Pages:
Author

Topic: [SKY] Skycoin Launch Announcement - page 61. (Read 381579 times)

hero member
Activity: 498
Merit: 500
April 21, 2017, 02:43:50 AM
Update:

New Wallet Version:

Skycoin Wallet version 15 is on the website, which fixes dozens of UI bugs.
- Transaction status should be working
- There is a combined installer for Windows 32/64 bit now
- The windows path issue was fixed
- Peer to peer connections and PEX (peer exchange) are enabled now

There is a huge back log of improvements on the wallet we are working through.

---

We have to decide what we will focus on for the next push
- Marketing / Infographics / Videos / Transslatoin
- 2.0 wallet, wallet usability improvements and QA
- Release of demo applications for the skycoin network
hero member
Activity: 498
Merit: 500
April 21, 2017, 02:42:35 AM
Update:











Skycoin is listed on two exchanges now.
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
April 21, 2017, 02:29:33 AM

Please everyone join the telegram so we have a point of entry for the entire community. It's simple and easy and you can use it on any device.

What's wrong with good ol' IRC?
This is what OP used 2 years ago...
Anyone can login, use VPN, no need for ID or phone verification, from any device.
It has DM, sharing, logs... Everything.
It might be old tech, but it works great.
It worked great for every coin that was geek oriented (in contrast to hype oriented).
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
April 21, 2017, 02:12:08 AM
Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?

THIS !
Even with Linux, VPN, iptables etc. I still feel like a sitting duck... Sad
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 500
April 20, 2017, 08:18:49 PM
Coinmarketcap is updated thank you Gliss!  Cool
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
April 20, 2017, 05:48:45 PM

I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.

I think slack is a good approach but there is security issues and also the memory leaks are ridiculous. Please everyone join the telegram so we have a point of entry for the entire community. It's simple and easy and you can use it on any device.

Telegram is much nicer imo, more professional and secure.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 500
April 20, 2017, 04:11:36 PM

I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.

I think slack is a good approach but there is security issues and also the memory leaks are ridiculous. Please everyone join the telegram so we have a point of entry for the entire community. It's simple and easy and you can use it on any device.
hero member
Activity: 767
Merit: 500
Never back down !!!
April 20, 2017, 04:03:58 PM

I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Open up a slack channel and the people will come.
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 250
April 20, 2017, 04:03:11 PM

I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin

Had a great chat with ICOcountdown on telegram regarding distribution. Looking forward to developments regarding this issue.

Carry on Skycoin! Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 500
April 20, 2017, 03:57:06 PM

I'd be surprised if Poloniex listed it with a question mark over the remaining 95% of the supply being in the dev's control regardless of the longevity and validity of the project.
Exactly, I've read everything that the dev has said in this thread recently but nothing he said really gives an excuse for this. Distribution should be a priority or the whole project just looks incompetent, the more people find out about the coin while the distribution is basically non existent, the more people will lose interest in the project simply because they have no access to the coins at a normal price, knowing that devs are holding 95% of the supply and the coin has already been in development for 3.5 years.

I love this coin, 3.5 Years of development, that is good but distribution cannot be the same, you are confusing the economy for no reason and there will always be a big question mark above this project. I have traded cryptos on this forum for about 4 years now and this is one of the worst distributions I've ever seen, putting a huge stain on its amazing tech, there is no excuse for this.

We are talking about distribution in the telegram chat, it would be great if all the community members could jump in. It's all to play for - the correct distribution has to occur though for the network to remain decentralized. So far there is no common solution to distribution problems.

There is no POW or POS in relation to this coin, so it has to be taken with a gentle approach. So I invite anyone to come in and talk about the distribution model because the community can really help with this.

https://t.me/Skycoin
legendary
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
April 20, 2017, 12:53:28 PM
Having issues running the wallet on windows, it just gets stuck "Loading..." any fix for this?

Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?

if you go win firewall you must add new inbound and outbund rules for skycoin
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
April 20, 2017, 12:00:35 PM
Having issues running the wallet on windows, it just gets stuck "Loading..." any fix for this?

Also is there a way to password protect our wallets?
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 500
April 20, 2017, 08:39:13 AM
Is it possible to clone? Surely people will just release the same product with more adoptable distribution?

There is still alot of development to do.
legendary
Activity: 1138
Merit: 1001
April 20, 2017, 08:24:31 AM
Is it possible to clone? Surely people will just release the same product with more adoptable distribution?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 281
dApps Development Automation Platform
April 20, 2017, 08:07:14 AM
I think developers are hoping to get more money
maybe.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
April 20, 2017, 07:56:51 AM
I think developers are hoping to get more money
sr. member
Activity: 284
Merit: 250
April 20, 2017, 02:34:23 AM
Hmm yeah the distribution and Dev share is a bit on the high side. I'm sure the devs are considering something though.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
April 19, 2017, 10:19:17 PM
I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

Agreed,
I would have purchased more if the distribution wasn't so rediculous,

Same. In fact I bought into the ICO thinking the total supply was the amount that was being sold in the ICO (I know, my mistake). But I am so far impressed by the devs responsiveness and receptiveness, they are definitely aware of our concerns. Let's wait and see what happens. Either way I am very optimistic about this project, I remember reading about it when I first joined BCT in early 2014 and I'm happy to see it is starting to come to fruition.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 500
April 19, 2017, 05:11:55 PM
Visualization of Skycoin development:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gHyxomee6E
sr. member
Activity: 527
Merit: 250
April 19, 2017, 03:07:28 PM
I think the only real solution is to burn a considerable amount, lets say 80 Million, after which only 15 million will be left over for distribution. The devs could keep a significant amount, lets say 5 mil, to fund future development.

Ideas?

I too think this is a pretty good idea
The dev seems open to ideas. Do a thorough analysis and then post. The team hasn't had much time to think about distribution. Come back with historical examples and maybe you can change devs mind. Talking like this doesn't help cuz all investors want less supply lol
Pages:
Jump to: