same page. : )
I await comments from the businessman himself here in this thread.
I await comments from the businessman himself here in this thread.
I misspoke, only invested BTC will be sold and spent as it comes in, generated BTC will be sold as required to grow and pay for operations.
Update: The components for 5 rigs have been purchased. As GLBSE is currently down, I am unable to further withdraw funds or reissue and reprice the current unsold shares as voted upon by the shareholders. I will be checking again later tonight, and I will most likely be making another purchase with the new funds. Once again, I sincerely thank all those who have invested so far, you're the reason the dream is alive!
Jump to: